Conceptual Fiction: The First Men in the Moon by H.G. Wells

Part of: Conceptual Fiction

Conceptual Fiction is a regular feature, contributed by Ted Gioia, focusing on major works of fantasy, science fiction, magical realism and alternate history. These books are celebrated in recognition that literary experimentation with ways of conceptualizing reality has been as important as experimentation with language in creating fiction of lasting value. Dismissing these books as genre or escapist works has created a blind-spot in literary studies that this feature aims, in some small part, to rectify.

For as long as stories have been told, their narrators have delighted in the possibility of traveling above the surface of the Earth. When we recall the tale of Icarus, who suffered by soaring too close to the sun, or hear the words of the psalmist—“Oh that I had wings like a dove! for then would I fly away”—we recapture in some degree the essence of this primitive longing. (Track down a copy of the out-of-print study Voyages to the Moon (1948) by Marjorie Hope Nicolson for an expansive history of this literature.)

By the time we get to the works of Jules Verne and H.G. Wells, these dreams are married to a modern pride in technology and an unabashed confidence in scientific advances. As such, these authors created stories of a different flavor, freed from the magical and mythical, and married to a quasi-realistic narrative style. Novels such as Verne’s From the Earth to the Moon (1865) and Wells’s The First Men in the Moon (1901) reveal, in a myriad of small ways, that they were written by men who not only dreamed about a lunar voyage, but who had some expectations about its inevitability.

Nonetheless, Wells—in stark contrast to Verne, who laboriously outlined the technological details of how his travelers were propelled to the Moon—simply concocts a phantasmagoric substance called cavorite—an anti-gravity metal that lets his explorers shoot off into the stratosphere without any need of fuel or engine or moving parts. One is inevitably reminded of “flubber” (a name created by compressing the longer term “flying rubber”), first introduced to moviegoers in the 1961 Walt Disney film The Absent-Minded Professor. In case you missed that film—ah, to be so lucky!—Fred MacMurray relied on flubber to fly around in a levitated Model T Ford.

Wells has his own absent-minded professor, Dr. Cavor, who is the inventor of this propulsion system that will send his (rocket-less) ship to the moon.  But the good doctor would hardly be able to put his ideas into play without the assistance of his more practical and business-minded neighbor Mr. Bedord. Think of them as the Victorian equivalents of Wozniak and Jobs. Wells’s concept of science seems to revolve around workshop eccentrics of this sort—readers may recall that his “time machine” was also the invention of a single individual tinkering away at home. Here again Verne is more realistic in his comprehension that only a large-scale effort by a huge team, well financed and with a broad range of skills, could ever make a lunar expedition into a reality.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for ted-gioia

Article Author: Ted Gioia

Ted Gioia is a writer and musician. He is the author of Delta Blues, The History of Jazz and, most recently, The Birth (and Death) of the Cool. You can follow Ted Gioia on Twitter at www.twitter.com/tedgioia.

Visit Ted Gioia's author pageTed Gioia's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Ruvy

    May 21, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    I happen to have a 1934 collection of Wells' stories - with an introduction by the author himself.

    In the introduction he explains very clearly that what wrote was not science at all, but a human story toyed with in one particular way to change things just a tad. He called it science fantasy that was designed to get you as involved in it as you would in good gripping dream. He credits Vernes as writing real science fiction, because the emphasis is on science in all of his novels. He is generous enough not to criticize Vernes on his character development in his own novels. Wells said that this collection did not include the "Autocracy of Mr. Parham", (or sumthin' like that) which he described as a comedy that never struggled through to a soft-cover edition. Writing in 1934, he asked "why should people read my invented fantasies when they can see the real actions of Mr. Hitler instead?"

    Sometimes having a real old book with comments by the author is damned helpful.

  • 2 - roger nowosielski

    May 21, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    Ted,

    Looked at your "100 Books" list; since you mentioned Invisible Man near the top, I invite you to look at Mr. Horace Mungin's short piece "Phantom Culprit," in the Politics section, May 12, 2009.

    I'm certain you'll enjoy it.

    Roger

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 13, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs