OPINION

Despite Program Failures, 2008 Republican Platform Calls for Increased Funding for Abstinence Education

Written by Tom Hanson
Published September 09, 2008

With the recent selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate, Presidential candidate John McCain reinforced an ongoing Republican alignment with conservative Christians. The Alaskan Governor has been a strong proponent of both creationism and abstinence education for public school students.

Directly after McCain’s selection of Palin, the Republican Party formally released its platform for 2008. Among the educational planks was a commitment to pursue increased funding for abstinence education.

Support for Abstinence Education Dissipating

While the Republican stance sought to increase funding for the program, abstinence-only education has been losing steam in recent years. According to the web site WebMD Health News, “Seventeen states, including California, have opted out of the programs, choosing to forgo federal funds and instead teach about abstinence along with contraception, including condom use.”

A recent Associated Press article confirmed that data, noting “that participation in the program is down 40 percent over two years.” And while 28 states are still in, the AP reports that “Arizona and Iowa recently announced they will pull out at the start of the upcoming fiscal year.”

The end result is that of the $50 million budgeted for three possible Title V abstinence education programs only $21 million has actually been distributed.

Abstinence Only Education Deemed Ineffective

Though it is hard to imagine cash-strapped states forgoing potential funds for education in any form, recent data demonstrates that abstinence-only programs have failed to produce the desired outcome. Such programs show no evidence of delaying kids' first sexual experience nor have the programs been effective in reducing teen pregnancies for those who do have sex.

In discussing abstinence-only education, Harvey Feinberg, MD and President of the Institute of Medicine, noted a recent summary by the Cochrane Collaboration. Feinberg indicated that of 13 studies testing abstinence-only education, not one showed an “enduring effect” on teen’s sexual behavior.

"To limit them (sexual education programs) to abstinence-only does not comport with the evidence,” states Feinberg.

Despite that data, abstinence proponents point to recent teen pregnancy rates for support. According to the National Survey of Family Growth, pregnancy rates “have fallen from 117 births per 1,000 females in 1990 to 76 per 1,000 in 2002.”

However, John Santelli, a professor of population studies at Columbia University, indicated that "most of the 35% drop occurred before 1998, when two separate federal abstinence-only programs were started."

Skepticism Amidst a Rigid Curriculum

page 1 | 2
After 30+ years in education, Tom retired in June of 2007 to spend more time with his family. A parent, grandparent, teacher, coach and administrator, he truly “relishes the opportunity to share his thoughts on the challenges facing educators and families in today’s complex world.”
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!

Comments

#1 — September 9, 2008 @ 23:48PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

Actually this is quite clever. When one's learning about how Jesus invented DNA, studies show teenagers' sex drive dramatically decreases.

Teach both? Shit, teach all three.

#2 — September 10, 2008 @ 01:42AM — Silas Kain [URL]

Hmm, Matt. Jesus and 12 guys holed up in an attic drinking wine, eating "herbs" and chowing on lavosh bread while wearing togas on a Thursday night. Somehow I don't think everyone abstained that night. Oh, Lord, I feel the hate coming.

#3 — September 10, 2008 @ 02:17AM — jamminsue

Tom, excellent article: You said: given that Governor Palin is a proponent of abstinence education, the recent revelations regarding her teenage daughter, Bristol serve as additional evidence that the abstinence-only message simply does not cut it with adolescents.
I dislike being rude or saying inflammatory things, but am not sure how else to express this: How can one expect rationality or consistency from the Christian Right? They have been programmed (maybe they were never allowed to think) to have a very strident and cruel response to anyone who suggests anything but abstinence, despite overwhelming proof that it does not work (Remember Nancy Regan's "Just say no"?). The attachment and monomania to ideas surrounding creating human life that may have been good at the end of the Plague or maybe the Flood is sad and confusing to the rest of us. The rest of us somehow manage to think and learned the Law of Minimum. We understand humans have no predators and have controlled disease, consequently, the population explosion is dangerous.
This knee jerk response is the factor that won George HW and George W their Presidencies. Until these monomaniacal people lose their political clout, and are relegated back into the dark ages where they belong, the rest of us somehow have to find an issue to re-focus those who have followed this vocal minority and try to get some sanity back as the predominant voice in this country.

#4 — September 10, 2008 @ 07:00AM — Lisa Solod Warren

Just say NO never works, never will.

#5 — September 10, 2008 @ 09:53AM — Joanne Huspek [URL]

My kids went to Catholic school, where abstinence only is the only thing taught. Did the students there follow the direction of their health and religion teachers? From what I can determine: NOoooo... They are kids, and the natural tendencies of most teenagers is to do exactly the opposite of what their parents and teachers preach.

Parents are most responsible, and they must provide all information and ALL options.

No matter how diligent, it's hard to just say "no" above the flush of raging hormones.

#6 — September 10, 2008 @ 11:40AM — Dr Dreadful [URL]

Wasn't "Just Say No" an anti-drugs campaign?

Still, the point is clear. Look how well that one worked out.

#7 — September 10, 2008 @ 13:26PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

"Just say NO never works, never will."

Worked for most of the girls I dated.

#8 — September 10, 2008 @ 13:34PM — Dr Dreadful [URL]

With those eyebrows, Matt, I'm not surprised!

;-)

#9 — September 10, 2008 @ 14:47PM — Cannonshop

If your fear is that saying no might not work for your little girl, I recommend the gift of Pepper Spray and a stun-gun. These accessories go very well for the young lady on the go, and they're less controversial than a handgun or good knife. (though it would, imho, be better if we could give young women access to, and training with, both.)

If you're afraid she WON'T say "No", well...that's different. Democrats have their quixotic causes, and this one's the Republicans' quixotic cause. Whether SHE says "No" or not is strongly influenced by her natural inclinations combined with her own reasoning capacity and decision making structure. Obviously, for example, Bristol did what millions of Preachers' kids do, and defied Mom...with consequences. But I defy any Democrat to find five teenagers who don't know what a Condom is for, or that Condoms are widely available cheap in the same places they use fake I.D. to buy smokes and beer.

#10 — September 10, 2008 @ 17:03PM — Baronius

Studies have shown that abstinence-only education doesn't work, but abstinence-only programs do. They typically combine education with counseling or some reinforcements.

#11 — September 10, 2008 @ 17:04PM — jamminsue

"Just Say No" was the anti-drug policy put in place by President Ronald Regan, the man who declared ketchup is a vegetable.

I was not referring to male rape, only that kids will experiment no matter what. Experimentation is part of the process towards becoming an adult. For healthy individuals, sex drive is farily strong during puberty and young aduthood. So having proper education on how human reproduction works and some options to hopefully delay the ultimate result, is not sinful or encouraging kids to experiment, it is recognizing a fact of human biology and giving kids CHOICES.

Isn't that what America is all about - education, choice and freedom of expression?

#12 — September 10, 2008 @ 17:34PM — Baronius

If you remember the culture of the 1970's, you'll know that "Just Say No" was actually a pretty important thing. It was the first time in a long while that anyone took an anti-drug stand.

#13 — September 11, 2008 @ 16:35PM — jamminsue

I never knew a time from when I remember - early 1960's, ever since - when there was concern about drug use.

Even during the Summer of Love there was concern

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/80970)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments