<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Author: Keith Demko</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 7 Mar 2006 04:42:34 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Announcement: Short-content feeds</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<author>Phillip Winn</author><description>Sunday, August 26, 2007, marks the switch of all Blogcritics.org article feeds from full-content to short-content. This is the result of several converging factors, and is unfortunately a permanent decision (as permanent as any decision can be on the web, that is). We are aware of all of the reasons that this is a Bad Idea, and we are aware that some of you will be quite upset about having to click on something to read the free content, and we&#039;re sorry. Unfortunately, despite great effort, full-content feeds are not currently economically viable.

Two other factors are involved: full-content feeds have resulted in an unprecedented level of content theft, with BC content appearing on many websites, usually spam sites, without attribution or permission. This duplicate content causes a cascading set of problems, not the least of which is that search engines generally aren&#039;t favorable to duplicate content, and don&#039;t always guess correctly. Finally, our RSS advertising partner is strongly in favor of short-content feeds.

We hope that you&#039;ll continue to subscribe to BC via RSS, and when an article grabs your eye, it&#039;s only a click away, still free on the BC website. Thank you for your understanding.</description>
<category>Administration</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Movie Review: &lt;i&gt;16 Blocks&lt;/i&gt;  - A Long, Tedious Journey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/07/044234.php</link>
<author>Keith Demko</author><description>Aging Hollywood starlets must just hate Bruce Willis. As he gets older and more bloated, writers just incorporate it into his parts, trying to find some kind of nobility in playing the same alcoholic, way-over-the-hill cop time after time.His part in 16 Blocks is much the same as his part in the vastly superior Sin City. Except for this time, we&#039;re supposed to believe he finds redemption in the form of Mos Def, acting way beyond the meager bites he&#039;s given here.This movie left so little of an impression on me that it&#039;s almost hard to write about it, but I will trudge on.It&#039;s at its best when there&#039;s just Bruce and Mos, brought together because Bruce&#039;s cop has to get Mos to the courthouse over the titular 16 blocks to testify against some crooked cops who, not terribly surprisingly, don&#039;t want him to get there. You can see where this is going, but it doesn&#039;t even come close. It just meanders through a series of routine action sequences under a hail of bullets and even deadlier cliches.There are elements of two much better Pacino cop dramas at work here. When our duo are on the run, they manage to hijack and crash a city bus, giving this movie what little tension it musters in the vein of Dog Day Afternoon. As our supposed hero Bruce takes on his fellow cops, there&#039;s also a very dim shade of &quot;Serpico.&quot;But after borrowing (a nicer way to say stealing) these two motifs, director Richard Donner adds nothing else to 16 Blocks.Mos and Bruce fight hard to get through this unscarred, and they mostly succeed. Mos is a first-rate actor who will, I&#039;m certain, get to play the lead in a good movie very soon. But here he sinks under the weight of tedious dialogue that almost drowns him.It&#039;s hard to pick out the worst example, but I&#039;ll try. When Mos returns to the bus to help out his embattled buddy, he says something about how Chuck Berry and Barry White committed crimes early in their lives, but they changed, so why can&#039;t he? Well, I don&#039;t know about Barry White, but I have it on pretty good authority that Chuck Berry is just of much of an asshole now as he&#039;s ever been.How do I know? Because Chuck Leavell, keyboardist for the Rolling Stones among many other accomplishments, wrote an entire memoir in which he pretty much had kind words to say about every person he ever met. Every single person in the world of rock was just as kind as could be, except Chuck Berry, who even Leavell had to concede is a royal jerk.Why bring this up? Because, if a movie is going to try to teach us lessons, it should at least have some clue about what it&#039;s talking about.But, I&#039;ve wasted enough energy on this truly mediocre flick. Spend your money at Dave Chappelle&#039;s big party, or just keep it for yourself. &lt;div id=&quot;authorbio&quot;&gt;When I was very young, my father brought home a little movie called &quot;Spinal Tap,&quot; and I have never been the same since. Along with being a movie junkie and a devoted fan of the hapless Baltimore Orioles, I design the Life &amp; Style pages for the Telegraph in Macon, Georgia. 

&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<category>Video</category><guid isPermaLink="false">44576@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Mar 2006 04:42:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>