Today on Blogcritics
Home » Books » Book Reviews » Book Review: American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis

Book Review: American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis

Patrick Bateman: a twenty-six year-old Wall Street yuppie, a psychopath, and perhaps the world’s worst nightmare. That being said, he is also the anti-hero that I couldn’t help but love. Bret Easton Ellis churned out a great novel in this one. Here is why.

American Psycho is narrated by Patrick Bateman, the anti-hero, who works in Wall Street, pulling in six-figure salaries a year, and is the stereotypical corporate yuppie living in New York City. Set in the mid-1980s, the novel starts solidly by sketching Bateman’s personality: he is vain, materialistic, and is the living stereotype of a glamorous corporate spender. He wants to be the one who owns the best stereo system; he wants to be the one who has the best business card; and he gets irritated and annoyed whenever someone else seems to have better things than him.

He is also hot and sexy, and he knows it: he gives style advise to his friends, and even in the monologue narrations, he gives advice to the reader about fashion and grooming (I especially liked the shaving advice he has, with the part about the moisturizer and cologne). In addition to that, he knows his brand names: this book perhaps holds the record for name-dropping the most designer brands in the text.

So, Patrick Bateman is vain and materialistic. So what, most people in the world are like that. But no, this anti-hero is special. Patrick Bateman is also a psychopath. He is a serial killer. And in 400 pages, he manages to maim, torture, and kill dozens of people, from beggars to delivery boys to prostitutes to children. And yes, it is graphically narrated, that I squirmed on my seat as I gasped in horror at the mental representation I was creating while reading these passages. That being said, I don’t think I would be watching the movie version any time soon.

I do not intend to describe the gross and horrendous things that Patrick Bateman did. I will leave that for the reader to find out. One question, however, that I would like to ask, is whether the killings really did happen, or if it was all a product of his imagination. I believe that by leaving the answer to this question ambiguous, this book just earned itself some top-notch respect and praise.

I see two interpretations to the book, depending on whether one thinks that Patrick Bateman really killed his victims or not. If one presupposes that the killings really did happen, then Patrick Bateman is an emotionally-damaged individual, who resorts to killing just to be noticed in the sea of anonymity in the corporate world. In his world, everyone has a business card, everyone dines in the same top-notch restaurants, everyone pretty much follows the script, and killing is his way of attempting to be noticed. Heck, all throughout the novel, various peripheral characters call him by other names: they mistake him for someone else. And in one occasion, after killing someone, he goes to great lengths, almost revealing himself as the killer, just so that someone would take interest in himself and the events surrounding him.

On the other hand, if one presupposes that the killings are a fantasy that was all in his head, then I still see Patrick Bateman has an emotionally-damaged individual, who is sick of the mundane and monotonous life that he leads. He has a girlfriend who he doesn’t love, he has a secretary who loves him, and he does the same thing over and over again day in and day out. Hence, a fantasy involving killing a stranger, strangling them, electrocuting them, cutting off their breasts, doing horrendous things to them, these are just fantasies that he constructs in his head to keep himself alive. Wall Street has numbed him enough that he needs to simulate pain in his head just to be able to feel.

Regardless of what the reader might think, I admire this novel, and perhaps is one of the best novels I have read in the recent past. I like the unreliability of the narrator, allowing the reader to be involved in the story himself. Personally, I found the narrator (Bateman) so unreliable, that I formulated my own hypotheses regarding what really is the truth in this story.

About Jeruen Dery

  • Steven

    You should watch the movie. Christian Bale put on an amazing performance and it’s defitnitely not as graphic as the novel. The censors would never let the filmmakers get away with it.

    • Melissa

      totally agree. I heard they might make a remake of American Psycho b/c the author hated the film version. I found it interesting that even though there’s all this detail on the murderers that Patrick doesn’t express his actual feelings on the actual act itself. I mean yes he’s having an orgasm and enjoying himself but he doesn’t inform of how he is acting feeling during the actual act, does that make sense? I hope so.

      • guest

        he doesn’t feel

  • Jd

    The idea behind American Psycho is that the main character is delusional. Patrick Bateman represents a cartoonish version of a successful capitalist businessman. He’s ultra-violent, merciless. It’s hard to distinguish between what really happened and what didn’t, but overall he was imagining the whole thing. An anti-hero in his own mind.

  • Melissa

    I am reading the book because the actor Matt Smith is playing Patrick Bateman in the musical version of the play/film. I did enjoy the film version with Christian Bale but I have to admit the book is way better and I can understand why they didn’t put most of what was in the book into the film because the film itself would have been NC-17 due to the sex and graphic violence which I got to say being a horror lover I found a bit too much. At first with the nail gun scene that was sort of “okay” but when it goes the hookers [stabbing, electrocution, skinning and screwing the whore head and power drill] that was a bit much but I mean he is a serial killer so the killing aren’t going to be pretty right? Not that I am saying I agree with the violence in the book but if it wasn’t extreme you wouldn’t read it, right? I mean he’s a psychopath so his killing has to be “creative” instead of the same-old-same old stuff we’ve seen before in the news which I have to admit is a lot more scary then a character in a book or film. I will admit the killing of the kid was a bit too much I mean that’s just mean, what does Patrick have against kids? And I have to agree that it was all in his head because there is no way anyone could get away with all those murderers and not get caught or at least be questioned and not for Paul Owen’s death. I know it was the 80s and I totally get it that people didn’t really care and people in NYC [not offense to folks in New York] don’t really pay too much attention to what’s going on around them so they wouldn’t even notice someone being killing in the middle of Time Square, let alone someone’s apartment. And I also feel that it was all a fantasy because doesn’t Patrick have a maid? I mean wouldn’t she have to clean up the mess he made? Lord know he ain’t gonna do it. I will say this about the author that dude needs serious help. Bret Easton Ellis dude you need Jesus lol But last thing because I put this review to rest, I thought the book was very entertaining when it actually started developing a story because no offense but they could have take ALOT of that material out of it. I mean do we really need a 2 page discussion on bottle water? And I understand Patrick is a successful businessman and loves his suits and everything but do we really need to know every little detail on what everyone is wearing in the scene? I understand Bret is setting a scene but Lord take it down a notch.