Christians Lose Their Compass: A Closer Look At Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials Trilogy - Page 3

Lyra sets to rescue her friend Roger, who has been kidnapped by a mysterious group known as The Gobblers. The Gobblers turn out to be part of The Magisterium, an all powerful religious oligarchy which controls Lyra's world. The Gobblers are part of a secret group whose investigations into a mysterious substance called Dust involve cruel experimentation on children to cut their daemons away. Lyra's adventure involves gypsies and witches and armored bears and a mysterious instrument which tells the truth to those who know how to read it.  It also becomes clear that Lyra is being used as a pawn between two powerful people, her Uncle Asriel and the wicked and beautiful Mrs. Coulter.

In Book 2, The Subtle Knife, Lyra escapes into another world through a tear that was created at the end of Book 1. In this world, she meets a young man named Will and together they discover that the universe is full of many different worlds, and tears in the fabric of those worlds are causing a great threat to the universe. Meanwhile, The Magisterium hunts Lyra and her Uncle Asriel foments a war which, he hopes, will destroy the power of The Magisterium. In the last book, The Amber Spyglass, the battle is joined by many more, including angels. Lyra's hunt for her friend Roger takes her, Odysseus like, to the underworld and back, each step along the way giving her another tool to battle against forces attempting to manipulate both her fate and that of the universe.

The story told in the His Dark Material's Trilogy is complicated, and not just in regards to theology. Much of the story revolves around the discovery and study of the substance "Dust," an elementary particle which seems to be attracted to beings with souls. There is liberal exploration of the "many worlds" school of quantum mechanics, which argues that "whenever numerous viable possibilities exist, the world splits into many worlds, one world for each different possibility (in this context, the term "worlds" refers to what most people call "universes")." Obviously that sounds like something straight out of science fiction, but it is in fact a mathmatically sound, serious branch of study in quantum mechanics. In fact, Pullman weaves these challenging scientific concepts into his work so seamlessly, as a parent I might be more concerned that I'd be confronted with complicated questions about elementary particle physics than about the existence of God.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2 — Page 3 — Page 4Page 5Page 6

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for kati-irons

Article Author: Kati Irons

I am a film and music librarian for a public library system. Like many of my kind, I suffer from RKS, or Random Knowledge Syndrome. These musings are the inevitable end result of that condition.

Visit Kati Irons's author pageKati Irons's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Gordon Hauptfleisch

    Dec 22, 2007 at 12:36 pm

    Well said, incisive. Dangerous stuff, that re-reading thing, but it seems to pay off.

  • 2 - T.C.

    Dec 22, 2007 at 7:49 pm

    Lovely analysis on the books. I've heard many different views on this, for lack of better terms, "uproar", but yours have been one of the most well-stated and open-minded.

    And I can't say I wouldn't be one of the ones asking more about the armored polar bears than the religious underlay of the books, too. :)

  • 3 - Richard W. Fitch

    Dec 23, 2007 at 12:58 am

    It's strikes me that Pullman may be "an atheist" less in the vein of Hawkins and Cutchens; and more in the camp of J.A.T.Robinson and Bishop Spong. It is remarkable how many pietistic "Christians" attempt to defend a straw 'god' that doesn't exist. Wherever and whatever God 'is', must be watching this human comedy and perpetually be rolling on the floor with divine laughter ---- the SWG can stay on strike - this provides ample entertainment.

  • 4 - Damien

    Dec 23, 2007 at 1:41 am

    If you've already read them, it's not radical to reread them. The radical thing would be for Christian naysayers to read them. I read them and they are anti God. If you don't see that, you aren't a very good reader.

    This is old news. The churchy folk hate the atheists and vice versa. It's never gonna change. New topic for Blogcritics please. I am getting so bored and tired of people making the same points about this issue.

    btw, I'm a churchy folk and I liked the book and the movie. Now that's radical.

    Pardon my sentimentality ... I enjoyed your article. Don't you think Pullman should get a rest now? His points really aren't on the caliber of Lennon or anything like that.

