Fox Throws in Towel (After Snapping Itself)

Fox News, trounced and ridiculed in court and in the blogosphere (see Ernest Svenson's analysis here), has dropped its lawsuit against Al Franken:

    The lawsuit had sought unspecified damages from Franken and Penguin Group, publisher of "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right."

    "It's time to return Al Franken to the obscurity that he's normally accustomed to," Fox News spokeswoman Irena Steffen said.

    On Friday, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin denied Fox's request for an injunction against the book cover. Fox dropped the suit Monday.

    Fox contended that some people might be tricked into thinking the book was a Fox product because the cover includes the words "Fair and Balanced" and a picture of Bill O'Reilly, the network's top anchor.

    But the judge said Fox's case was "wholly without merit," and the trademark "Fair and Balanced," registered by Fox in 1998, was weak. He also said the network was "trying to undermine the First Amendment." [AP]

Meanwhile, the attention has driven Franken's book to #1 in Amazon. Sometimes acting like a spoiled child - as Fox News has done here - gets you exactly what you deserve.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-olsen

Article Author: Eric Olsen

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and former publisher of Blogcritics.org, and former publisher of Technorati.com, which both rule. He is now editor, co-founder, and CEO of The Morton Report.

Visit Eric Olsen's author pageEric Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - TDavid

    Aug 26, 2003 at 4:01 pm

    Kind of reminiscent of BT who tried to claim a patent on hyperlinks. Why hasn't anybody tried to patent air yet? Er wait, that was in the movie Total Recall, wasn't it?

  • 2 - jadester

    Aug 27, 2003 at 2:46 pm

    d'you know that Sony was considering making "Shock And Awe" a trademark in the early stages of the Iraq War (when the US government seemed keen on using the phrase), the idea being they'd make a game related to the phrase. Happily, they dropped the idea not long after announcing they were considering it.
    If phrases can be trademarked and/or copyrighted (are they, in fact, equivalent?) does that mean soon dictionaries will have to pay royalties to lots of companies?
    It's like that thing with patents - some guy a little while ago demonstrated how stupid the current system is by obtaining patents for a number of basic inventions, including the wheel.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 13, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs