How long did it take you to put Myth America together? Clearly this was not an overnight project.
Promise not to tell the state patrol, okay? I outlined the entire book on a pad on the center armrest of a U-Haul truck while I was hauling some furniture across eastern Washington state. No radio, no company, no view. What else was I to do? It took me about a year to flesh out the first draft and another year to edit and revise it. I’d already done most of my homework in conjunction with another book I was doing, but I had lots of stops and starts to research specifics along the way. And I have a day job.
I have yet to meet an author that stops at one book. Having shredded the government, what is your next project?
Because of the world scene, I may have to expand my horizons and do a global sequel. How does The Myth UNIVERSE Pageant sound? Actually, I have already completed another book. It’s a story of, naturally, political intrigue. It extends all the current political trends I rail against in The Myth America Pageant just a few years into the future when those trends lead to (dare I say it?) a national financial catastrophe of the sort I alluded to earlier. I wrote it first, but shelved the project to work on Myth America, I actually think the novel is even more interesting because it makes it easier to visualize what is probably the inevitable endpoint for all the political mischief we are currently enduring.
Bottom line: Why should readers buy your book and not one written by an “expert”?
When I was in college I learned that an “expert” was anyone who came from at least 25 miles away and brought his own slides. Bottom line? I AM an expert - I have over 50 years experience being an Ordinary Joe, confronting all the same problems and issues as every other Ordinary Joe. And I know how to communicate with them. The only difference is that I’ve taken a lot of extra time to study the historical, philosophical, and economic fundamentals surrounding the growth and success of our nation in my attempt to understand what’s gone wrong. Along the way it’s given me tremendous insight into the motivations and methods of those who aspire to lead us. Every voter should do exactly the same thing before they cast another ballot. But if they can’t, well, just read my book and save a lot of time. It will make you laugh. It will make you cry. Most of all it will make you think.
Article comments
1 - Jack Everett
Mr. Wickes,
Without big government the USA would be another Mexico!
What is your alternative?
2 - Sarah Johnson
You said that anyone decent enough to be trusted wouldn't get involved with politics. Does this mean you think Obama, Clinton, et al aren't decent enough to be trusted? Thanks for taking the time to comment.
SJ
3 - Natalie Bennett
This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net, which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States. Nice work!
4 - Simon Barrett
I am pretty certain that Robert will want a piece of this action! I will use the cattle prod on him! There will be answers soon!
5 - Rob Wickes
Mr. Everett,
I believe that without big government the USA would be the USA"as designed! The Founding Fathers intended a limited government whose primary charge is to provide an umbrella of protection of individual rights under which we could all manage our own lives through the free enterprise, personal accountability, and the voluntary associations which we call civil society.
The U.S. Constitution very clearly and very precisely states all the powers that were to belong to Congress. Later, in the Bill of Rights it very clearly and very precisely states that any power not specified as a power of Congress is reserved either for the states of for the people. There are two loopholes: The commerce and welfare clauses. They have been used to justify virtually unlimited government expansion beyond the approximately twenty powers listed in Article I, Section 8 even though the Founding Fathers intended none of it. Madison even said something to the effect that if they’d wanted Congress to have unlimited power they wouldn’t have bothered listing their specific powers.
So, if we get rid of everything else from the federal budget outside those 20 things do we end up with Mexico? Heck NO! Mexico's government has much corruption and the rule of law has been subverted to the rule of whim.
We maintain our law and order with a limited government, and society is what happens underneath the umbrella. Our country became great not because of what the government DID, but because of what the government did not do. It mostly left us alone to take our risks and seek to discover, to innovate, to create, to explore, and to produce. And so we did.
The question you should be asking is “If we keep allowing Big Government to get BIGGER, what will happen? The answer is to look at the past century of failed experiments in big government"socialism, fascism, communism, and a whole bunch in between. There are but three political states: Liberty, tyranny, and chaos. In any society in which there is law and order, the real political spectrum, therefore, spans from individualism to totalitarianism. All human conflict springs from the imposition of will by one person or group over another. Therefore the further you wrest control of one’s own life from his own grasp the more likely you are to create conflict and the closer you venture towards tyranny in order to maintain law and order.
6 - Rob Wickes
Ms. Johnson,
We are at an interesting time in our democracy. We used to have philosophically distinctive candidates advocating either for private sector expansion with limited government control over our lives versus those who lobbied continuously for a bigger government role. Since 2000, we seem to only manage to field candidates who main differences contrast Republican Big Government solutions versus Democrat Big Government solutions.
Candidates Obaba and Clinton are certainly big government advocates. With their past actions and stated intensions to take over the US healthcare industry that actually raises their title to full-fledged socialists. Americans don’t want to here those kinds of words on their candidates or in their political conversations, but that’s what big government is all about. I delve at length in the first few chapters of the book into the various economic and sociologic philosophies and once we’re finished the reader has a pretty clear view of the flaws of each.
Candidates today are running for offices from which they will be able to wield enormous influence in a multitude of ways over my personal and business life. No way am I going to yield that trust easily. By the time most candidates are running for national offices, their lust for power easily replaces the desire to do good they may have entertained at one stage in their careers.
My rules: Challenge convention. Question everything to hear. If I’m going to get something only because someone else is going to give it up, there’s something seriously wrong.
7 - Rob Wickes
Please excuse the typos in my last post. I ought to claim that I am the victim here! The medicolegal/pharmaceutical industrial complex forced me to have shoulder surgery 2 days before and I should not be held responsible for writing under the influence of insufficient REM time and excess pain medication. If I were a big government advocate I'd point to this as a perfect example of why we ought to have universal health care, because people are obviously incapable of looking out for themselves.
Instead, I'll use the classic phraseology of such philosophical libertarian icons as John Locke and simply say,"Me Bad!"