<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:39:26 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Announcement: Short-content feeds</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<author>Phillip Winn</author><description>Sunday, August 26, 2007, marks the switch of all Blogcritics.org article feeds from full-content to short-content. This is the result of several converging factors, and is unfortunately a permanent decision (as permanent as any decision can be on the web, that is). We are aware of all of the reasons that this is a Bad Idea, and we are aware that some of you will be quite upset about having to click on something to read the free content, and we&#039;re sorry. Unfortunately, despite great effort, full-content feeds are not currently economically viable.

Two other factors are involved: full-content feeds have resulted in an unprecedented level of content theft, with BC content appearing on many websites, usually spam sites, without attribution or permission. This duplicate content causes a cascading set of problems, not the least of which is that search engines generally aren&#039;t favorable to duplicate content, and don&#039;t always guess correctly. Finally, our RSS advertising partner is strongly in favor of short-content feeds.

We hope that you&#039;ll continue to subscribe to BC via RSS, and when an article grabs your eye, it&#039;s only a click away, still free on the BC website. Thank you for your understanding.</description>
<category>Administration</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Rise and Fall of the NFL</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/02/07/223926.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>The Roman Empire, viewed firsthand, seemed unbeatable. Likewise, throughout history, those living in the time of great change and riches rarely believe there&#039;s ever an end to something glorious. Yet, in very instance we are able to see the decline and eventual failure of great societies, institutions, and peoples.The NFL is successful beyond its wildest imagination. Television, radio, and Internet coverage is vast and the money flowing in is astounding. People tune in at record rates and pay exorbitant prices for tickets and the ability to watch a network devoted to the league. Can it get any better?The answer is yes. Eventually we&#039;ll have coverage of each team available to us 365 days a year. For those of us who love the game, it&#039;s a dream; football all the time. If it sounds far-fetched, think again. In the last 20 years, the changes were mind-blowing. In the next 20, we&#039;ll see football worldwide. Thus, it&#039;s reasonable to conclude we are witnessing the peak of the NFL. Why? As more teams are added the league will become average. Right now, with 32 teams the position of quarterback is fragile. Go back to the 28 team league of a decade ago. Despite having four fewer teams there were was still a dearth of talent. Now, with 32, we see a dozen teams with quarterbacks that couldn&#039;t hack it in an 18 team league.Big isn&#039;t always better. Is it any wonder that we think back to the great quarterbacks of the past and wonder where they&#039;ve all gone? The answer is simple; we still have great quarterbacks, but the talent is spread thin. The same goes for every position on the field and, as we see clearly each year, on the sidelines.The diluted talent pool is a major problem. Add it to the ever present desire to cut costs while generating more revenue, and NFL fans are looking at what might be the tipping point at which the decline of the NFL begins. Within a decade we may see 34 teams and then 36 -- and that means more teams competing for money and draining a talent pool already shallow.&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">59340@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:39:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nice Guy Finished First - Who Cares?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/02/06/184539.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>The fixation on nice guys is well past the point of annoyance. As sports fans, the message is clear; nice guys can finish first. The hidden message and reality is nice guys finish first once in a while. Don&#039;t expect a change in philosophy for coaches of any sport because Tony Dungy won a Super Bowl.While there&#039;s no denying the positive effect of Dungy&#039;s accomplishments, let&#039;s not forget he&#039;s yet to make it to an elite level of two or more Super Bowl victories. Knoll, Landry, Johnson, Shula, Walsh, Flores, Belichick, Lombardi, and Parcells all won multiple Super Bowls and none were what you&#039;d call nice guys; in person perhaps, but not within the scheme of winning.To be fair, Dungy is able to coach the way he does because of Bill Polian. Polian makes tough decisions as the GM/Wonderman. Let&#039;s also keep in mind the presence of Peyton Manning who, though a friendly person, is as competitive as anyone else. The Colts possess some tough, mean players.In a sport so violent the nice guy stands out. It&#039;s the same in warfare. Eisenhower was a genuinely friendly person but for leading his divisions and armies into war he chose aggressive, tough, and often brutal men because war is brutal. Ike never stood at the front of a division and led them into war. He was a manager and a damned good one. His ability to juggle personalities set him apart.Dungy is set to become a great coach, perhaps one of the best of all time. He&#039;s doing it his way and for many it&#039;s refreshing. It&#039;s a mistake to conclude, however, he&#039;ll start a trend. While he and Bears coach Lovie Smith are both quiet it doesn&#039;t mean others will follow suit. Aggressive men are drawn to football and the bulk of coaches will be made up of these men, most of who don&#039;t care if players&#039; feelings are hurt. In short, Dungy is the exception and not the rule.