Today on Blogcritics
Home » Books » Book Reviews » Book Review: The Grim Grotto – by Lemony Snicket

Book Review: The Grim Grotto – by Lemony Snicket

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Perhaps it is fitting that Lemony Snicket will forever languish in the shadow of J.K. Rowling and her wildly successful Harry Potter novels, as Snicket’s nearly-as-successful “Series of Unfortunate Events” books are written with such a dour (a word which here means “incredibly sad and depressing”) tone that one can hardly imagine the author being particularly thrilled at being the #1 bestselling author of books for young adults. Which is a shame, because, with all due respect to Ms. Rowling, the continuing adventures of the Baudelaire orphans (inventive Violet, bookish Klaus, and baby Sunny), which Snicket so painstakingly chronicles in, so far, eleven novels, are inarguably some of the best recent books for pre-teens. Of course, older teens and adults like myself can take equal pleasure from the ever-more-imaginative plots and the clever wordplay.

The Grim Grotto picks up the pace of the series significantly and, though it is the longest book so far, moves incredibly quickly, even when read aloud (as many parents are likely to do with their younger children). Grotto picks up just where the tenth book left off, with the Baudelaires trapped in aggressive rapids on a small, crumbling toboggan. The “theme” of this book, if you can call it that, is water, primarily because nearly the entire story takes place underwater. Indeed, Snicket tries to distract less clever readers with frequent digressions into the three stages of the water cycle (precipitation, collection, and evaporation), though he does so only to lull them into a catatonic (a word which here means, “bored and tired enough that they will not keep reading of the Baudelaires’ continuing misfortunes”) state. But diligent readers who make it past these distractions are well rewarded.

As with the previous books, Grotto builds significantly on all that has come before, though Snicket does a good enough job reminding us of key plot points that readers like myself, who have missed a few of the volumes along the way, will not be entirely lost. Old villains return, of course, along with at least one old friend, but the real treat here is the introduction of several new characters, chiefly Captain Widdershins, captain of the submarine Queequeg and his mycologist daughter, Fiona. Widdershins is a boisterous fellow who can’t help but interject an explosive “Aye!” at the end of every statement he makes. He lives by his personal philosophy (“He who hesitates is lost”), which seems to be helpful only about half of the time. Fiona, a young girl about Klaus’s age, is one of the only two members of Widdershins’s crew, and proves to be a valuable ally to the Baudelaires, at first.

Snicket (who is actually writer Daniel Handler) manages to ratchet up the stakes yet again with The Grim Grotto, which finds our heroes in more than a few difficult, and often nearly deadly, predicaments. With only two more books remaining of the proposed thirteen, its hard to see how all of the loose plot strands are going to be resolved in time. The author has shown a knack for keeping a long-running story fresh and interesting, but he has yet to prove he can actually resolve all of the many events he’s so far set into motion. Whether he can or cannot is immaterial, as hordes or devoted readers will be along for the ride either way.

Powered by

About Nick Danger

  • http://selfaudit.blogspot.com Aaman

    Apart from the depressing nature of the writing, one takes exception to the childish (one might say elevenish) form. Children are not idiots, at least most of them. They are quick to pick up on a patronizing tone. There may be wordplay, but not of the swashbuckling order.

    JK Rowling does not make that mistake. Her books consistently raise the bar for kids, both thematically and verbally.

    I find the Snicket books a pain to plow through.

    Of course, once the film is out, even the worst writing in the world will not stop the Snicket juggernaut from limbering up to speed, a la Rowling.

  • Sporos

    I beg to differ, Aaman.

    Upon reading both the Rowling books and the Snicket books, I must say that Snicket succeeds in raising the bar for kids. There are multiple layers in the humor that actually cause you to think a little bit. These books tend to be more allusive than direct, using dialogue and descriptions rather than narration to tell a story. Kids can learn new things by just reading what they see, and they are learning without knowing it! Plus, the plots are more imaginative than the typical fantasy approach in the Harry Potter novels. Thrrough all of their trouble, you can see the love the Baudelaires have for each other.

    Rowling, on the other hand, seems to lay it out for you straight, thus the books tend to be repetitive. If you are looking for strict composition in a novel, the Harry Potter books are prime examples of this. The perspective stays the same (much to my irritation, since Harry seems to never get out of the pre-adolescence way of thinking), the descriptions of surroundings are consistent, stating exactly what is going on, what people are doing, etc. Quite annoying at times, but extremely addictive, which has kept me a fan for all these years and letdowns.

    Not to say that Rowlings books are awful, because they are quite good, but I don’t see how you can compare such vastly different authors and novels.