Today on Blogcritics
Home » Books » Book Reviews » Book Review: Virtual Worlds – Rewiring Your Emotional Future by Jack Myers

Book Review: Virtual Worlds – Rewiring Your Emotional Future by Jack Myers

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

In June 2007, Mother Jones published an article by Dave Gilson entitled "Even Better Than the Real Thing." More a point-by-point listing of interesting and potentially disturbing facts related to virtual worlds than a coherent article, this piece makes one thing very clear — regardless of how you feel or what you think about virtual worlds, they have an increasingly commanding, real-world presence. The populations of these virtual worlds are experiencing exponential growth, as are their very real economies.

In Virtual Worlds: Rewiring Your Emotional Future, Jack Myers writes about virtual worlds as a passionate supporter. He is neither a dispassionate observer of the "explosive impact that the proliferation of Virtual Worlds is having on culture, society, and business today," nor, as I am, a curious but cautiously ambivalent one. In Virtual Worlds, Myers argues that "Virtual worlds and enhanced social networks allow us to explore new universes, expand our emotional range and depth, change the nature of communication and create different identities for ourselves."

Indeed, he is optimistic that virtual worlds will positively transform humanity. He compares our entrance into virtual worlds to "an amphibian taking its first tentative steps out of water and discovering how to breathe" and sees in them "the potential to radically alter the emotional code of the human race," demoting "the brain from its position of dictatorial power over our emotional well-being" and evolving the emotional DNA of new generations to "empower the heart and the gut to manage and control actions and decisions with the advice of the brain but not necessarily its consent."

Jack Myers is editor and publisher of the Jack Myers Media Business Report, and of MediaVillage.com. He has been involved in media business since the late 1970s, first as a sales executive for CBS-TV, then as a consultant and advisor for various media companies, agencies, and advertisers. Since 1999, Myers has become immersed in new media technologies with industry-wide forums on interactive television development, annual surveys on media sales organization and performance, and emotional connection studies. Myers is a board member of the Newhouse School of Communications at Syracuse University, serves on the Dean's Advisory Board for the Steinhardt School at New York University, and is a member of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences.

Having already disclosed that I am curious about the effects the proliferation and expansion of virtual worlds will have on society, but also cautious and ambivalent, I must say that Virtual Worlds was a frustrating read. The topic is very fascinating, and there is much to be studied, discussed, and debated in cultural studies and media courses at high schools, colleges, and universities around the world, as also around the dinner table. And because it is so pervasive, demands so much of young people's attention and time, and because it has the potential for a significant impact on our societies, cultures, and economies, it deserves, indeed demands, to be approached from a distance, from within, and from different angles. That is one of the frustrations of this book, namely that it is more a promotion and celebration of virtual worlds than serious study or discussion. Readers who have already decided that virtual worlds are not only fun and great, but that their impact will be wonderful and positive, will love this book.

Another frustration relates to sources and citations. The first three chapters are almost devoid of them, despite the fact that psychologists, scientists, anthropologists, and sociologists are invoked to make various claims. Myers writes that "[p]sychologists report a child's virtual self often reflects more about their core self-image than the self they display in their day-to-day behavior." He also writes that "[s]cientists, sociologists and anthropologists suggest that active social participation and involvement in online virtual worlds is a more constructive and healthy human experience than passively watching television, reading a book, or being in an unhappy job or relationship." I want to know which psychologists are reporting such things and what studies they conducted to arrive at their conclusions. Or which scientists (a very generic term), sociologists, and anthropologists made the suggestion that involvement in online virtual worlds is more constructive and healthy than the other activities referenced, and how this diverse group of experts came to their conclusions. Myers not only fails to provide any information on the studies behind these conclusions, but does not even provide us with the names of the experts involved so we can do our own follow-up reading.

About Abram Bergen

  • http://vikk.typepad.com/down_the_writers_path/ Vikk Simmons

    When I read the title I thought this would be a book that would touch on the consequences of living in virtual worlds but apparently you didn’t find it so. That’s a shame. Having worked in an environment where at least half of the staff played War Craft–including the GM–and having a 15-year old grandson taking his responsibilities to his online virtual friends more seriously than those of his real family, I continue to wonder at the long term effects of the growing virtual society and game playing. I have no doubt that there are many plusses. But I refuse to believe there the dark side is nonexistent. I still may read the book more for th sections you found interesting but it is a shame the writer chose content as he did–but understandably so.

  • http://wordwork-play.com Abram

    Thanks for your comment, Vikk. As I mentioned near the beginning of the review, the impact of virtual worlds cannot be ignored. The reason the book interested me at first was precisely because I expected it to take a serious look at the phenomenon, to study it, examine it from different angles, etc. It was, unfortunately, a book by someone whose mind is already made up, based, I think, on insufficient evidence. It is too significant a phenomenon, with the potential for a profound (for better and/or worse) impact on present and future generations, to arrive at easy, one-sided and premature conclusions. Please do read it for yourself. All perspectives need to be heard and examined.