&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">59277@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:45:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Super Bowl Was Decided Weeks Ago</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/02/05/191648.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>The supremely confident Chicago Bears are no more. Relegated to trivia status as the team Peyton Manning beat, the Monsters of the Midway set themselves up to fail. Whether by virtue of poor leadership on the field, as in Rex Grossman, or comments off the field, the Bears weren&#039;t in the game despite the two point differential at the half.The outcome to savvy students of the game was apparent when the conference championship games were decided. Manning, despite being the golden boy and a lighting rod for his advertisements, is unquestionably the leader of his team. The Bears may or may not look to Brian Urlacher -- and if not Brian, no one else stepped up.Leaders don&#039;t look at great teams of the past and say, with all certainty, that it&#039;s &quot;our&quot; time. Instead they compliment those who came before and set out to talk on the field through play, assuring their own legacy in a legitimate manner. Some of the Bears obviously got sick of the comparisons to the 1985 Super Bowl Champions. Tough. They played together and won a ring.The Colts, despite their Baltimore roots, didn&#039;t have the same situation. However, if they were dealing with a previous winner, you can bet it would be handled with class and dignity. The Steelers, Packers, Patriots, Cowboys, and Raiders understand the need to accept past glory and build on it. Chicago didn&#039;t and thus, instead of having two titles to celebrate, they are now .500 in Super Bowls. Elite status in the Super Bowl era is out of reach for the foreseeable future.Experts will harp on Grossman and poor offensive play; there&#039;s room for that to be sure. Rex played as bad as expected, the offense was at best inept and to be fair the defense looked soft. Having said that, it&#039;s my contention the Bears lost this game due to an inability to focus on winning, poor on-field leadership, and a lack of respect, despite the lip service, to the former Bears on whose shoulders this current group stands.&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">59239@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:16:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Saban Will Ruin Alabama Football</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/02/02/230512.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>Nick Saban&#039;s father might have been a decent coach and a good man, but from the actions of his son, the elder Saban did little to instill inner discipline in his son. Consistently flirting with every open coaching vacancy, telling lies reminiscent of the Iraqi Spokesman, and using slurs with the explanation he was merely passing along a story and that it was off the record shows the duplicity and stupidity of Mr. Saban.Now in his role at Alabama, he is able to instill the positive message of lying and ethnic bashing to high school recruits. There will be no shortage of shortsighted parents who fall for the suave propaganda minister sporting the Alabama logo. He will ingratiate himself long enough to find another job. It&#039;s not a stretch to call him Napoleon minus the strategic genius of the French Emperor. They have much in common, though Napoleon&#039;s integrity was stronger.After his latest incident, one wonders if the University of Alabama cares who represents them. The answer is a firm and resounding no. Academics? They don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; academics at Alabama. Wins, SEC championships, and a national title; the university laid out their plan for success. The student athletes on the football team are not students under Saban. Like a mafia boss, Saban will reward the earners, those who perform on the field for they are the keys to his success.A failure in the professional game, Saban understands his future is about winning big at Alabama for a future payday. Always the fair-haired lad, Saban will now contend with a hostile media, fans that see him as a liar and moral vacuum, and coaches who will use all of it to recruit against him. Despite that, Saban will win because the college game is much simpler than the NFL. Sadly, the parents of his players, blind in their allegiance to the Alabama myth, will sacrifice their sons for Saban&#039;s glory. &lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">59094@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 23:05:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fire Sean Salisbury</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/02/01/124137.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>Socrates is a model for many who yearn to instruct the youth of today. One of the more appealing characteristics of the great man was his willingness to admit he was in error. In our post-modern society, where doublespeak and BS rule, few are willing to admit an error. Instead of &quot;I made an error,&quot; we hear a convoluted statement amounting to nothing but a waste of time. Therefore, instead of taking the easy route, The Critic decided to step up and admit his wrongness about Sean Salisbury.Previously I wrote it was up to debate whether Salisbury&#039;s slip of the tongue was indicative of some inner anti-Semitism. However, after listening to a cleaned up version and a copy of his radio show I&#039;m more convinced that Sean is a dirt bag.The question of ESPN retaining him is ridiculous. He deserves dismissal and anything short of it is absurd. His alleged foray about sending female co-workers pictures of his penis over his camera phone, over-the-top pronouncements, and slip of the tongue at that precise moment serve to further embarrass ESPN at a time when more and more sports fans are becoming hostile to the company.It also begs the question: What did Harold Reynolds do to deserve being fired, and was the same standard applied to Salisbury? It&#039;s difficult to believe that some preferential treatment wasn&#039;t given to Salisbury, either because of his race or friendship with ESPN execs. Or, like Matt Millen, perhaps he&#039;s rewarded for his massive shortcomings.Let me put it bluntly; fire Sean Salisbury.&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">59036@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:41:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Reggie Bush Saga</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/01/26/113226.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>The bestowing of honors is at best a tricky proposition. From the early Romans to the Downtown Athletic Club, the same issue creeps in; can the recipient represent the award and those who have their names linked with it. Reggie Bush reignited the debate after reports surfaced of tapes implicating Bush in a gifts scandal. The rule is simple by NCAA standards. No player can accept gifts while a student athlete. Yet, it seems the simple rules are most often violated. The Heisman Trophy goes to the most popular player among the voters rather than the best player in all of college football. Traditionally those winning the Heisman have not fared well at the next level but winning it assures a player and his school of tremendous marketing opportunities. USC coveted the award for Bush as much as Bush sought to receive it.Bush is a good professional football player. It is likely, barring injury, he will be great prior to his retirement, but his actions could cost USC. Theoretically, the university can be stripped of its National Titles but that is not going to occur. As the only college on the West Coast with a monster reputation USC is the fair-haired lad among NCAA brass.What about Bush? Little can be done to affect him now except exposing his deceitfulness since he has denied the gifts allegations since the first report surface some time ago. Dullards contend Bush doesn&#039;t care because he&#039;s getting paid. The problem is how advertisers look at someone caught out as a cheater and liar. The mood is souring over athletes being given preferential treatment and everyday another writer or public figure takes a swipe at professional sports. Advertisers do not like negative images.Finally, and most importantly, we are left with Reggie Bush. As an athlete and performer, he is gifted physically. As a man, or role model for a young boy aspiring to athletic greatness, Bush is on the bubble. Receiving the Heisman was great but at what cost.
&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">58765@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:32:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bengals Yearn For Discipline</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/01/25/121733.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>Queen Elizabeth, the Virgin Queen, stymied by a war between the Protestants and Catholics, needed a person to step in to restore some measure of order and discipline. Afterwards a powerful Queen, she felt no one capable of carrying out her wishes with respect to the removal of those opposed to the crown. Enter Francis Walsingham. A master at the cunning art of deception, he attacked the undisciplined court vigorously.Upon reading the news of yet another Cincinnati Bengal being arrested, further embarrassing the organization, it became clear Marvin Lewis needs help. He is not capable, or willing, to step up and do the dirty work. Whether he does or not will determine his future because other players are speaking out.Perhaps Lewis could use a Walsingham type figure, minus the torture and murder. A coach or front office person willing to say we will take a cap hit and suffer just to show we are part of the civilized world. Granted, we are talking football here and marijuana charges are minor. However, in the eyes of the fans, the Bengals practices must begin with firing drills.If the Bengals were coming off a 12-4 season, Marvin could say -- smile firmly hidden -- &quot;We&#039;ll take care of it.&quot; Sadly for the coach, 8-8 with Carson Palmer enrages those who look at the roster and wonder how so much talent could go .500. Enter discipline.Too often, the image of a disciplinarian is Tom Coughlin. He does not fit the mold because discipline in football is telling the players to show up on time and not having to berate them or fine them. Discipline is respect because a player does not wait for you to threaten to cut him or fine him; he knows it is a done deal. The Bengals lack respect for their head coach, or else they would attempt to represent him in public. Step up, Marvin, or say goodbye to your reputation.&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">58716@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:17:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>I&#039;ll Trade Randy Moss For A List</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/01/23/180959.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>The ubiquitous list makes an appearance this time of year. In fact, to be frank, lists are everpresent but something about late January brings out the list masters. Best Super Bowl teams, games, and coaches. The NBA, MLB, and NHL are no different and its possible soccer has a list of the five most frightening shin ouches in history. In an effort to keep up with people paid to write lists The Critic will offer &quot;The Set of Fives,&quot; a bi-weekly look at some notable and not so notable lists compiled while attempting to understand the popularity of Grey&#039;s Anatomy.Five Overrated Running Backs:1.	Emmitt Smith 
2.	Brian Westbrook
3.	Frank Gifford
4.	Jerome Bettis
5.	Tiki BarberFive NBA Players I&#039;d Sign in Order:1.	Steve Nash
2.	Kobe Bryant
3.	Dirk Nowitzki
4.	Carmelo Anthony
5.	LeBron JamesFive Greatest MLB Hitters:1.	Ty Cobb
2.	Joe Jackson
3.	Barry Bonds
4.	Babe Ruth
5.	Willie MaysFive Best NFL Coaches Since 1970:1.	Chuck Knoll
2.	Bill Walsh
3.	Bill Parcells
4.	Joe Gibbs
5.	Bill BelichickFive Overrated NFL Coaches (Current):1.	Jon Gruden
2.	Marvin Lewis
3.	Brian Billick
4.	Herm Edwards
5.	Tom CoughlinFive NFL Teams to Eliminate:1.	New York Jets
2.	Detroit Lions
3.	Carolina Panthers
4.	San Diego Chargers
5.	New Orleans SaintsFive MLB Teams to Eliminate: 1.	Tampa Bay Devil Rays
2.	Florida Marlins
3.	Toronto Blue Jays
4.	Kansas City Royals
5.	Seattle Mariners&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">58613@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:09:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jim Mora Lands With Seahawks - Watch Out Ty</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/01/22/110909.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>Jim Mora, Jr., fired as the head coach of the Atlanta Falcons, recently signed a contract to coach the secondary with the Seattle Seahawks. Mike Holmgren welcomes him to the staff because former head coaches usually make great assistants. Viewing it in that context, the move is not at all strange.However, looking back at Mora&#039;s comments about his desire to coach at the University of Washington, his alma mater, landing with the nearby Seahawks raises a few eyebrows, none more so than Tyrone Willingham, the current coach at U-Dub.In the latter half of the 2006 NFL season, Mora commented on radio about his desire to return to the Huskies as head coach. Later stating he was joking, Mora created a media firestorm in Atlanta and the Falcons&#039; 45 fans were irate. It seemed like a classless move by Mora but viewed side by side with Nick Saban and Bobby Petrino its minor.If Mora accepted a position with another team this would largely be forgotten. Working for the Seahawks and talking to the same media covering the Huskies, it is anything but forgotten. The issue and will draw questions every time Willingham loses a game. Based on his performance as a coach, the Huskies are likely to lose four or five times. An unwritten rule in coaching is to avoid sabotaging another coach during his tenure. Mora appears to have forgotten this, or he just doesn&#039;t care. In his comments after being named to Seahawks staff, Mora pointed out he was thrilled to have his family back in the northwest. The old family shield trick often works but in this case, it is a bit much. Jim Mora, like Nick Saban, may well find himself as the head coach of a college football program. Yet, if it occurs, he&#039;ll carry the burden of knowing he helped to put pressure on a coach. In the end though, it&#039;s Willingham&#039;s responsibility to win games. If he doesn&#039;t, Mora is standing there, a few miles away, waiting to step into the position.&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">58541@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:09:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Detroit Suffers With The Burden Of Matt Millen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/01/21/164352.php</link>
<author>The Critic</author><description>History is replete with leaders who failed their people. From Pol Pot to Hitler, Napoleon, and Arafat, each presumed to know what was best for their people -- only to fail miserably. In the same way, if not the same consequences, Matt Millen makes a mockery of the Detroit Lions. If by some miracle, the Lions were a great nation, the people would revolt and exile Millen to Canada.The 30 years I have spent watching football and the many hours spent reading about its history, there has never been a general manager so inept as to draw comparisons to butchers like Pol Pot. Yet, in a football sense, Millen is worse. He has not murdered people, but his leadership alone is worthy of the title The Detroit Butcher.A record of 23-73 is preposterous. Imagine an owner of a professional franchise extending the contract of a man who has presided over a team that has won 24% of its games. In fact, the people of Detroit don&#039;t have to imagine it -- they live it. Matt Millen, dope extraordinaire, received an extension in 2005 for five more years. And people say the Germans were crazy?The owner of the Lions, William Clay Ford, is responsible. He doesn&#039;t care a whit about winning or putting a quality product on the field. If his automobile production dipped as drastically as the Lions production, he would have fired managers left and right. Yet, for reasons unknown, he believes in Millen.Some people posit Millen has pictures of Ford doing something naughty, perhaps involving a poodle. It is nonsense. There are no conspiracies or dirty pictures. No. Lions fans see an example of stubbornness. Millen, with any pride, would resign. If Ford cared about Detroit, he&#039;d fire Matt. Neither is apparently willing to budge on their decisions to stick it out.Sadly for the Lions, there&#039;s no allied army to come and forcibly remove two incompetent boobs.&lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;The Critic dissects the sports world. He practices the ancient art of BS detection and is a nationally certified curmudgeon. He edits the &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.criticalsportsblog.com&quot;&gt;Critical Sports Blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Sports</category><guid isPermaLink="false">58498@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:43:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>