Book Review: Columbine: A True Crime Story, A Victim, The Killers and the Nation's Search For Answers by Jeff Kass - Page 3

Then, we are lead through the social and political aftermath of the shooting, a tense period rife with moral indignation. This fury targeted everything from lax school security and Goth and gun culture, to the use of pharmaceuticals and anti-depressants by teenagers, to parental supervision of the Internet, high school cliques, bullying, and the wantonly violent movies, video games, and magazines that allegedly whetted the shooters’ appetites. Too, Kass highlights the family of victim Isiah Schoel, framing their struggle to come to terms with his murder.

Ten years later, dealing with and attempting to understand evildoing still proves no easy matter.

Ultimately, what Columbine: A True Story does so well is to connect these dots, threads, and documents, leading us closer to an “answer” – if finding a satisfactory “answer” is even possible. Haunting, unforgiving, and chilling, it adds one more layer of reality to a horrendous event that no adequate emotional or mental appeal will ever quite mitigate.

From the galvanization of this sordid, painful, hopeful book, perhaps we can we learn — and relearn — from what happened at Columbine, and, most importantly, we can somehow apply its lessons to avert similar tragedies.

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for brian-d-ambrosio

Article Author: Brian D'Ambrosio

Brian D'Ambrosio is a Montana writer and the author of five books, including From Haikus to Hatmaking: A Year in the Life of Western Montana.

Visit Brian D'Ambrosio's author pageBrian D'Ambrosio's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - John Byrnes

    Apr 18, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    Research has determined that from the Moment of Commitment (the point when a student pulls their weapon) to the Moment of Completion (when the last round is fired) is only 5 seconds. If it is the intent of a school district to react to this violence, they will do so over the wounded and/or slain bodies of students, teachers and administrators.

    Educational institutions clearly want safe and secure schools. Administrators are perennially queried by parents about the safety of their schools. The commonplace answers, intended to reassure anxious parents, focus on the school resource officers and emergency procedures. While useful, these less than adequate efforts do not begin to provide a definitive answer to preventing school violence, nor do they make a school safe and secure.

    Traditionally school districts have relied upon the mental health community or local police to keep schools safe, yet one of the key shortcomings has been the lack of a system that involves teachers, administrators, parents and students in the identification and communication process. Recently, colleges, universities and community colleges are forming Behavioral Intervention Teams with representatives from all these constituencies. Higher Education has changed their safety/security policies, procedures, or surveillance systems, yet K-12 have yet to incorporate Behavioral Intervention Teams. K-12 schools continue spending excessive amounts of money to put in place many of the physical security options. Sadly, they are reactionary only and do little to prevent aggression because they are designed exclusively to react to existing conflict, threat and violence. These schools reflect a national blindspot, which prefers hardening targets through enhanced security versus preventing violence with efforts directed at aggressors. Security gets all the focus and money, but this only makes us feel safe, rather than to actually make us safer.

    Some law enforcement agencies use profiling as a means to identify an aggressor. According to the U.S. Secret Service and the U.S. Department of Education's report on Targeted Violence in Schools, there is a significant difference between "profiling" and identifying and measuring emerging aggression; "The use of profiles is not effective either for identifying students who may pose a risk for targeted violence at school or - once a student has been identified - for assessing the risk that a particular student may pose for school-based targeted violence." It continues; "An inquiry should focus instead on a student's behaviors and communications to determine if the student appears to be planning or preparing for an attack." We can and must assess objective, culturally neutral, identifiable criteria of emerging aggression.

    For a comprehensive look at the problem and its solution.

  • 2 - starviego

    Apr 18, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    You are still being lied to. Big time. If you want to find out what really happened at Columbine I suggest you read what the eyewitnesses had to say.

  • 3 - james jay

    Apr 08, 2011 at 6:08 am

    I agree Kass' book is excellent,and has much exclusive information. It is not only the definitive book on Columbine, but the only one to connect the dots between school shootings across the country.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs