My Interview With Josh Bazell About His New Novel Wild Thing - Page 3

Part of: Scott Butki's Book Time: Interviews with Authors

Not only does Bazell have footnotes but there's even a "guest footnote" at one point, penned by Violet, one of the characters of the book — a novel idea.

Now let's get to the interview.   

How did you come up with this story? And just how WOULD you summarize what this is about because I am struggling to do so but I blame that on allergy meds.

It’s about a physician who takes a job investigating rumors of a carnivorous lake monster in Minnesota while on the run from the mafia because he used to be a hitman. That’s obviously a pretty classic noir setup, but I think my approach to it is new enough to keep things interesting.

What kind of research did you do for this? Did you ride on a cruise ship to get those parts right or chase after what may be mythical creatures?

Homey don’t cruise, but at the moment I’m in LA trying to find one person in the film industry who doesn’t lie all the time, so I think I can say I’ve got the mythical creatures thing covered. Plus, I always keep up with unexplainedmysteries.com, and not just because they link to my book. Although mostly for that reason.

I love your footnotes. Do you and Lisa Lutz have a contest going to see who can a) help return footnotes to novels and b) who can write funnier ones? But seriously, why do you think you have more footnotes than most authors or is it the other way round and other authors should use them more?

Lisa Lutz uses footnotes?

Speaking of footnotes — last question on this topic, I promise — are all the footnotes accurate and true, particularly the one about cruise ships on page 11?

They pretty much have to be, since unlike with regular text, you can’t just append a footnote to them saying “Not.”

How would you describe your protagonist, Pietro? How are you similar to the protagonist and how are you different?

We don’t have the same name.

I'm very impressed by the amount of sourcing you did for this novel. In fact I think it's fair to say your source section and appendix are
longer than I've seen in some non-fiction books. Why did you decide to go into so much detail – I am not complaining (I especially enjoyed the section on Sarah Palin) — just curious.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2 — Page 3 — Page 4Page 5

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for scott-butki

Article Author: Scott Butki

Scott Butki was a newspaper reporter for more than 10 years before making a career change into education... then into special education.

He reads at least 50 books a year and has about the same number of author interviews each year and, …

Visit Scott Butki's author pageScott Butki's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - BobP

    Mar 10, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    Sorry to say that Mr. Bazell's answers pretty well reflected his distain for his readership: Loved Reaper, blah Thing. Reviews are running about 10 to 1 for Mr. Bazell to go back to writing what he REALLY knows. Please let him know that passing off Internet blogs as fact don't make his books interesting. Sorry. Hope he does better next time.

  • 2 - scott butki

    Mar 10, 2012 at 3:07 pm

    thanks for the feedback, BobP.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs