<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Author: Amy Araya</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:42:39 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Announcement: Short-content feeds</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<author>Phillip Winn</author><description>Sunday, August 26, 2007, marks the switch of all Blogcritics.org article feeds from full-content to short-content. This is the result of several converging factors, and is unfortunately a permanent decision (as permanent as any decision can be on the web, that is). We are aware of all of the reasons that this is a Bad Idea, and we are aware that some of you will be quite upset about having to click on something to read the free content, and we&#039;re sorry. Unfortunately, despite great effort, full-content feeds are not currently economically viable.

Two other factors are involved: full-content feeds have resulted in an unprecedented level of content theft, with BC content appearing on many websites, usually spam sites, without attribution or permission. This duplicate content causes a cascading set of problems, not the least of which is that search engines generally aren&#039;t favorable to duplicate content, and don&#039;t always guess correctly. Finally, our RSS advertising partner is strongly in favor of short-content feeds.

We hope that you&#039;ll continue to subscribe to BC via RSS, and when an article grabs your eye, it&#039;s only a click away, still free on the BC website. Thank you for your understanding.</description>
<category>Administration</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Movie Review: &lt;i&gt;Little Children&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/01/25/074239.php</link>
<author>Amy Araya</author><description>Todd Field&amp;#39;s Little Children&amp;#39;s screenplay was written in collaboration with Tom Perrotta, on whose eponymous novel it&amp;#39;s based. Perrotta wrote the funny, ironic screenplays for Election, Bad Haircut, and Joe College before this. But though mildly satirical at times in its vision of middle-class white infidelity, this second film (at last) from the director of 2000&amp;#39;s powerful In the Bedroom, with its themes out of Cheever or Updike, also moves toward the solemn and the shocking.One big reason for that is a second plot about a just-released sex offender and a troubled ex-cop who turns into a self-appointed protector of public morality campaigning to drive the ex-prisoner out of town.Brad (Patrick Wilson) is a househusband caring for his little boy while feebly preparing for his previously failed bar exams. He has a gorgeous but emasculating wife, Kathy (Jennifer Connelly), who&amp;#39;s a successful PBS-style documentary filmmaker. Sarah (Kate Winslet), with an MA in English, in charge of a recalcitrant little girl with whom she has little patience at times, has a well-off distant husband (Gregg Edelman) who&amp;#39;s a pretentious adman who gets off on Web porn. Sarah and Brad meet in a park where moms take their kids, in East Wyndham, Massachusetts. They wind up kissing when they first meet, mainly to shock the other moms.Brad and Sarah spend a lot of the summer minding their kids together at the municipal pool. This turns into a torrid affair with frequent sex at Sarah&amp;#39;s husband&amp;#39;s large house. They&amp;#39;re attractive, and attracted, and their general dissatisfaction with their spouses and with where they are now heightens their need to throw themselves at each other with the utmost abandon.Meanwhile Ronnie (former child actor Jackie Earle Haley, vividly remembered from Bad News Bears and Breaking Away and strong in a new way here) has come into town: he&amp;#39;s the sex offender, a painfully self-aware one, and he lives with the one person who loves him, his aging mother Ruth (a convincing Phyllis Somerville), while the ex-cop, Larry (Noah Emmerich) wages his war as a one-man &amp;quot;committee.&amp;quot; Larry and Brad have met and Larry persuades Brad, who already wastes time watching boys skateboarding when he&amp;#39;s supposed to be boning up for the bar exam, to join a night touch football league team made up of cops &amp;ndash; and thus the infidelity and the sex offender elements are linked. But they would be anyway, because this is a small community. And one particularly hot day Ronnie comes to the municipal swimming pool and causes an outcry when he&amp;#39;s spotted ogling young girls under water.The other moms from the park, who were afraid of Brad and called him &amp;quot;the Prom King,&amp;quot; are gently satirized by a voice-over narration spoken by Will Lyman, of Frontline on PBS, which sounds like a high school educational film. Perrotta is, after all, a comic writer. But more of that later.The movie has a bright, intense, clear visual style, sometimes making use of extreme close-ups. Since the acting and directing are fine, this gives things a feeling of authority. It&amp;#39;s also effective in underlining both the satirical and the sensual aspects of the story, and heightens the emotional effect when the narrative lines move toward crisis.Brad&amp;#39;s development (the novel-based voice-over tells us) may have been arrested by his mother&amp;#39;s dying when he was in his early teens, and this explains why he watches the skateboarding boys with such longing: they&amp;#39;re having the playtime that was stolen from him.Another theme is that of Cheryl (Marsha Dietlein), Sarah&amp;#39;s friend and neighbor who babysits her daughter when she&amp;#39;s having sex with Brad, speed-walks with her, and gets her into a book discussion group leading to a pointed scene in which Madame Bovary is discussed and Sarah defends the adulterous heroine as someone who revolted in search of freedom. The older women nod approvingly, while one of the park moms doesn&amp;#39;t get it at all.Partly because it&amp;#39;s hard to juggle all these elements from a 350-page novel, the ironic narrative voice disappears throughout the film&amp;#39;s midsection.At the end matters all come to a head, with Brad and Sarah, with Ronnie, and with his erstwhile nemesis, Larry, and a lot of tension is created through Hitchcockian cross-cutting between these climaxing threads.Field has avoided the extreme finale of his first film -- this one shares such heavy concerns as families, infidelity, crime, and confronting death, but by contrast, this ending, though breathless and troubling, is ultimately sweet and marked by reconciliation and acceptance. One may wonder if underlying issues have really been resolved. The film feels somewhat overlong, but the nuanced characterizations and fine acting and the attractiveness of the central couple entertain and interest us mightily.Perhaps the one weakness overall is a slight uncertainty of tone, which explains why some viewers are troubled by the voice-over (and also by its long disappearance midway). If situations are seen primarily as highly serious or even horrifying, it&amp;#39;s hard to see how the satirical feel fits in, and at the end we seem to have lost touch with where we started out. Ultimately as with so many American stories on film, the writers seem to have tried to tackle too much material. Nothing wrong with that, but they haven&amp;#39;t quite got the world view to encompass it all. Technically though Field has achieved more polish and shown more confidence, even compared to his already admirable and powerful first film of five years ago. The cast is wonderful, well chosen and well used. Field is an experienced actor: he knows the craft. This has got to be a film to think about at year&amp;#39;s end when best lists are made up.Kate Winslet, Jackie Earle Haley and the film&amp;#39;s screenplay were all nominated for Oscars this year. </description>
<category>Video</category><guid isPermaLink="false">58673@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:42:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>