Rolling Stone Turns 1000! (That's 38 In Human Years)

Rolling Stone had a birthday last week — one freakin' thousand issues and still as fresh and relevant as it was on its first day on the planet, 9 November 1967. Yeah, she has a few wrinkles here and there, but she's remarkably well-preserved and can still hold her own with any magazine that came before or after her birth.

Sure, there were other music magazines before Rolling StoneCrawdaddy for the hippie-oriented and the original Hit Parader, with its chord charts and lyric sheets, come to mind — but by and large, those magazines were beholden to the record labels and their content reflected that. Whatever else there was about rock & roll was pretty much teen fanzine fodder.

Rolling Stone changed all that, and then some. From the outset, her edict was rock & roll not only can change the world, but is changing the world, and you'd be well-advised to listen. That was a powerful message, a defiant proclamation, and one to which, through all the years and changes, the magazine has steadfastly adhered. And somewhere along the way, she went from being an almost underground newspaper to evolve into the cornerstone of modern journalism it is today.

Nobody writing about pop culture today can deny they were influenced by Rolling Stone, in fact, most of us would probably would not have been inspired to write at all had it not been for Jann Wenner and his cadre of guerilla journalists. Guys like Hunter S. Thompson vindicated our belief that the way we were being taught journalism was just, well, boring. He and others, such as Cameron Crowe, demonstrated that not only was it okay to immerse oneself in reportage, to become a character in the story, it was essential. I've not used the phrase "in my opinion" since; it seems a redundancy.

From its inception, Rolling Stone recognized the power of the image: that publicity still of John Lennon in How I Won the War was the reason I, a scrawny 14-year-old kid with delusions of rock stardom, bought that first issue. Those cover images kept me — and millions others — coming back again and again. Whether it was Annie Liebowitz reinventing the art of portraiture in her photos or Robert Grossman's brilliant political caricatures, those covers have, almost all of them, been snapshots of the moment. More, they stand as testaments of history.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for ray-ellis

Article Author: Ray Ellis

Ray Ellis is a freelance writer who has been dissecting pop culture and its effect on how we view ourselves for over twenty years, ruffling feathers and dragging unsuspecting pedestrians along for the ride whenever possible.

Visit Ray Ellis's author pageRay Ellis's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    May 16, 2006 at 8:18 am

    very nice job Ray - great title - thanks!

  • 2 - Barry Stoller

    May 16, 2006 at 1:42 pm

    One other big difference between then and now: No access to Wenner Publications without an agent - no matter how much anyone kisses their big, bloated butt.

  • 3 - Michael J. West

    May 16, 2006 at 2:52 pm

    Ugh! Are you kidding? Rolling Stone has been an EMBARASSMENT for at least a decade! God in Heaven! And I'm neither neocon or neopunk!

  • 4 - Matthew T. Sussman

    May 16, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    A fitting anniversary - one for each remaining subscriber.

  • 5 - zingzing

    May 16, 2006 at 4:31 pm

    rolling stone? let it... die. (thumb down in pie.)

  • 6 - Rodney Welch

    May 16, 2006 at 4:41 pm

    Reading the 1000th issue is like reviewing my life during high school and college. I could remember when just about each issue arrived in the mail. Rolling Stone, Playboy, Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Warren Zevon and the Clash -- pretty much my diet back then.

  • 7 - Gordon Hauptfleisch

    May 16, 2006 at 6:00 pm

    I remember--when I had a subscription-- reading my copy cover to cover. Now I just occasionally look at a newstand copy and maybe glance at the front cover top to bottom--or if I'm not so engrossed, top to middle, before passing on it altogether.

  • 8 - NR Davis

    May 16, 2006 at 6:19 pm

    RS had its day and its sun has long since set. The mag's initial joie de vivre, communal spirit, sense of rebellion, authenticity and relevance are as dead as Hunter. Congrats on the 1000th issue and I'm glad you enjoyed it, Mr. Ellis, but do know that a lot of people are long past caring about Boz Scaggs-worshipping sellout Jann Wenner and his sellout magazine and resultant empire.

  • 9 - Natalie Bennett

    May 16, 2006 at 7:44 pm

    This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net, which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States. Nice work!

  • 10 - the clear deigns

    Jun 04, 2006 at 11:41 am

    Why is Warren Zevon missing from the cover? A better fit for one of the angels than Kurt or Hunter, I say!

  • 11 - Cy Hunter-Quick

    Jun 13, 2006 at 9:05 pm

    RSM has been the finest medium for am americophile to keep in touch with essential USA feel. I hope it does not morph into something samey, or arty, but stays as edgy as I find it -but it is none of my business: not only am I English but I am old (12 inside, 65 outside). Cy

  • 12 - duane

    Jun 14, 2006 at 12:49 am

    Month after month RS continues to compile some of the finest ads featuring really attractive pouty-lipped stuckup babes and ridiculously handsome androgynous males who are going nowhere in life except to parties with the attractive babes. I'm so envious. I didn't realize there were articles interspersed among the ads until, a while back, I heard from my niece that she was excited about the Olson Twins being on the cover, and she begins quoting bits of the article to me. "Article?" I says, scratching my head. Well, you learn something every day. Incidentally, the niece got a little miffed when she later discovered that I didn't know that the Olson Twins were a couple of chicks from some TV show, and not that band of girlish guys, who Melissa [that's the niece] explained was called Handsome or some such, and who, she explains to me, were recently featured in the fashion section of RS. "Wow!" says I, "Rolling Stone is just jam packed with the kind of information that we need to keep up with the latest developments in American culture, huh, Melissa?" Melissa just gave me this weird look and ran off to watch the Lizzy McWire (or some such) show. Well, I always did have trouble talking to kids.

  • 13 - Pop Culture Gangster

    Jul 05, 2006 at 1:25 pm

    At least you got your 1,000th issue. I'm locked in a mortal battle with Rolling Stone's customer service to get my copy. It must have been lost in the mail or stolen, and now they refuse to send me a replacement issue, saying that they are out of them.

    Odd thing is that they still have it for sale on their web site. For $20.00! You can go to my blog (follow the URL link to the left) for the full saga and hopefully a resolution!

  • 14 - Tcat

    Jul 21, 2006 at 4:21 pm

    Great issue and I have one! I hate to part with it but must pass on the memory to my brother, who turns the big 50 this year! Like RS he also is still kicking and 3 dimensional as well!

  • 15 - Ray Ellis

    Jul 21, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    Nice of you to pass on the issue to your brother--may he guard it with his life. And a happy birthday to him!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs