Book Review: The Man Who Sold America: Albert D. Lasker and the Creation of the Advertising Century by Jeffrey L. Cruikshank and Arthur W. Schultz

Defining the legacy of Albert D. Lasker, the paradoxical pioneer who paved the way for 20th century advertising and molded modern consumer response, was a challenging task, admits the authors of The Man Who Sold America: The Amazing (but True!) Story of Albert D. Lasker and the Creation of the Advertising Century. For one thing, Jeffrey L. Cruikshank and Arthur W. Schultz found in their evidence and research that Lasker was prone to overstate, elaborate, and fabricate his life’s events, generating “so much electricity — and static – around himself that the reality of his life tended to be hidden from its observers.” And moreover, “Lasker tried consciously to obscure his own role in almost all that he did – to remain the man behind the curtain,” while others took the spotlight.

The Oz-like enigma, who extended his role into politics, professional sports, and other institutional and cultural mainstays, also contributed to confusion in his colleagues, such as the terminated executive who at the same time he grumbled that Lasker is the only man he’d like to murder, also mumbled, “There isn’t a finer man living.” Or the former associate, leaving under duress, declaring “I’d like to kick him in the back,” then following up in unashamedly glowing terms: “I have never met a man as colorful and virile and as personable as Mr. Albert Lasker. Never.”

In any case, the wherewithal’s in the details culled from a recently discovered trove of Lasker's papers — and perhaps the head-scratching complexities are just the qualifications the job calls for. “Orator and entrepreneur, statesman and pioneer, depressive and overachiever:” Cruikshank and Schultz contend, “These conflicting legacies would advance Albert Lasker’s career, shape his emotions, and dictate his dreams.”
Indeed, as Lasker faced the tasks at hand, his biographers here are up to the challenge – as they amply demonstrate in their seamless and subtly undertaken exploration and elucidation — of reconciling the moodiness of the "super-salesman of the generation" (according to Will Hays, political puppet-master and cultural gadabout and gadfly) with the sweetness and light of the effectual, successful, and stuck-in-your-head advertisements, commercials, and marketing campaigns developed for such household names as Kleenex, Pepsodent, and Sunkist. Quaker Oats Puffed Rice and Puffed Wheat cereals were "foods shot from guns,” Palmolive soap could give you "beauty appeal," and, when the rubber meets the road, it’s Goodyear "all-weather" tires all the way.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for gordon-hauptfleisch

Article Author: Gordon Hauptfleisch

Gordon Hauptfleisch is a Blogcritics Books Editor, freelance writer, and book reviewer for San Diego Union Tribune Books (R.I.P.). For many years he worked in and managed bookstores and record stores, and most recently was purchasing manager for San Diego Technical Books. …

Visit Gordon Hauptfleisch's author pageGordon Hauptfleisch's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - jeannie danna

    Sep 06, 2010 at 5:39 pm

    Interesting, the selling of political figures actually started in 1920. I thought it was a more recent practice.

    My question is, "Will it ever end?"


    Good article, Gordon

  • 2 - Gordon Hauptfleisch

    Sep 07, 2010 at 12:25 am

    Thanks, Jeannie: There were enough under-the-counter transactions going on before 1920 too, back into the 19th century. And no, it will never end.

  • 3 - jeannie danna

    Sep 07, 2010 at 4:52 am

    Gordon,

    We are being over-sold in this country. I bet that even, Mr. Lasker, would agree.

    It's a shame that I can't drive 1/4 mile without seeing obnoxiously-huge billboards, in my region anyway. I go to the larger cities and now see billboards that are digitally-moving-videos; what I can't figure out about these are why they are allowed to distract drivers. Yet, txting and talking on cell phones while driving are banned. Both, cell-phones and billboards should be banned! I'm guessing that we have to wait until enough deadly accidents are directly caused by them, before anything will be done.

    I don't know how you feel about this issue, but I believe that consumerism plagues us all.

    JD

  • 4 - Jeff Cruikshank

    Sep 13, 2010 at 4:04 am

    I'm the author of the book at hand. Very thoughtful review, Mr. Hauptfleisch. Great job.

  • 5 - Gordon Hauptfleisch

    Sep 13, 2010 at 8:18 pm

    I appreciate the kind words, Mr. Cruikshank. Thank you.

  • 6 - Gordon Hauptfleisch

    Sep 29, 2010 at 11:32 am

    jeannie: I very much prefer consumerism to a society that would ban it -- even including the billboards and cell phones you mention.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs