Book Review: The Michael Jackson Tapes: A Tragic Icon Reveals His Soul in Intimate Conversation By Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Insightful, surprising and heartbreaking, The Michael Jackson Tapes is a stunningly honest look under the surface of the late pop superstar.

Penned lovingly and carefully by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, the book is revealing and intimate without feeling exploitative or over-sentimental. The conversations outlined in The Michael Jackson Tapes came from a selection of recorded conversations in 2000-2001 between Jackson and Boteach. Jackson wanted Boteach, a rare trusted friend, to write the book upon completion of the tapes, but a series of events caused the Rabbi to reconsider.

Boteach goes to great lengths to explain why he thought now, after Jackson’s death, was the best time to complete and release the book. One senses the author’s pain when he describes how he and Jackson grew apart over time and how he was unable to be a positive influence in the pop star's life. Having been relegated to the sidelines in favor of Jackson’s parade of “yes-men,” Boteach withdrew from his friend’s life and watched the destruction overwhelm Michael from afar.

Boteach, shocked yet not surprised by the death of Michael Jackson, eventually chose to release the book some eight years after the interviews because he believed Jackson’s wishes should be finally fulfilled.

The conversations are arranged by subject matter in The Michael Jackson Tapes. Boteach interjects his “present day” self into the conversations frequently, offering a heartbreaking account of things he wished he would have said or things he was thinking. In this way, the book becomes a sort of disheartening record of a friendship shattered by time, fame and ego.

To say Jackson was a tragic figure would be an obvious understatement, but Boteach, in revealing these startlingly honest conversations, shows us a Michael Jackson motivated by one thing: love.

In talking to Boteach, Jackson reveals that his pursuit of fame and attention came out of a desire to be loved. He describes his relationship with his father, with women and with children. Through it all, through all the strangeness and deluded thoughts, Jackson’s motivation to be loved remains shockingly clear. The problem, according to Boteach, is that the King of Pop confused attention and adulation with love.

Judging from some of the reaction to the book, there are many who may think that Rabbi Boteach is overstepping his boundaries here or that he is being critical. I do not believe this to be the case for a number of reasons, the least of which is that Jackson wanted the tapes to be released.

Boteach’s interjections do, at times, come across as slightly disapproving, but one has to understand the standpoint of the author here. He was never a friend of Michael Jackson’s because he was a fan; he was, instead, a friend of Jackson’s because the pop star trusted him and craved his structure and opinion. For Boteach to gutlessly refuse to hold Jackson to the standards of their friendship, even after Jackson’s death, would be, in my view, the ultimate cruel evasion.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for jordan-richardson

Article Author: Jordan Richardson

Jordan Richardson is a Canadian freelance writer and maple syrup enthusiast. His film reviews can be found at the Canadian Cinephile's Reviews and his music reviews are located at the Canadian Audiophile's Reviews and News. Mr. …

Visit Jordan Richardson's author pageJordan Richardson's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • The Michael Jackson Tapes: A Tragic Icon Reveals His Soul in Intimate Conversation The Michael Jackson Tapes: A Tragic Icon Reveals His Soul in Intimate...

    In 2000-2001, Michael Jackson sat down with his close friend and spiritual guide, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, to record what turned out to be the most intimate and revealing conversations of his life. ...

Article comments

  • 1 - sue

    Oct 31, 2009 at 10:23 am

    I wonder if he's just not "cashing in" like everybody else. How many YEARS had it been since he had spoken to Michael? Eight?

    I think he could at least have waited until AFTER THE FUNERAL. What would God think about that?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 26, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs