Book Review: Female Chauvinist Pigs by Ariel Levy

Ariel Levy's book Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture takes on pop culture's objectification of women, and the new breed of Paris Hilton wannabes who willingly go along, exploiting their own bodies and degrading their sexuality.

The rise of the "raunch culture," embodied by the ubiquitous Girls Gone Wild videos and the mainstreaming of pornography, represents a backlash against the anti-porn feminism of the 1970s. The popular culture now glorifies women as sexual beings, for sure, but at a price: women's liberation is now bound up in high-heeled combat boots, S&M leather and lace, and body images that fulfill male fantasies of lascivious women with no agenda beyond the bedroom.

When teenaged girls (and even younger) where thongs and t-shirts that proclaim the wearer as a "porn star," and real porn stars like Jenna Jameson are lauded as feminist icons, Levy argues, something is desperately wrong. Women have traded the Feminist Mystique for the erotic boutique.

Levy's dissection of these pop trends hints at a deeper problem with our culture's conception of what is rebellious and what is cool. Instead of agitating for equality in women's health care or equal pay for women, today's version of anti-establishment action is to pierce your naval and learn how to perform a strip-tease, what Levy coins "raunch feminism."

In an interview with Playboy CEO Christie Hefner (daughter of Hugh), Levy elicits this response to a question of why women are so interested in posing for the iconic men's magazine:

... The post-sexual revolution, post-women's movement generation that is now in their late twenties and early thirties--and then it continues with the generation behind them, too--has just a more grown-up, comfortable, natural attitude about sex and sexiness that is more in line with where guys were a couple generations before. The rabbit head symbolizes sexy fun, a little bit of rebelliousness, the same way a navel ring does ... or low-rider jeans! It's an obvious "I'm taking control of how I look and the statement I'm making," as opposed to "I'm embarrassed about it," or, "I'm uncomfortable with it."

Levy chides a group of self-proclaimed feminists, founders of the group CAKE, who argue that throwing elaborate parties featuring strippers and pornography is, in fact, radical feminism.

The authors of Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism and the Future, Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards, tell Levy that dancing at a strip club, or even watching the cult TV show"Xena" is akin to volunteering at a rape crisis center or speaking out at Take Back the Night.

Levy writes:

Throwing a party where women grind against each other in their underwear while fully-clothed men watch them is suddenly part of the same project as marching on Washington for reproductive rights. According to Baumgardner and Richards, "watching TV shows (Zena! Buffy!) can ... contain feminism in action." Based on these examples, it woul seem raunch feminism is easy to achieve: The basic requirements are hot girls and small garments.

Feminism comes to mean sexiness as lionized by the popular culture. And women who buy into these commercialized images of liberation are choosing style over substance. When fighting oppression means buying the right type of clothes, or watching pornography and "feminist" TV programs like Xena or Desperate Housewives, politics becomes irrelevant.

This has been an essential formulation of the counter-culture since the 1960s, when wearing jeans or long hair was a political statement. In the last 40 years, however, fashion and other trappings of pop consumerism have served no one better than the companies who learned to use '60s iconoclasm as a marketing tool. The Revolution has been commoditized.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Bob A. Booey

    Sep 21, 2005 at 7:46 am

    Wow, great job, John. I'm very impressed -- I'll keep my eyes out for you other writing on this site. This should definitely be a Pick of the Week.

    And you're reading some great stuff.

    That is all.

  • 2 - Temple Stark

    Sep 25, 2005 at 10:27 pm

    Impressive.

    I forgot everything I read with this ending though: See more thoughts at count dookie.

  • 3 - Temple Stark

    Sep 25, 2005 at 10:35 pm

    Books Editor Pat picked this his pick of the week. Go HERE to find out why. and thank you very much.

  • 4 - fnord

    Oct 03, 2005 at 3:20 pm

    >>> Being able to have an orgasm with a man you don't love, or ... that is not liberation. ... the problem is: You're not going to elect Carrie to the Senate or to run your company.

    (Sigh) The same old error in thinking: "they're doing A, therefore nothing is happening with doing B." They're having more fun with sex, and so that means there won't be more women in the Senate or at the top of businesses. Hellooooo ... people can affect more than one issue at a time, especially when one issue is "recreational", shall we say, compared to the other. Male senators, and business leaders, apparently do not have to give up a strongly-expressed sexuality to be where _they_ are, so why should women?

    It's the usual advocacy-fallacy of "No, don't do that!! Do this!!" Helloooo ... people can do *both* 'that' *and* 'this'.

  • 5 - Tara NY

    Jun 13, 2006 at 7:43 pm

    Everything in moderation. As part of this so-called sexually liberated generation the fact that women lose control of their sexuality by believing it is all that empowers them rings all too true. It does not mean we should give up our right to be sexually empowered, but that we have an obligation to our minds as well. Being healthy and loving life should not require a compromise of mind over body. Having fun times does not mean a person is happy overall. Having been there in every sense, and knowing that most men hardly enjoy my intellect as much as my face and my figure, I know that this well named "raunch feminism" is a disgrace to the ideals of feminism altogether. If this is how women are convincing themselves to become feminists once again, then I suggest we revert back to Betty Friedan. Her brand of radical allowed women to put on jeans, and never implied that women should empower themselves by turning to self degradation.

  • 6 - Lauren

    Oct 11, 2006 at 10:13 pm

    You're hiding, John Zorbedian. Don't. You have good stuff to say, I think. Don't be sceered - come back. I look for people like you, found you with your really good Ariel Levy review, searched and you're gone...
    Real human,
    Lauren

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.

blogcritics lists for Jul 10, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for June

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs