Fundamentally, are we, as a country, to consider ourselves a single community that puts a high value on education? I can't legally withhold my income taxes just because I don't approve of the wars the government is spending them on, or not pay sales tax at the corner store because my state has a corrupt legislature. If we consider education to be a different sort of public good, to be treated specially, and we allow individual families to withhold taxes because of religious beliefs, then what is the justification for public schools anyway? Simply to educate the poor? It's hard to imagine even basic educational standards being met by the broken stub of a public school system that would remain under that philosophy.
While he reserves his most urgent rhetoric for the school issue, Miller has a whole raft of reasons Christians shouldn't vote for Democrats, most notably the "values" issues that came to the fore in the 2004 Presidential election. His arguments are carefully organized and obviously deeply felt. But his terminology, and its underlying assumptions, require scrutiny.
Right off the bat, he conflates the terms secular and atheist. A great many Americans believe in the secular state without being atheists, but this book confuses the two terms. That's more than semantics — it betrays a misunderstanding of what secular means, and of what it means to this country.
As commonly used today, secular has two related meanings, neither of which implies atheism. First, it refers to worldly as opposed to spiritual matters. Second, it means "not specifically relating to religion or to a religious body," as in secular music. The word simply denotes that part of a life, society, or culture that is not spiritual or religious.
Miller believes Christians are inadequately represented in our secular government because they are not united in their voting habits. Discussing the 2004 exit polling that uncovered the famous "values vote," he calls it "one hint of a division occurring between secular, or atheistic, Democrats and Christian America." Through the book he "hopes to communicate to the Democratic Party why Christians don't vote for Democrats. How do Christians communicate to atheists their legitimate objections to the Democratic Party in a mature and loving way?"
Miller's stress on communication and kindheartedness is laudable. But the statements quoted above use more terms in questionable ways: Christian America and Christians. In his use of these words, Miller fails to take into account the many who consider themselves Christian but disagree with his take on what Christian really means. The monolithic Christian voting bloc he imagines cannot exist, at least as the American public is currently constituted. For a great many people of faith, religious values are only one aspect of their lives. They have many — and indeed, sometimes conflicting — factors on which to base their voting decisions.








Article comments
1 - Bliffle
50 years ago southern christians voted for democrats enthusiastically: they were segregationists.
2 - gonzo marx
most excellent Article and analysis...
thanks for the good Read and articulate Thoughts
would that more from all "tribes" of American culture read and heed some of th epoints made here
/golfclap
Excelsior?
3 - Jon Sobel
thank you Gonzo!
4 - Natalie Bennett
This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net, which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States. Nice work!