What happened once upon a while ago, was that a friend announced to The Duke something along the lines of "Folks who read Terry Pratchett have no imagination." I found this a rather bewildering generalization, and one, alas, that proved that the very intelligent individual didn't, in fact, have much of a clue about the work of Mr Pratchett.
Like so many (like, in fact, The Duke at one time), our anonymous critic assumed Mr Pratchett to be a purveyor of the kindsa nonsense one might find in fantasy trilogies about distant planets populated by drilling operations and three-headed octopi beasts.
Whilst technically, I guess, Pratchett can fit snugly enough beside the likes of Trilogy Of Isenfangle or whatever the hell in the old book emporiums, the truth is that what Pratchett writes about, is the right-now. The society and such. For sure, he sets things in bizarre, curiously mundane environments (as opposed to the flamboyant, enchanting lands of similar scribes), but what he's talking about is shit you see on the old news and such every evening, unless you turn it to The Simpsons after the soaps.
In fact, if you dig the subversive nature of The Simpsons, then probably this'll rock your boat somewhat, too. Or at least give it a good kick, a mild shudder perhaps resulting. Just like The Simpsons, this is a recognizable environment, recognizable issues being addressed, but lovably daft nonetheless.
Terry Pratchett is a brilliant, wickedly funny satirist. That his characters might be Golems or giant elephant things is neither here nor there.
So the fact of the matter is that I've wanted to read some Pratchett for some time, but had less than the hint of a possible clue about where the hell to start. I knew something about this ongoing Discworld carry-on, and assumed that what you needed to do was to read the first one first, and then go ahead with no.2, no.3 and so on, in chronological order.








Article comments
1 - Aaman
For a non-follower of pterrry, as he is known on Usenet, you've done a great job with this review, Duke. Most of the characters are indeed from previous tales of the vast alti-verse that is Discworld. The most sorely missed character in this one is Death who SPEAKS LIKE THIS, and has a view on life, well, all his own.
Lord Vetinari is a real master at manipulation, as you've doubtless seen from "Going Postal" - I compared him to someone real in an earlier post.
Pterry is going to continue writing till they nail him in his coffin, and perhaps after that too - enjoy the reading - you've got about 25 other books to go.
2 - The Theory
I love Pratchett... I've read a handful of the Discworld novels, which I don't think need to be read in order, as there isn't any continuing storyline, nor a solid re-occuring character who takes the hero role in each book. My favorite thing he's done has to be "Good Omens", which he co-wrote with Neal Giaman. One of the best books ever.
3 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo
Thanks folks!
Aaman, i've heard about the death character, and one time went so far as to lift Deat Takes A Holiday (i think that's what it was called) from the shelves with the intent of purchase. In the end i think i bought something obscenely violent by Clive Barker.
Theory, i'll check out Good Omens. It does me good to know there's no particular narrative continuity going on.
Incidentally, do either of you know if the animated thingys are any good?
Cheers
4 - Forough Farshad
Dear Mr.Pratchett
I have read your book(A Hat full of Sky)and there are some words and expressions I can't get through.I couldn't find other ways to contact you since I live in Iran.Is it possible I ask you the questions through email?It will be very nice of you to answer my mail.Your answer is very important for me.
Thank you
Forough
5 - Aaman
Try [edited -- no emails please, even when being helpful 8-)] - but don't spam
6 - Victor Plenty
Asking people "please don't spam" is a bit futile in a forum that is itself frequently targeted by spambots.
7 - MKK
Pratchett definitely on teh up again (I was doubtful after 'A Hat Full Of Sky') - I daresay this may even be [one of] his best yet.