Home / Culture and Society / Bill Clinton Raises the Roof at the Democratic Convention

Bill Clinton Raises the Roof at the Democratic Convention

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Bill Clinton has never been better than he was Wednesday evening at the Democratic convention, which climaxed with the nomination of President Obama as the nominee for the November elections. Clinton has a rare gift of explaining complex matters to ordinary people, and that’s exactly what he did. He’s a personable chap and has a tendency to convince the listeners that they should listen closely. “Sit down,” he tossed off, and we heard a sequence of similar constraints. At “Sit!” television and Internet viewers saw Michelle Obama, first lady lead the crowd in heeding his admonition. As to that, Clinton received rapturous applause when he praised the president for having the good sense to marry Michelle. Mrs. Obama on Tuesday wowed the crowd with stories of her life with Barack.

Former President Bill Clinton went on about arithmetic, job creation, and a wealth of other matters, clarifying the previously muddy waters. He concluded to standing cheers with a judgment that at this point we all must agree that indeed, we are better off than we were four years ago.

An interesting development of that evening of speeches and nominations stemmed from the fact that within the last few days the Democratic platform had been altered from the 2008 wording in two subtle but important ways. In the amended platform, gone was the strong wording that the American Democrats view Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. The president’s stated position has always been that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. The platform would have been amended to read, “The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.”

The other modification had to do with references to God. “We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values, and interests of working people and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential” was altered to eliminate the reference to “God.” Obama registered surprise when he was advised of the platform change. There may be a time when the majority opts for a clear distinction between government and religion, but in view of the strongly religious deportment of the framers of our nation and our Constitution, that time has not come. In any case, the platform changes were reversed and the earlier wording retained.

Convention chairman Antonia Villaraigosa was adamant that the president was firmly behind the 2008 wording and not supportive of the changes. There was an awkward point when Villaraigosa called for a verbal vote from the delegates present regarding reversion to the original wording; he was intolerant of the changes and sought to immediately undo them. He said that a two-thirds majority was needed. From the viewpoint of those viewing worldwide, there was doubt that even a 50/50 majority was achieved. Villaraigosa repeated the request for the vocal vote three times and finally asserted that the two-thirds majority had been achieved. Watchers must consider acoustics and placement of microphones before reaching any conclusions, but speculation is that we will hear more on this issue in the coming days and weeks.

Well versed in such issues is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who is currently working with global leaders in the far East. Reports mention that secretary Clinton watched a recorded version of her husband’s speech shortly after it aired.

Clint Eastwood and his amusing chair sequence at the Republican convention notwithstanding, it appeared that the Democrats had considerably more to say than the conservatives, and the convention as a whole held our attention. In addition we were spared from listening to repetitive personal attacks. The Republicans seem unaware of the current influx of voters far better versed than in previous years, sophisticated voters indeed, living in an age of Internet conversation, and a lively “blogosphere.”

It should be interesting to see the president speak tonight as he accepts the nomination.

Photo: CBS News

Powered by

About John Lake

John Lake had a long and successful career in legitimate and musical theater. He moved up into work behind the camera at top motion pictures. He has done a smattering of radio, and television John joined the Blogcritics field of writers owing to a passion for the liberal press, himself speaking out about the political front, and liberal issues. Now the retired Mr. Lake has entered the field of motion picture, television, and video game (now a daily gamer!) critique. His writing is always innovative and immensely readable!
  • Did anyone notice the absense of either Presidents Bush at the GOP conventions? I guess they thought that the American People are all very short-memoried. What convention doesn’t feature their latest president?

    You missed the highlight of Clinton’s speech…
    PRESIDENT CLINTON: “…in Tampa – did y’all watch their convention?

    I did. (Laughter.) In Tampa, the Republican argument against the president’s re-election was actually pretty simple – pretty snappy. It went something like this: We left him a total mess. He hasn’t cleaned it up fast enough. So fire him and put us back in. (Laughter, applause.)

  • John Lake

    Hi Jet, Hope you are feeling better. Yes, the Democrats had a great convention!

  • Igor

    The dems convention was sensational, and the reps were dowdy and boring.

    I think the persona was set by the women who spoke: Ann Romney was a plastic dud, and Michelle Obama and Jill Biden were terrific.

    Presidential candidates should be careful to marry well.

  • I was very satisfied with how he caled Ryan on the carpet…

    “…Both Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan attacked the President for allegedly robbing Medicare of 716 billion dollars. Here’s what really happened. There were no cuts to benefits. None. What the President did was save money by cutting unwarranted subsidies to providers and insurance companies that weren’t making people any healthier. He used the saving to close the donut hole in the Medicare drug program, and to add eight years to the life of the Medicare Trust Fund. It’s now solvent until 2024. So President Obama and the Democrats didn’t weaken Medicare, they strengthened it.
    When Congressman Ryan looked into the TV camera and attacked President Obama’s “biggest coldest power play” in raiding Medicare, I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. You see, that 716 billion dollars is exactly the same amount of Medicare savings Congressman Ryan had in his own budget… You gotta give the guy one thing it takes a lot of brass to attack a guy for what you did!”