Kingsbury: Psychohistorical Crisis—Revolt Against Asimov's Second Empire

Author: DrPatPublished: Feb 02, 2005 at 4:32 pm 5 comments

One of the pillars upon which the giant reputation of Isaac Asimov still rests is the sweeping Foundation Trilogy, which details how mathematician and historian Hari Seldon, foreseeing a 30-millennium-long Galaxy-wide collapse of civilization, devised a plan to shorten the coming dark ages to a single millennium.

Seldon planned an openly-acknowledged path of historical development for a newly-created Encyclopedia Foundation located on a world at the fringe of the Empire whose collapse Seldon predicted. Periodically, this Foundation would face a Seldon Event, a psychohistorical crisis, in which a threat to its existence which would constrain the nascent second empire to follow a single, pre-determined, path. To keep the Seldon Plan on track, a second, hidden foundation consisting of heirs to Seldon's science of psychohistory would act as "wizards behind the screen" to ensure the coming of the Second Empire.

In Psychohistorical Crisis, Donald Kingsbury looks at the re-established Second Empire, over 2700 years after the crafting of the Seldon Plan. In this far-distant future, Seldon's name is lost in the mists of history, and psychohistory is a occult practice, whose "Psycholars" maintain their Galactic rule by keeping the tenets of their science secret. Citizens of this empire exist in their complex society only with the aid of a mind-enhancing outgrowth of Asimov's mind-probe, the quantum-mechanical familiar, or "fam". On the surface, all is pleasant and peaceful.

Beneath that calm, however, are roiling currents of revolution. And bobbing along, pulled this way and that by these currents, is Eron Osa, a mathematical genius with a modified fam. We meet Osa as he is stripped of his fam for an unspecified crime. Condemned to live without his memories (but warned by the rebel Psycholar Hahukum Konn not to use the "prosthetic" fam supplied by the ruling council), Osa is forced to live by his native wit—even to the extent of actually reading with his eyes (gasp!) a purloined book of the Founder's lessons as he attempts to recover the science he has lost.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for drpat

Article Author: DrPat

DrPat is the blog signature used by an old coot who hoards books, dances Argentine Tango, cooks a mean venison chili, and is happy to be along for the sag while my spouse does a marathon bicycle ride. …

Visit DrPat's author pageDrPat's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Aaman

    Feb 02, 2005 at 5:03 pm

    How does this fit with the Foundation prequels by Benford/Bear/Brin?

    Interesting book, necessary reading for psychohistorian-wannabes

  • 2 - DrPat

    Feb 02, 2005 at 7:42 pm

    The Second Foundation trilogy looks at the establishment of psychohistory in the Byzantine center of the first Empire, as Hari Seldon develops his plan, recruits and trains the disciples who will become the covert arm of the Seldon Plan, and jockeys for political clout to create and endow the Encyclopedia Foundation. This trilogy is focused on the inception of psychohistory.

    Kingsbury's novel, on the other hand, examines the "other end" of Seldon's Plan, in which the stagnant, declining first Empire has been replaced by the (now stagnant, declining) Second Empire.

    In voice, Benford and Brin have captured the simplicity of Asimov's writing, while Bear and Kingsbury explore further the concepts and vision the good doctor first addressed in the Foundation Trilogy.

    I found the Kingsbury vision of the far future much truer to Asimov's youthful vision of Galactic civilization than even some of Asimov's own later Foundation novels, in which the capability of men to control and progress their own destiny is replaced by a behind-the-scenes deus ex machina, R. Daneel Olivaw.

  • 3 - Eric Berlin

    Feb 03, 2005 at 11:29 pm

    Excellent review, DrPat. As a sometimes SF writer, I constantly yearn to be better versed in the "classics." I read the first Foundation book in high school and enjoyed it, but wasn't awe-struck as many other sci-fi fans were and are. Amazing that the Foundation universe still exists along with the likes of Middle Earth and certain other special worlds.

  • 4 - DrPat

    Feb 05, 2005 at 2:40 pm

    I suspect the Foundation universe (including the Second Trilogy and Kingsbury expansions) is just a bit too intellectual to support a wide fan base a la LOTR. Asimov wrote the Foundation Trilogy as a relatively youthful writer, at a time when he truly believed that men could, by science and technology, control their own destiny.

    His later works in the oeuvre reflect his growing skepticism in that regard.

  • 5 - Mike Kole

    Feb 05, 2005 at 11:08 pm

    Great review. This will be stuck in the pipeline for a while, as I am reading this series 'chronologically', and have only read Prelude to Foundation and Foundation thus far.

    I'm eager to see what Brin and Kingsbury have done to extend Asimov's work. I like Brin's other stuff (Kiln People especially), so his treatment is of great interest. Thanks!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 10, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs