<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Author: Swillfilter</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:08:57 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Announcement: Short-content feeds</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<author>Phillip Winn</author><description>Sunday, August 26, 2007, marks the switch of all Blogcritics.org article feeds from full-content to short-content. This is the result of several converging factors, and is unfortunately a permanent decision (as permanent as any decision can be on the web, that is). We are aware of all of the reasons that this is a Bad Idea, and we are aware that some of you will be quite upset about having to click on something to read the free content, and we&#039;re sorry. Unfortunately, despite great effort, full-content feeds are not currently economically viable.

Two other factors are involved: full-content feeds have resulted in an unprecedented level of content theft, with BC content appearing on many websites, usually spam sites, without attribution or permission. This duplicate content causes a cascading set of problems, not the least of which is that search engines generally aren&#039;t favorable to duplicate content, and don&#039;t always guess correctly. Finally, our RSS advertising partner is strongly in favor of short-content feeds.

We hope that you&#039;ll continue to subscribe to BC via RSS, and when an article grabs your eye, it&#039;s only a click away, still free on the BC website. Thank you for your understanding.</description>
<category>Administration</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From Nerd to Vegas VIP in &lt;i&gt;Bringing Down the House&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/02/21/170857.php</link>
<author>Swillfilter</author><description>Casinos must love this book. We follow MIT student Kevin Lewis as he gets sucked into a school blackjack card counting club with some friends, studies intensely, and comes out millions of dollars ahead. Hell, the story seemed so quick and inevitable, I felt like I could go to Vegas and get rich. And I have a solid record of hating gambling (because of cheapness, not morality). As the Bringing Down the House itself warns, blackjack is beatable, but the casinos make much of their money off people who read one book and think they know how to beat it.These nerd to VIP fantasies form the book&#039;s main appeal. Kevin Smith starts off with a nice, common Ivy League pedigree: MIT electrical-engineering math geek who graduated from Exeter and doesn&#039;t know how to tell his dad that he won&#039;t go to med school. Within a couple of years, he&#039;s dating a Rams cheerleader, using eight fake names and partying with professional basketball players. In one scene, &quot;Kevin lay on his back laughing, scooping huge handfuls of hundred-dollar bills and tossing them into the air. He closed his eyes, his head swirling, as he bathed in a cool green rain of Benjamins.&quot; Mezrich writes at a Law and Order pace and hams up the rock star-type fantasies to make the book thoroughly entertaining. But Lewis is just a case study; the real focus is on Las Vegas. If the book has a thesis, it&#039;s that you can&#039;t steal from Vegas without being shaped by the city&#039;s mentality. As Lewis gets more and more money, he begins to act like it. His attempt to lead a double life -- one in Vegas, one in Boston -- falls apart as his previous world just isn&#039;t exciting enough. His nice Boston girlfriend doesn&#039;t fit the Vegas mold, so he dumps her for a cheerleader; his parents would never understand, so they are simply lied to. The book tries to explain where the Vegas mentality came from, but the passage is too short to do the history any justice.The main weakness to Bringing Down the House is this lack of context: we don&#039;t really know how things got to be this way in Vegas, or why the mentality is expanding: Lewis plays in just-opened casinos across the country. Mezric&#039;s digressions from the breathless plot are few and far between. But no matter. Spy stories don&#039;t need histories. The book, with its fake IDs, double lives, suspicious casino employees and loads of money, is a spy story for nerds. The thrill of such a story is taking the view of character who enters a world you aren&#039;t supposed to see. Kevin Lewis&#039; world is illuminating if you have ever thought of beating Vegas -- and still exciting if you think it&#039;s a waste of time. -- JOSH KELLER</description>
<category>Books</category><guid isPermaLink="false">13020@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:08:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>