And finally there is Anthony Wood, an author. Wood comes across more sympathetically, much like in his autobiography (understandably; not many people think ill of themselves). He has a favourable opinion of himself, but inclines towards uncharitability when discussing others. Wood's avocation renders him vital to the story; a packrat, he spends his days cataloging and reading manuscripts in the Oxford library, when not deep into reading his books. A true historian, he desires only to show the truth as best he knows it.
All four accounts are believable, and they all tie-in to each other remarkably well.
Underlying it all are competing notions of truth. They relate the events surrounding a murder as they’ve come to understand it. Each has his own knowledge, perspective, and motive in his personal telling. Several prominent figures from history, John Locke and Robert Boyle among them, are also written in as participants to the action making the story more believable. There are citations from Francis Bacon, the father of the scientific revolution, to provide sign-posts to the continuing unfolding mystery.
This tale is entertaining and though long, Pears’ work as art historian, consultant and journalist enables him to lay out a compelling and intelligently written mystery, comprising a search for real truth, precise and accurate in every word. Against this backdrop of English Restoration, Pears has woven a wonderful story of darkness and shadows. A must for anyone who likes good literature mixed with history and an exciting plot.
There are so many aspects to this book that I could write a review as long as the book just to cover them. If I have any criticism of this book, it’s that it is wordy and not what could be considered a page-turner. Because of the time it takes to get though it, this one is only for the serious readers who love the genre and good writing.
Having said that, I would highly recommend it for those who enjoyed Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose.
Article comments