The Kreutzer Sonata by Leo Tolstoy is a novella written in 1889. At times this novella seemed like a rant that goes on page after page, but taken as a whole I can certainly see the genius behind it.
In it main character Pozdnyshev overhears a conversation on a train about love and marriage when he is reminded of his past misdeeds. Pozdnyshev continues to talk to himself/G-d/the reader about how he fell in love, then out of love and finally murdering his own wife.
I enjoyed The Kreutzer Sonata by Leo Tolstoy very much, it was a quick read, quite interesting but also a bit disturbing. I disagree with many of the themes the book represents and it seemed as if Tolstoy wrote this novella while being in an extremely foul mood, or extremely mad at his wife.
The novella is pro-religion (Christianity), sexist, anti physical contact (sex), pro-life (or more accurately anti-birth control), and seems to justify murder. One of the characters (very few) feels justified at murdering his wife how might–might–have cheated on him. That being said, the book is very well written and can be appreciated even though one might disagree with almost all the opinions in the
I guess the major disagreement I have with Mr. Tolstoy lies in his position that sex is evil and that women are oppressed and have sex because men force them to. Men, on the other hand, are wired to have sex all the time (OK, I can’t argue with that) but will do best to avoid such temptations.
The story is poignant and, despite the themes above, presents the challenges of being married quite well. Tolstoy does well by making a point about the illusions of love and marriage, something which our high divorce rate might point to. As I mentioned, I don’t agree with many of the ideas presented in the story, but I do think that they are presented well, make some good points and are certainly a food for thought especially for those of us who hold contrary views.
Tolstoy could be anti-Aesop. While Aesop used animals instead of humans in fables, Tolstoy gives people beastly traits. I understand why Tolstoy made that choice but simply didn’t care for the forced analogies (especially since there are so many good ones which can be observed almost daily).
There are no characters in this short story I could see myself in, like, or even sympathize with. Pozdnyshev seems irrational at best and just plain nuts at worst; he seems to relish describing things in an appalling way in order to shock his audience.
Regardless, Tolstoy managed to write a powerful story in a short amount of space. That is a good thing because I don’t know if I would have been able to read a full length novel with the characteristics mentioned in previous paragraphs.
- 128 pages
- Publisher: Modern Library
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0812968239
Buy this book in paper or electronic (Kindle) format.
Powered by Sidelines