European Explorers: Not Quite As Bad As Previously Thought

A couple of weeks ago in celebration of Columbus Day, we discussed a series of books containing a quite unfavorable picture of the explorer, much of it written in his own words.

Columbus clearly was, shall we say, insensitive to the well-being of the natives he found in the New World; in fact he appears to have been insensitive to anyone else's needs other than his own.

But one charge commonly leveled against him and the other Europeans who followed him now appears to have been exaggerated: yes the Europeans brought new devastating diseases with them to the New World, but according to the NY Times, the natives were already in pretty bad shape:

    What had not been clearly recognized until now, though, is that the general health of Native Americans had apparently been deteriorating for centuries before 1492.

    That is the conclusion of a team of anthropologists, economists and paleopathologists who have completed a wide-ranging study of the health of people living in the Western Hemisphere in the last 7,000 years.

    The researchers, whose work is regarded as the most comprehensive yet, say their findings in no way diminish the dreadful impact Old World diseases had on the people of the New World. But it suggests that the New World was hardly a healthful Eden.

    More than 12,500 skeletons from 65 sites in North and South America — slightly more than half of them from pre-Columbians — were analyzed for evidence of infections, malnutrition and other health problems in various social and geographical settings.

    The researchers used standardized criteria to rate the incidence and degree of these health factors by time and geography. Some trends leapt out from the resulting index. The healthiest sites for Native Americans were typically the oldest sites, predating Columbus by more than 1,000 years. Then came a marked decline.

    Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-olsen

Article Author: Eric Olsen

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.

Visit Eric Olsen's author pageEric Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - NY Times

    Nov 07, 2002 at 12:04 am

    This article was lifted verbatim from the New York Times. Why no attribution?

  • 2 - Eric Olsen

    Nov 07, 2002 at 8:23 am

    Well, "NY Times," it was hardly "lifted" considering there is a link to the original story and the quoted part is offset - all quotes are offset and all quotes linked.

  • 3 - Brunelleschi

    Feb 04, 2009 at 8:27 am

    How about an equally sized section from Howard Zinn's "People's History of the United States?"

    :)

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 29, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs