Conceptual Fiction: A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr. - Page 2

Part of: Conceptual Fiction

Taddeo is one of those who “fumble awhile with error to separate it from truth,” yet too often “seize the error hungrily because it has a pleasanter taste.” This type of epistemological musing is all too typical of Miller’s book, which takes ideas very seriously. In fact, A Canticle for Leibowitz takes them seriously in a way that few contemporary novels do. The long drawn-out discussions of concepts that once served as the centerpieces of big books (The Brothers Karamazov, The Magic Mountain, or perhaps most pronouncedly The Man Without Qualities) went out of fashion around the time Moses Herzog started writing crazy letters to dead people. Instead of encountering something like the Grand Inquisitor, we are more often treated to bad sex scenes nowadays. But as Dostoevsky reminds us, we all get what we deserve: angels enjoy a glimpse of God’s throne, while insects are given sensual lust. Miller, for his part, clearly aspires to the latter, and is proud to be part of this once vibrant tradition of novelists who incorporate serious Socratic dialogues into their fiction.

The concluding section of this tripartite novel is dominated by a debate between an abbot and a doctor on the morality of mercy killing. When is it valid to terminate a life in order to limit the risk of future suffering? Is pain the greatest evil (as the doctor insists), or is the desperation with which the sufferer responds to pain (as the abbot counters) the real tragedy here? You might be tempted to dismiss this part of A Canticle for Leibowitz as a dry, theoretical matter—until you learn that author Miller was a Roman Catholic who later committed suicide. His life, and its termination, embraced both sides of the debate . . . and as much more than an intellectual query.

Miller’s novel focuses on the members of a monastery who are pledged to preserving knowledge and culture in the aftermath of a nuclear holocaust. They are inspired by a murky tradition of a scientist named Leibowitz (later Saint Leibowitz). Leibowitz himself—or at least his alter ego—seems to linger on in the flesh, a post-nuclear realization of the myth of the Wandering Jew. (Miller lived for a while in the 1950s with sci-fi writer Judith Merril, and her Judaism interacts with his Catholicism in the pages of this novel.) The monks emulate Leibowitz and his quest to save some remnant of learning during the new Dark Ages, when all books and ideas are suspect. Miller's novel is divided into three separate stories, self-contained novellas set in the same locale but at different time periods, but each revolving around the same over-arching themes.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for ted-gioia

Article Author: Ted Gioia

Ted Gioia is a writer and musician. He is the author of Delta Blues, The History of Jazz and, most recently, The Birth (and Death) of the Cool.

Visit Ted Gioia's author pageTed Gioia's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • A Canticle for Leibowitz A Canticle for Leibowitz

    Winner of the 1961 Hugo Award for Best Novel and widely considered one of the most accomplished, powerful, and enduring classics of modern speculative fiction, Walter M. Miller, Jr.'s A Canticle for ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Jordan Richardson

    Jan 04, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    Such a great book! Glad to see it getting some attention here.

  • 2 - Ruvy

    Jan 05, 2009 at 6:01 am

    I did read beyond the opening sentence - many years ago. Upon rereading the book several times (Miller was a great writer), it seemed a fundamentally Catholic book, dealing with fundamentally Catholic themes - cloaked in how Catholicism goes wrong and is unable to save the world from a second nuclear holocaust, let alone a first one.

  • 3 - Dori

    Jan 05, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    Thank you for reminding me of this book that I loved in the 80's. I will try to purchase it for my nephew.

  • 4 - bliffle

    Jan 05, 2009 at 8:41 pm

    Man, it must be a hundred years ago that I read this book. Back when i was reading SciFi. But I remember enjoying it, peculiar as it was. I got a kick out of archeologists misinterpreting common store signs as mystical religious texts.

  • 5 - Cannonball Jones

    Feb 16, 2009 at 10:55 am

    I just finished the book and was browsing the net looking for other peoples' appraisals when I came across your review. Nice job!

    It's not often I enjoy a book so much when I so vehemently disagree with the views of the central characters (assuming they're being portrayed sympathetically). Normally the dialogues concerning euthanasia would have had me tearing my hair out and screaming in defence of the doctor but Miller handled it particularly well. Knowing that he eventually took his own life adds a whole new perspective to this.

  • 6 - Brian Dunbar

    Jul 31, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    I note with interest that it is now August of 2009 and we have yet to see Mr. Mason's promised comprehensive review.

    P'haps he bogged down in the second paragraph.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 22, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs