Book Review: Ubuntu Linux For Non-Geeks by Rickford Grant - Page 2

So anyway, a lot of people are finding out about Linux because they are either (a) fed up with Windows and looking for an alternative, (b) broke and can't afford either Windows or Macs, or (c) tech geeks who know several other reasons why they'd like to be using something else. In fact, I'm one of them (file me under “c” for “geek”). I recently switched over to Linux, and specifically to Ubuntu, and am typing this on my newly configured laptop as we speak. I'm not actually new to the world of Linux, but even I found some good information and nice tricks while going through Ubuntu Linux For Non-Geeks.

The book is safe for complete newbies to the world of Linux, and even to the world of computers. It walks you through literally everything from installation of the software, all the way to guided explanations on each major area of programs you might want to run. It does help if you have some prior computing experience, but if not then don't let that scare you away. It's a lot like Kix cereal: kid-tested, mother-approved.

Chapters are arranged by task, which is nice for clustering information into more relevant chunks. For example, installing the operating system and application software is all one chapter. Setting up your printer is another. Using your iPod is still another. This helps those who may not need every section, as some may not be wholly relevant to your needs, or are just something you've already figured out). For the most part, you could skip around chapters in whatever order you like. When there are skills or programs that have been previously covered, Mr. Grant either repeats the information or re-mentions the section that explains the item in more detail.

Because of the book's focus on welcoming new Linux users, there will be a good deal of information that is beneath the level of someone who may just be new to Ubuntu but has used other Linux distros. If so, then you probably don't need a book like this to begin with, and would be better served with something geared towards the guts and inner workings of the underlying OS.

But even with that said, there were still quite a few things I learned that give the book appeal as a nice reference for even intermediate users. First off, the chapter on using the command line for basic operational tasks is very clear and well laid out. It's one of the best introductions I've seen. He introduces some basic concepts (and assures you that using a command line to do stuff really isn't as hard as you might think), and then quickly jumps to providing some easy and practical exercises that help the information stick. Speaking as a novice command line guy, it's a great reference chapter to keep on hand, as it gathers most of the common functions that you might want to quickly use on a regular basis.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for david-r-perry

Article Author: David R Perry

Lost somewhere in the rolling hills of Tennessee, David R Perry can occasionally be found doing dark, unspeakable things to words. Printed words, spoken words, electronically mangled words... really any kind but twittered words.

Visit David R Perry's author pageDavid R Perry's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Aladdin Sane

    Sep 16, 2006 at 8:27 pm

    (Warning: Pedantry alert.)

    Thanks, David. Your review was well worth reading, because it utterly failed to be 'dry.'

    Some opinions from a long-time CLI (Command Line Interface) user:

    You used the phrase "common functions" in reference to the CLI. What you meant was "common commands." The distinction is vital for a few reasons:

    1) Most CLI's have functions, but they are not "newbie-friendly," in other words functions are for advanced CLI users.

    2) Naming consistency and convention. It was very very hard in the 70's/early 80's to learn how to use a PC. One big hurdle as a teenager trying to learn was that the engineers who wrote the manuals were notoriously inconsistent in their English usage. Sometimes they still are. As a reader of reviews I hope to find these ambiguities absent, for the sake of the newbie and "future history."

    Next, you used the slang term "distro" without first using the proper term "distribution" and at least defining it in this context.

    Finally, I say that this review, and the book it reviews, are a necessary part of a Linux advocates' toolkit. Thanks!

  • 2 - David R Perry

    Sep 19, 2006 at 9:32 am

    Hi Aladdin,

    Thanks for the feedback, and those are good points to keep in mind going forward.

    DP

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs