Book Review: Murder at the Washington Tribune by Margaret Truman - Page 2

As the Tribune's journalists try to solve the case before the police, the two groups quickly evolve into distrustful, suspicious camps. For the police, they see no reason to allow byline-hungry reporters to get in the way of their investigation; the reporters, of course, regard the police as obstructionist. Wilcox steps into the midst of this situation; spearheading the Tribune's investigation, he tries to use his own brother, recently released from a mental institution for killing a young woman, as the basis for a fictional serial killer. But when a reporter starts to manufacture the news, how long before it becomes difficult to differentiate fact from fiction?

Wilcox finds himself risking is career, his marriage, and even the life of his own daughter, a beautiful rising star in TV news, in his personal bid for vindication and journalistic glory. And much like Wilder's cinematic protagonist, a great many people may be hurt by Wilcox's bid to have the story serve his interests, rather than simply report upon what exists.

While some of the novel's plot twists are not the most believable, Truman offers a good portrait of a middle-aged man trying to recapture his former glory. Wilcox struggles to grasp at that which is just beyond reach, and in the process finds his life spiraling rapidly out of his control. Ultimately, the story here is not in the murder mystery itself, as the novel is something of a mirror image of Ace in the Hole - a cautionary tale in which the news is that reporters often discard notions of journalistic integrity in the pursuit of personal glory and ambition. In that regard, at least, it rings true.

Author's Note: This article was originally posted at Wallo World.

Wallo World

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for bill-wallo

Article Author: Bill Wallo

Bill Wallo is a book and movie junkie.

Visit Bill Wallo's author pageBill Wallo's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Nancy

    Nov 28, 2005 at 1:40 pm

    Shades of Bob Woodward, Robert Novak, Judith Miller, & a host of others!

  • 2 - BIll Wallo

    Nov 28, 2005 at 3:36 pm

    I think that might depend upon one's perspective of the Woodward/Novak/Miller thing. They certainly found themselves at the center of a story; it doesn't appear that they manufactured or falsified anything in order to make a name for themselves.

  • 3 - Nancy

    Nov 28, 2005 at 3:48 pm

    They didn't cooperate with Fitzgerald, & in Woodward's case, didn't tell anyone - including the Post - they actually had extensive testimony pertaining to the case, in order to further their own personal interests; so in a very strong sense, they 'led' circumstances along for the purposes of self-aggrandizement.

  • 4 - vikk

    Nov 28, 2005 at 11:54 pm

    Another well-thought out review. Thanks!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.