One last thing, since this has gone on too long and I want to leave you with your own thoughts. Scarry mentions the writer Gerald Manly Hopkins who speaks, as many poets do, to the disappointment we feel when a particular object or person perceived as beautiful is no longer perceived as such - somehow they morph or change, or we morph or change or our perception does and here is what he wrote:
Is this made plain? What have I come across
That here will serve me for comparison?
The sceptic disappointment and the loss
A boy feels when the poet he pores upon
Grows less and less sweet to him and knows no cause."
Or Emily Dickinson, who writes of a thing that had,
"dropped so low in my regard,
I heard it hit the ground."
We know of such disappointment. We've all felt it - the falling out of love, the end of the crush, the beauty we used to see, or worse, that we perhaps were the beauty and are now unseen (like Lady Di surely felt, scorned for this other woman who surely she compared herself to - the thought of it pains me, for if only she could see what so many others saw. I hope to god she did at the end at least… it seemed she reached a state of grace).
The loss of Beauty is devastating. The clock we once loved, gone to the storeroom. How fickle the heart. But the question remains: if it is not perceived, does it remain a thing of beauty? It's the same as the tree that falls in the wood; does it make a sound. If a thing exists somewhere but is never perceived, is it beautiful or not? Does beauty require perception? These are big weighty questions and I leave you today with these on your mind. I'm still sorting the whole thing out, but I think I've made some headway - certainly, Scarry has helped us identify some features, though in all honesty, Homer and Plato have said it all before. Read this, perhaps, but also go to the source - the ancient Greeks and read up for yourself. Never take someone else's word for it. Not even mine. Andre Breton said, "Beauty will be convulsive, or will not be at all." I think that's about as close as we get to the Truth.
sadi ranson-polizzotti








Article comments
1 - Robert Nagle
Trackback doesn't seem to be working. Here's a link to my thoughts on the matter.
2 - Eric Olsen
Aesthetics is my favorite philosophical topic and I waver between believing in a Platonic Beauty and much less satisfying reflexive concepts. Very interesting and lovely as always Sadi.
Robert, Trackback always works, it just doesn't show up on the page until the post is rebuilt - this is a flaw in our current system.
3 - sadi
thanks, Eric - Robert, i'm looking for your comment now...
Beauty is a great philosophical concept and discussion idea, but i think for me, we have to accept the notion that beauty is subjective , even if it causes a codified set of physical responses, i think it is always something that will ultimately be, in the real world anyway, subjective and not objective, and i think we've proven that time and time again...
I really enjoyed writing this piece, though it's a bit heavier than the usual for me, it was great fun.
Robert - can't access your comments. can you try posting again or shoot over an email.
back to my piece on the Race Riots of London in the Seventies - just posting that now.
rock on all,
sade