Book Review: King Kong - From Fay Wray to Peter Jackson by Ray Morton - Page 2

Still, 1986's laugh fest King Kong Lives is given more pages than both the Japanese films combined. That's not a complaint, just a disappointment that the foreign efforts are pushed to the side. However, nothing has been written on the horribly produced sequel to the 1976 US version, and this book covers some great material. Interviews with actors who freely admit what a mess it was, deaths in multiple families while the movie was shooting, budget crunches, and an irritable director keep Morton's enjoyable detailing engrossing.

The author doesn't stop there either. His brief snippets on knock-off films (the miserable Queen Kong included), spin-offs like Mighty Joe Young, and a small chapter dedicated to collectibles help round out the pages. Sadly, the book was published before the release of Peter Jackson's 2005 edition of the classic story, so it feels incomplete. Only basic details, which include a rundown of a 1997 script from Jackson, are written here. An excessive amount of editing errors are slightly distracting as well.

Though not complete, a few of the chapters would have made fine books on their own. For a dedicated Kong fanatic, or someone who loves to read on the process of filmmaking, this is a fantastic piece of work. As of now, this is as close to a definitive work as we'll ever see.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for matt-paprocki

Article Author: Matt Paprocki

Matt Paprocki is a 12-year movie and game critic. He currently freelances for Blu-ray review site DoBlu.com and video game site MultiPlayerGames.com.

Visit Matt Paprocki's author pageMatt Paprocki's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Monkey king

    Sep 02, 2006 at 11:30 pm

    Any would-be web reviewer never misses an easy opportunity to jump on the band wagon and bag on the 1976 version. "Bloated" Is not a word I would use to describe the brisk, well acted, well shot, fantastically scored, and entertaining 70's film. ALL the Kong films have thier unique imperfections and shortcommings. Morton's Book is terrific, but leave the 1976 film alone already!

  • 2 - Matt Paprocki

    Sep 02, 2006 at 11:42 pm

    Bloated is the right word. They went well over $10 million on the budget end. Brisk isn't the right word either. The pacing simply can't keep up.

    The effects are of course a sore spot, especially the two completely distracting moments where the giant robot Kong pops up miserably on screen. The jungle sequences are off due a lack of Kong fighting, well, anything. That's a crucial portion of the original story. Don't even get me started on the giant snake fight that was beyond laughable. The team did create one hell of a great suit though, especially the face.

    The movie was rushed to beat Universal and their remake that never actually happened, and it shows. Yes, it does have some great moments, and the build on the Kong/Dwan relationship gives the film something to fall back on emotionally when he's eventually shot down. Aside from that, it's a dull, overly long (and the same of course for Jackson's update) update that was released too early before it was finished.

  • 3 - Monkey King

    Sep 04, 2006 at 8:57 am

    Matt, you stated your opinion already in your blog. Someone disagrees with it.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs