OPINION

Bonds To Boston? No Way, No How

Written by Charlie Doherty
Published July 17, 2008
page 1 | 2 | 3

Thirdly, Bonds is past his prime and approaching his mid-40s, as he turns 44 years old this month. And despite his amazing productivity last year at age 43—he had 28 HRs in 126 games and an astounding major league best .480 OBP in 2007—he can’t be expected to put up big numbers now at this age (except maybe walks), especially with more than half the season gone. Age is also a reason it’s no lock Bonds would play the last two-plus months of the season full-time and stay perfectly healthy. Sure, being a DH on an American League team (Red Sox, Tampa Bay, etc.) cuts down chances of getting hurt, but there’s no telling how those old joints and knees of his will hold up running the bases. And if such a setback should occur, you know the older one is, the more time it take the body to physically recover (without cheating, of course).

Fourth reason: Though some wouldn’t mind, I don’t think a majority of Sox players as a group would want Bonds, with the legal baggage and self-centeredness he carries to the clubhouse. The Sox don’t need another isolated superstar (like former Sox great Nomar Garciaparra). They’ve got other options, which I’ll get to later. Overall, Bonds is just a hard personality to accept and deal with as a teammate. Ask the Giants and Jeff Kent, who feuded with Bonds at least 7 times in SF over many years. Besides, it’s hard to see Big Papi and Jason Varitek, two of the game’s most highly respected players in the league, associating themselves with one of the most controversial figures in modern sports. I don’t think they want to win that badly.

Reason five: A majority of Sox fans wouldn’t and in fact, do not support the idea of the acquisition, if the highly passionate Internet and local radio reaction is any indication. And with a market as large as the Red Sox have, an upset and divided fan base—many of whom would bring “asterisk” and other anti-Bonds signs and chants to Fenway again, like they did in June of 2007—during the heart of a pennant race is the last thing the Sox ownership wants.

On the other hand, some of those fans may say all is forgiven if Bonds comes here and hits game-winning homers in Ortiz’s absence and helps the Sox make the playoffs and win it all again. They may justify switching feelings about him by claiming Bonds must be “clean” now, so why root against him? And to that I say not only is your view in the minority, but forgiving and forgetting what a man of bad character and morals has done, to baseball records and his own once-incredible career—not to mention his family via the alleged infidelity with former mistress Kimberly Bell, who felt “threatened” by him, as written in Game of Shadows—is impossible to do, at least for me.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Pro musician and journalist of many stripes: most recently a sports/music analyst for BC mag on BlogTalkRadio.com and sports correspondent for Brookline TAB; music critic/op-ed contributor at Umass-Boston newspaper 'til '06; media analyst at 2004 DNC in Boston. chucko33.blogspot.com, myspace.com/charlied
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Bonds To Boston? No Way, No How
Published: July 17, 2008
Type: Opinion
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Sports: Baseball
Writer: Charlie Doherty
Charlie Doherty's BC Writer page
Charlie Doherty's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Charlie Doherty
Sports: Baseball
All Sports Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 18, 2008 @ 17:49PM — Sam weaver [URL]

Charlie, indictment is not a conviction. When it comes to personal likes and dislikes of a city, you do not have to like a place to play. This is about trying to win and that is the only thing that counts in sports. A lot of baseball players will never win a good citizenship award. Bonds is a freak of nature and Fenway would be a good fit for him. When it comes to blocking out distractions, Bonds has proved that he can do that. Signing him would certainly add
an element of adventure.

#2 — July 18, 2008 @ 21:25PM — AJ


I hope he still dislikes Boston and I couldn't care less as to his reasons why.

I hear the Yanks are interested.....PERFECT!

#3 — July 18, 2008 @ 22:02PM — Charlie

Sam, no kidding that an indictment is not a conviction. Perhaps you missed what I wrote in the second paragraph of page 1: "...Bonds was indicted for...offenses" that could land him in jail, "if convicted"?

Also, you don't really think Bonds is innocent, that he wasn't a steroid abuser, do you? [Bonds said he did steroids to the grand jury, just that he thought they were "the cream" and "the clear." Yeah right. Greg Anderson is on tape saying he helped Bonds elude at least one positive drug test, and Kimberly Bell never actually saw him do them in person, she saw the effects of his drug use and heard him talk about doing steroids, as documented by federal investigators and in GAME OF SHADOWS.]

#4 — November 26, 2008 @ 09:53AM — CHAZ_D

Jason Bay you say?.. how did you ever guess or did Theo take this idea from you?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/79145)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments