<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Author: Alicatte Amp</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 3 Aug 2005 23:17:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Announcement: Short-content feeds</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<author>Phillip Winn</author><description>Sunday, August 26, 2007, marks the switch of all Blogcritics.org article feeds from full-content to short-content. This is the result of several converging factors, and is unfortunately a permanent decision (as permanent as any decision can be on the web, that is). We are aware of all of the reasons that this is a Bad Idea, and we are aware that some of you will be quite upset about having to click on something to read the free content, and we&#039;re sorry. Unfortunately, despite great effort, full-content feeds are not currently economically viable.

Two other factors are involved: full-content feeds have resulted in an unprecedented level of content theft, with BC content appearing on many websites, usually spam sites, without attribution or permission. This duplicate content causes a cascading set of problems, not the least of which is that search engines generally aren&#039;t favorable to duplicate content, and don&#039;t always guess correctly. Finally, our RSS advertising partner is strongly in favor of short-content feeds.

We hope that you&#039;ll continue to subscribe to BC via RSS, and when an article grabs your eye, it&#039;s only a click away, still free on the BC website. Thank you for your understanding.</description>
<category>Administration</category><guid isPermaLink="false">0@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Where Have You Gone, Mark Ruffalo?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/03/231717.php</link>
<author>Alicatte Amp</author><description>Oh, well, another actor sells his soul. Remember when Mark Ruffalo came out in You Can Count on Me (yes, a horrible title, but a great film--because of Mark Ruffalo). His performance was exciting; it felt unpremeditated and raw and real. Well, I recently saw this ad for Just Like Heaven plastered on a subway entrance, and my heart sank.
My distaste for this ad is right up there with Must Love Dogs.  There&#039;s little Mark Ruffalo staring longingly up at box office jackpot Reese Witherspoon.  Mark Ruffalo wants to be a big, big star. And it seems that he&#039;s chosen films based on whose name is on the marquee.  Unfortunately, most of them have tanked. Here are some of his recent bombs: The Last Castle, Windtalkers, View from the Top, all starring big stars with whom he hoped to align himself. (Robert Redford, Nicolas Cage, and Gweneth Paltrow, respectively.)  I do admit that he was the saving grace in  In the Cut, but he had to share the screen with Meg Ryan.  No thanks. And, yes, he made The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind with Jim Carrey, but do you really remember his even being in it?His last  movie 13 going on 30, I think, did pretty good box office, so maybe he is counting on that. Besides both flicks being supposedly &quot;romantic comedies,&quot; I see one very distinct similarity: his picture in both ads is teeny tiny. That&#039;s the price of fame, I guess.You can check out my other reviews at Amppower</description>
<category>Video</category><guid isPermaLink="false">33624@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Aug 2005 23:17:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Amazing &quot;Life and Limb&quot; Exhibit</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/08/02/231759.php</link>
<author>Alicatte Amp</author><description>&quot;Life and Limb&quot; at Feigen Contemporary gallery, located at 535 West 20th Street, New York, is the type of exhibit that reminds why you trudge about those streets of Chelsea. As soon as you enter the gallery, you can tell that this group show features artists who are masters of technique, craftmanship, and interpretation. The show ends Aug. 12, so hurry to this amazing show.Here are my favorite images:&quot;Daedalus and icarus,&quot; Tim DavisThat flashbulb effect is a part of the artwork.  I almost bought this one.  In person, it&#039;s quite arresting.
harvey dargerThis image is free floating.  There&#039;s an image on the back of it as well.
&quot;Double Portrait,&quot; Paul HodgsonLoved this one.  It reminded me of the recreations of paintings in Derek Jarman&#039;s film &quot;Caravaggio.&quot;
&quot;Untitled,&quot; Nicky HobermanThis pastel on paper was quite affecting.  It&#039;s big, and the little girls&#039; stares dare you to look away.Check out my other reviews and comments.
</description>
<category>Culture</category><guid isPermaLink="false">33533@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:17:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>