Why The Maverick Stands Alone
Published August 30, 2008
Sometimes the enemy of my enemy is his own shadow. Such can be said of a man who must walk as fast as he can towards the camera lights as his own campaign demons sneak up behind him. It is for these reasons that John McCain has my sympathy. He is not only battling the charismatic force of nature standing across the podium from him but he also has to repress the corrupting influences trying to whisper into his ear on a daily basis. These influences are black as night, drenched in oil and brimming with a confidence unique to a good con man. They know full well that they can pin Senator Vietnam down on the mat, yank his wallet and steal his lunch money. They know because they have done it before.
Back in 2000, the then honorable John McCain was fighting a trench war against Governor George W. Bush in the Republican primaries. McCain was up against the wall and likely to lose with values voters but that wasn’t enough for the nasty Neocon brigade. They didn’t just want to win over Johnny Mac, they wanted to mortally wound him. McCain is the kind of Republican that the Neocons can do without. He is a self-described maverick, a man who thinks for himself. He is brutally honest, unafraid of confrontation and always willing to speak his mind. He will stand up to any authority figure or group, no matter how loud they yell. He is an island and thus, he is uncontrollable. He is a barrier against those who wish to use the Presidency as a tool for stealing wealth. John McCain is a real threat and so, they cast every deadly aspersion possible in his direction. He was accused of siring a black baby, being a Manchurian candidate and suffering shell shock that made him incapable of taking office. He was irreligious, a hater of Christians, a secret liberal who had too many close friends on the blue team. He could not be trusted. He was broken beyond repair. He was angry. He had secrets.
When the dust had settled, Johnny Mac was still standing, but his Presidential ambitions had been pulled down around his ankles. The Neocons had succeeded in hurting him, but the wounds were not fatal. In the following eight years he healed. He found a way to appear as if he were walking in lock step and prepared himself for a position of ascendancy. When Republicans crowned the next most likely candidate for the throne, he was there. That time is now, but one thing is different. Unlike Governor Bush, John did not bring along his own cadre of ambitious marketers. He instead inherited many of the same Neocons who tried to bury him back in South Carolina. They have become his shadows. They have promised him the same power and accolades given so freely to his predecessor, but with a price. The Maverick attitude had to go, but can it?
Writer, adventurer, political activist, Alex Hutchinson has risked his life to deliver great stories for the reading public. He has fought in the now banned club boxing circuit, faced mock opponents in the wrestling ring, trained with the U.S. Army, traveled with the circus, and shared his experiences in seven books. In his new book Purple State, Alex faces his most dangerous arena: the world of national politics.
- Why The Maverick Stands Alone
- Published: August 30, 2008
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Books: History, Books: Politics and Affairs, Culture: Society, Politics: Elections and Candidates, Politics: Law and Rights, Politics: U.S.
- Writer: Alex Hutchinson
- Alex Hutchinson's BC Writer page
- Alex Hutchinson's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
- RSS Feeds
- All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article- BC articles by Alex Hutchinson
- Books: History
- Books: Politics and Affairs
- Culture: Society
- Politics: Elections and Candidates
- Politics: Law and Rights
- Politics: U.S.
- All Politics Articles
- Alex Hutchinson's personal weblog
- All Opinion articles
- All BC articles
All BC Comments
Comments
Gawd... politics is a dirty business. Just when I was starting to feel rosy and positive, too.
Joanne,
It certainly is. It's also a major reason why the best people rarely go into politics, so we're stuck with having people who are second and third best (or worse) running the country.
"so we're stuck with having people who are second and third best (or worse) running the country"
that hardly does the situation justice Clavos.
What we are stuck with are people that believe their own ambition justifies baselessly savaging the character and lives of others while and also having the character and lives of their own friend's and family savaged.
What we are stuck with is people that will look you in the eye and lie to you time and time again so that they maintain their power.
What we are stuck with is have other people imprisoned or even killed in order to obtain or maintain their power.
Let's not sugarcoat things folks. It's a mad world out there. Make you sure you brought you cup and check your soul at the door if you want to get in the game.
As bad as all the "savaging" is, it's certainly nothing new. Politics were much more heated and underhanded during the early years of the country.
Each electoral cycle, as the intensity renews, it seems that the people running campaigns and their surrogates try to push the envelope further than the last. Things get edgier, more personal and the focus on actual issues tends to diminish proportionally. And there are always loose cannons out their that, having their own agenda, put out a large part of the really off the wall stuff.
Yes, the attacks on Palin have been harsh and mostly without merit. Also, consider Corsi's compilation of baloney, "The Obama Nation" which is selling like hotcakes - (mainly in bulk sales, interestingly enough.)
While some people undoubtedly take some of these things to heart, by and large it seems to me unlikely that the election will be unduly affected by most of this crap.
B
An excellent point, Baritone. some of these scandals are downright silly (The Edwards baby tempest-in-a-teapot, for instance, or the Bush Sisters' little alcohol problems-something that anyone who grew up around PK's (PReachers' kids)would tend to expect...) Some proceed from silly to downright ridiculous (Clinton's BJ in the oval office? there were far more substantial issues, like the Grand Staircase Escalante coal-deal for Riaty, but the damn pols focused on something ridiculous.)
Personally, I tend to blame forty years of educational degradation and concern for "Self Esteem" issues for it-raise kids without teaching them to think critically, they'll drool and focus myopically on lowest-common-denominator pap.
Good article. Much the same is going on in the dems with the Clinton faction.
the neocons effectively neutered McCain on Larry Kings program after the SC primary when McCain mildly chastised Bush for the lurid lies Rove spread about McCain, and Bush aggressively confronted McCain and said noone could accuse him of running a dirty campaign. McCain submitted. Not a hero.
And now, for the thousandth time I'm hearing some character at the rep convention praising mccain for being so heroic against his vietnamese captors.
He missed his chance to prove his heroism against Bush.
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/80654)
Alex -
Every once in a while I read a blog post that is not simply well-written, but puts out information that I didn't expect, and from which I can learn. Yours is such a post.
Now I don't berate myself quite so much for having supported McCain (if only in spirit) in 2000. Yours is a cautionary tale that of those who stand up to The Man - whether it is the NeoCon Machine, a corrupt military officer entrenched in his position, or even just a schoolyard bully - not everyone survives the encounter with their career or their integrity intact.
Well done, Alex, and thanks for the lesson.