B.C. in the Doghouse

Johnny Hart, the creator of "B.C.," one of the "most widely read cartoonists on Earth," is taking flak for a recent cartoon strip that many suggest defamed Islam.

The cartoon, which appeared Nov. 10 in more than 1,200 newspapers worldwide — including The Washington Post — shows a caveman entering an outhouse at night, and then saying, from inside, "Is it just me, or does it stink in here?"

The first public questioning of this cartoon arose in a washingtonpost.com chat Tuesday, when a reader noted that the cartoon seemed to make no sense, except metaphorically. The reader noted that the cartoon contained six crescent moons — three in the sky, and three on the outhouse door — and wondered if this might have been a veiled slur on the world's 1 billion practicing Muslims.

The CAIR e-mail mentioned the moons, and also noted that Hart had drawn a prominent sound effect — "SLAM" — between two frames to accompany the closing of the outhouse door. The SLAM was stacked vertically, in the shape of an I, and could be seen to signify "Islam." The cartoon appeared on the 15th day of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month.

Hart claims it was a silly bathroom joke, although others aren't so sure:

"Why is the door slamming? You don't slam an outhouse door."

This is Marshall Blonsky, professor of semiotics at the New School in New York. Blonsky is an expert in the interpretation of signs and symbols. The first thing he said, on seeing the cartoon, is that he didn't get the joke. The second thing he said was that the outhouse is clearly serving some metaphoric purpose: "It represents something that stinks in the world." And the third thing he said was that there was something very puzzling about that SLAM.

"It's inappropriate," he said. "You gently close an outhouse door." One does not ordinarily enter an outhouse in anger or with a melodramatic flourish, he said. One utilizes this particular convenience in as unobtrusive a way as possible.

Blonsky said the cartoon seemed in some way manipulative — constructed in "a polysemic fashion, to supply multiple meanings that would deliberately evade interpretation." When told of the religious interpretation, he said that in this light, the cartoon suddenly made logical sense. The coincidences were simply too great to ignore, he said.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for w-e-wallo

Article Author: W.E. Wallo

W.E. Wallo is a book and movie junkie whose writings have appeared in a variety of print and online publications.

Visit W.E. Wallo's author pageW.E. Wallo's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Al Barger

    Nov 24, 2003 at 9:36 pm

    BC is defaming Islam? Islam has been doing a fine job of defaming itself. The fruits of Islam have been pretty stinky in modern history, regardless of the intentions behind some silly American cartoon.

  • 2 - Eric Olsen

    Nov 24, 2003 at 9:49 pm

    If Hart really did intend this, he is brilliant. I would never, ever have gathered the anti-Islam meaning if I hadn't been told. I think it's a real stretch, but I have no problem with the message: Islam is in a horrendous state of disrepair, it is rotting from within, corrupted by fascist terrorists and their fellow travelers. It reeks to the highest heavens in there, and will do so until it is cleaned up from within. I had no idea Hart had it in him.

  • 3 - Bill Wallo

    Nov 24, 2003 at 10:03 pm

    I keep going back and forth on it, to be honest. I think: what else COULD it mean? But then again, I'm very leery of super-sensitive overinterpretation, which I hate. Besides which, even if that was his opinion, it's just a cartoon.

    So I guess I look at it like this: if that's what he meant, he should say so. If not, then he probably shouldn't be tarred and feathered over it.

  • 4 - Al Barger

    Nov 24, 2003 at 10:07 pm

    GO HERE to see the cartoon that has apparently defamed the poopie religion.

  • 5 - Bill Wallo

    Nov 24, 2003 at 10:19 pm

    Ooh, note the subtle use of the gutter between the first panel and the second to create the "I" for the "SLAM"? Either way, it points out the interesting things you can do with comics. :)

  • 6 - Mac Diva

    Nov 25, 2003 at 12:29 am

    Bill, I become skeptical when people have to reach that hard to find a meaning in something. Whenever one of those 'Christ's face in a taco,' stories turn up I am annoyed for the same reason.

  • 7 - JR

    Nov 25, 2003 at 11:54 am

    If Johnny Hart's subconscious is that much cleverer than his conscious, he probably ought to take up drinking or drugs.

  • 8 - Eric Olsen

    Nov 25, 2003 at 12:02 pm

    or drinking drugs

  • 9 - Michael Croft

    Nov 25, 2003 at 12:13 pm

    I think the problem with Hart is that he hasn't been funny in years and hasn't be regularly funny in decades.

    While the vast majority of Hart's work is tedious, cliche-ridden crap ("the fat broad is touchy about her weight!"), sometimes it's not even clear what the so-called joke is supposed to be. People expect meaning and often (in a 'Deus ex TacoBell' way) find patterns where none were intended.

    While Hart is no stranger to religious controversy (it was about 2.5 years ago that he was accused of being insensitive to Jews for his Easter transformation of a menorah into a cross), I don't think he meant to be offensive.

    Given that the two competing explanations are that Hart used his strip to make a cryptic attack on Islam or that Hart published another unfunny, meaningless strip, I find the latter to be much more likely.

    What annoys me about Hart is not that he's insulting to any particular religion, but that he's insulting to everyone's intelligence. That the comics pages have been shrinking so that we can keep the crap on them is a shame.

  • 10 - Mark Saleski

    Nov 25, 2003 at 12:45 pm

    no kidding, i'll take Zippy The Pinhead any 'old day.

  • 11 - Hazy Dave

    Nov 26, 2003 at 12:44 pm

    For some reason, their archive doesn't go there anymore. Put this in your browser's URL box to see the strip in question:

    http://www.creators.com/1109/bc/bc1110g.
    gif

  • 12 - Hazy Dave

    Nov 26, 2003 at 12:48 pm

    Oops, the "gif" needs to be on the same line, of course:

    http://www.creators.com/1109/bc/bc1110g.gif

    Clicking here might even work...

    I'd try the "img src=" thing, but they might remove it or block it if they see direct links from the outside world...

  • 13 - Eric Olsen

    Nov 26, 2003 at 1:11 pm

    it appears to be gone - the evidence has been eaten.

  • 14 - Hazy Dave

    Nov 26, 2003 at 2:00 pm

    Okay, here it is!

  • 15 - Eric Olsen

    Nov 26, 2003 at 2:15 pm

    thanks Dave!

  • 16 - JR

    Nov 26, 2003 at 4:39 pm

    Okay, I gotta go with the cryptic attack on Islam. Good for him.

  • 17 - Douglas Mays

    Jun 26, 2004 at 8:43 pm

    Regarding MC's comment #9 it is a crack up about Hart insulting everyone's intelligence. MC, you are just making a joke of your own intelligence by taking such a 'moron snob' attitude. The joke is on you. Hart is smarter than you think. Ha-Ha...

    Moving on to Islamic insults. Talk about out-thinking the question! Sounds like a typical Islam terrorist, looking for any cheap reason to kill.

    Yeah, threaten Hart like Salman Rushdie.

    peaceloveguidance

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 27, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs