Book Review: Ancient Gonzo Wisdom: Interviews with Hunter S. Thompson edited by Anita Thompson

Since shortly after his suicide on February 20, 2005, there has been a steady stream of books, and even a documentary, reflecting upon the man and the myth that was writer Hunter S. Thompson. But as he believed and documented with his writing style, dubbed Gonzo journalism, the best way to cover a story, to get to the truth of it, is to be right at the center, making Hunter himself the best person to cover his own story, which he details through a series of interviews from 1967 to 2005.

While sharing at least five interviews with the previously released Conversations with Hunter S. Thompson, Ancient Gonzo Wisdom is a marvelous read for fans, almost similar to his series, The Fear and Loathing Letters.  Hunter, by way of his editor and widow Anita Thompson, presents an autobiography of sorts through his responses to questions in print, in a lecture hall, on television, and online. Anita does a great job providing footnotes to make clear what is being discussed in the conversations.

The questioners are an odd mix, mostly of fellow journalists, nowhere near as successful, who come at Hunter from different perspectives. There are fawning fans like the women of Albuquerque’s NuCity Press (1995) that bring up his “secret reputation as a pretty sexy guy” which he wasn’t aware of. Others act confrontational, figuring an interview with Hunter gives them license to act the outlaw. Judd Rose of ABC’s Primetime Live (1992), in a piece about the city of Aspen, startles Hunter, at the request of friend David Rosenthal, by opening with “who do you like better: Negroes or Jews?” Then there are the downright foolish, such as Peter Olszewski of Australia’s Loose Licks (1976). He asks Hunter to imagine taking some ultra-powerful acid that would cause him to reincarnate and then queries, “Who would you come back as?” I was stunned someone bothered to ask him if drugs should be legalized, as if there was any doubt?

Ancient Gonzo Wisdom is best taken in small doses because apparently interviewers didn’t do much research of Hunter or his previous interviews as a lot of the same ground gets covered. Multiple times, with slight variances to the story, we get his responses to subjects like why he got stomped by some Hell’s Angels, the creation of his Kentucky Derby story, the meaning of “gonzo,” working with illustrator Ralph Steadman, and his run for Sheriff of Aspen. Also, there were many questions about how much of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is true, as if that would matter. Besides, a magician never reveals his tricks.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for el-bicho

Article Author: El Bicho

This writer is a member of The Masked Movie Snobs, a collective that fights a never-ending battle against bad entertainment. Follow at twitter.com/ElBicho_MMS

Visit El Bicho's author pageEl Bicho's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Ancient Gonzo Wisdom: Interviews with Hunter S. Thompson Ancient Gonzo Wisdom: Interviews with Hunter S. Thompson

    Bristling with inspired observations and wild anecdotes, this first collection offers a unique insight into the voice and mind of the inimitable Hunter S. Thompson, as recorded in the pages of Playboy, ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Greg Barbrick

    Sep 08, 2009 at 7:39 am

    Nice review. As a modern day writer, I can only compare him to Bukowski, whose life became the story more than his actual writing did.

    It's funny because as his writing diminished, his legend only grew. Kind of sad as well. Thanks for the tip on the Jay Cowan book, it is one I will be seeking out.

  • 2 - El Bicho

    Sep 08, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    Thanks, Greg

  • 3 - Wilson Knut

    Sep 09, 2009 at 5:52 pm

    Good review. I've been a Thompson fan for some time. The documentary also touches on the "role" he felt he had to play once he found success. Interesting stuff about the '76 campaign.

  • 4 - El Bicho

    Sep 09, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    Thanks, WK. I don't know how much he actually had to play it. Sure, it's the role some liked to see him in, but from all I have read I believe it was easier and also lucrative. Why put in the hard work and possible disappoint of competing with yourself when just showing up wasted paid the bills and had little perceived downside?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 09, 2010

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs

Upcoming Stories from Blogcritics
  •