  • 5 - Diana Hartman

    Dec 23, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    as the (fallen catholic) parent of three children who thoroughly enjoyed pullman's adventures, i sincerely appreciate this article...

    to be sure, denouncing those who denounce what they haven't read is an old theme, but it's still a worthy theme because the only thing more repugnant than the opinions of those who haven't read a given book is the silence of those who have...

  • 6 - Heather Ames

    Dec 24, 2007 at 1:47 am

    Excellent article, Kati.

  • 7 - Natalie Bennett

    Dec 25, 2007 at 4:13 am

    This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net , which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States, and to Boston.com. Nice work!

  • 8 - Nancy

    Dec 28, 2007 at 1:27 pm

    Um... the Church did not kill Galileo, so I'm pretty sure that it does, in fact, deny that one. It's hard to give much credence to the rest of your Random Knowledge when you don't even get something that well known correct.

    Part of the reason there was a recent to-do about the Pullman books was that not that many people - especially adults - were even aware that they existed prior to the movie hype. Unlike the Narnia series, or the Harry Potter books, the Dark Materials series generated relatively modest interest. They just aren't in the same league, and perhaps for the very reason you indicate - they are pretty dark.

    Moreover, there is nothing wrong with a Church, which is there for the very purpose of guiding its members' moral lives, actively urging its members to see or not see a movie, to read or not read a book. The Church never suggested that Pullman should be punished for writing the books, just that its members should avoid them. (And that parents and teachers be aware of what they were about, and what Pullman's stated agenda was. C.S. Lewis is inevitably called a "Christian author," whereas Pullman is merely referred to as a "British writer." Why not "Atheist author?")

    Oh, and by the way, I did read the books.

  • 9 - Kati

    Dec 28, 2007 at 3:06 pm

    You are right and I spoke incorrectly. The Catholic Church did not execute Galileo. They did, however, try him for heresy, force him to recant his wackadoo belief that the earth revolves around the sun and, even after he did recant his wackadoo notion, placed him under house arrest for the rest of his life. They banned his works and, when he finally did die, presumably of natural causes, the Church refused to allow him to be buried with the rest of his family in his family crypt.

    So, you are absolutely correct. They didn't execute him, and a proud day in Vatican history was that I'm sure.

  • 10 - David Melnick

    Jan 06, 2008 at 12:15 am

    C.S. Lewis was directly related to Nazism. In other words, covered up with Christianity. Chronicles of Narnia does that also & that is also by C.S. Lewis. Coincidence? ;) -lol. Do the math.

  • 11 - Dr Dreadful

    Jan 06, 2008 at 12:51 am

    David, I think I speak for everybody when I say that I can honestly think of no math that would make the slightest sense of your comment.

  • 12 - brimcmike

    Jan 15, 2008 at 12:25 pm

    To speak of the His Dark Materials trilogy as atheistic is to miss the point. The story is based largely upon Gnosticism and William Blake's personal mythopoeia, which is heavily influenced by Gnosticism. For instance, The Authority is clearly patterned after the Demiruge; Metatron clearly patterned after one of the chief Archons, etc.

    Please see: Gnosticism and William Blake's mythology.

    I think it would be helpful, after familiarizing yourself with these and other related sources, to read the trilogy for the first time, or if you've already do so, to at least reconsider, or even to re-read the trilogy.

  • 13 - cbraslow

    Mar 04, 2008 at 10:52 am

    I loved these books in many ways and I'm an atheist, but there is no denying that these works are fundamentally anti-religious and specifically anti-Judeo-Christian. The Old Testament God himself does in fact die explicitly, after having been accused of lying, treachery and most of mankind's ills. I am truly astounded that religious leaders haven't made more of an issue than they have. I hope it's because they are disarmed by the books' other virtues (particularly Pan and the mulefa).

  • 14 - Austin Repath

    Oct 27, 2008 at 8:39 pm

    For two weeks my tv set and my telephone broke down. Alone in the house, I started reading His Dark Materials and had an amazing response to the book that has since that time transformed my life
    Would like to send you the url of my response to the trilogy, but realize that urls can't be posted
    Any suggestions
    Austin Repath

  • 15 - Christopher Rose

    Oct 27, 2008 at 9:08 pm

    Austin, you can post urls here but please format the links properly.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 10, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs