Book Review: The Medical Science of House, M.D. by Andrew Holtz

Part of: House

If I had a tendency towards megalomania, I might think The Medical Science of House, M.D. was written specifically for me. It fills such a peculiar niche, I can't quite imagine the broader audience for it.

House happens to be my favourite show at the moment. It's not, however, even the highest rated medical show on the air; that would be Grey's Anatomy. And the book doesn't explore the world of Hugh Laurie's alter ego in any depth. It's mostly a Dummies Guide to the Health Care Industry, with the show as its jumping off point, so anyone reading specifically for real insight into House might be disappointed.

That said, I really enjoyed it. But I'm a nerd.

Author Andrew Holtz, a health journalist with a Master's of Public Health degree, writes with obvious affection for the show and careful recognition that fiction has no duty to strict reality. For the most part, he refers to the show's cases that, while improbable, are possible.

At times, he gently points out where the cases depart from reality, but always in order to make some broader point. For example, the treatment of House's Vicodin addiction in the "Detox" episode is one clear example of the show deviating from medical reality. The episode's proof of addiction — withdrawal symptoms — are no proof at all, say the real-life doctors. But Holtz doesn't dwell on the bent truth, except to mention the reality the fiction illuminates; he uses the case to bring up the very real problem of impaired physicians.

The author brings expert testimony, through research and interviews, to a discussion that's often quite unrelated to any specifics of House. Holtz's purpose is not to nitpick the show, or to glorify it as an example of medical realism, but to wrap a discussion of the health care industry and medical ethics in a palatable coating. The lengthy, explanatory sidebars — which are, unfortunately, confusingly presented in the middle of the main narrative — usually don't even pretend to be connected to the show.

Still, it's an interesting discussion for those who aren't intimately familiar with the system or all the issues. It's perhaps especially so for us non-Americans who might relish an engaging lesson in the U.S. health care system we think we know so much about, usually from fictional sources.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for diane-kristine

Article Author: Diane Kristine Wild

Diane writes about boring things by day, pop culture things by night. She also runs the TV, Eh? website, a compilation of news about Canadian television. Follow her on Twitter @deekayw for more random thoughts.

Visit Diane Kristine Wild's author pageDiane Kristine Wild's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • The Medical Science of House, M.D. The Medical Science of House, M.D.

    The facts behind the addictive medical drama starring Golden Globe winner Hugh Laurie. Week after week, House, M.D. has held viewers' attention with brilliant cast performances and intriguing diagnostic ...

  • House, M.D. - Season Two House, M.D. - Season Two
  • House, M.D. - Season One House, M.D. - Season One

Article comments

  • 1 - Morgenstern

    Oct 19, 2006 at 6:08 pm

    "It's perhaps especially so for us non-Americans who might relish an engaging lesson in the US health care system we think we know so much about, usually from fictional sources."
    Looks like I will have to buy that book, seeing that my view of the medical system in the US was largely formed by Samuel Shem's "House of God" (no, it's not a typo, it's not called "House is God"). *cough, cough* ;o)

  • 2 - Bell

    Jan 08, 2008 at 10:33 pm

    I saw the episode, 1-08-08, where the patient came in thinking he had Fibromyalgia and Fatique Syndrome. Dr. House went to the candy machine got a hand full of candy,put it in a med-bottle and gave it to the patient. I have both disorders and all that goes with them. That sent such a negative message to the public.It is hard enough to get the medical community as well as family members to take these auto-immune disodeers seriously, and that one scene did not help. The writers did not deal intelligently with a very serious illness, not to mention the pain Fibromyalgia causes.

  • 3 - Diane Kristine

    Jan 08, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    That's the pilot episode from 2004. The point was that the patient did not have fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue. Because if he did, he wouldn't have responded to a placebo. In other words, the "message" of the scene is they're real illnesses.

  • 4 - Bell

    Jan 09, 2008 at 11:56 pm

    Thank you very much. I understood that the patient did not have either. Do you think that viewrs will accept that scene as the patiernt did not have f/cfd or that there aren't such illnesse?

  • 5 - Diane Kristine

    Jan 10, 2008 at 12:01 am

    I guess it depends on how astute the viewer is. Most probably didn't give it a thought either way, to tell the truth! But I'm not sure you can fault the show even if people misunderstand the scene's intention (because you're not the only one with those illnesses upset by that scene ... you're just a little later than most of them :)

  • 6 - Bell

    Jan 14, 2008 at 7:01 pm

    Thank you very much for responding. "House" is one of my favorite programs. Glad to hear some others actually paid attention to that scene. Much success with the sale of your Book. Bell

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 12, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs