Book Review: The Means - A Literary Journal, Issue Two

I have in my hands Issue Two of The Means, a new literary magazine. Purple Post-It® notes flap out from certain pages, but I'll get to the journal's choice bits in a minute. First let us reflect on the meaning of The Means.

The Internet has drastically changed our relationship to knowledge and information, but for literature we still turn to books. I suspect that having a solid object to hold and read from is integral to the way we want to ingest long works. Though millions of us happily read newspapers on the Web, looking at a computer screen is not a comfortable way to read for a long period, nor is it conducive to the state of absorption that we usually want from a book.

The continuing popularity of printed magazines, for their part, can be largely attributed to convenience. In a waiting room, or taking the train to work, people want to flip through short, easily digested articles in something that's disposable.

Whither, then, the literary journal? Can a printed book-magazine hybrid maintain readership in the digital age? Old brands and habits die hard, and I wouldn't expect venerable titles like The Paris Review and Poetry to vanish any time soon. The Council of Literary Magazines and Presses lists hundreds of members. Still, it might well be seen as folly to be starting a litmag in the age of Google and Wikipedia. So when a new journal publishes its Issue Two, one can't help being a wee bit impressed.

Co-editor Tanner Higgin declares that while The Means is "labeled a literary journal, our editorial direction has no allegiance to mere fiction and poetry. Rather, we read everything sent to us and choose what's good. It truly is as simple as that... interviews, lists, essays, humor, art, comics, and anything else that can be slapped on to a piece of paper are fair game." Alas, he goes on to abuse the language he has implied he loves: "The truth is that most [literary] publications are running on a shoestring budget with no readership and thus function as poorly compensated, careless behemoths with little to no interest in costly innovation or the acceptance of risky writing by unproven writers."

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for jon-sobel

Article Author: Jon Sobel

Jon Sobel is Co-Executive Editor of Blogcritics. As a writer he contributes most often to the Culture section, where he often reviews NYC theater; he also writes a semi-regular review round-up of independent music releases. …

Visit Jon Sobel's author pageJon Sobel's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Gordon Hauptfleisch

    Jan 09, 2007 at 2:33 am

    Nice article--glad you could highlight what seems a worthy endeavor.

  • 2 - Tanner

    Jan 09, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    We appreciate the review Jon.

    One note, it is Christopher Monks and not Marks.

    But I guess that's what not having an editor for the editor gets you!

  • 3 - Natalie Bennett

    Jan 09, 2007 at 6:04 pm

    This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net, which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States. Nice work!

  • 4 - Gbanabom Hallowell

    Mar 15, 2007 at 9:49 pm

    Good!!!!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 10, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs