OPINION

The Emmys Don't Get It Abysmally Wrong

Written by Diane Kristine
Published July 17, 2008
page 1 | 2

Shrugging

  • I’m no fan of Two and a Half Men but it does what it does well and there’s no other traditional-format sitcoms in the race, so I won’t sneer at it, either. As long as it doesn’t win.
  • I’ve never been captivated by Friday Night Lights, but I recognize the quality of the show and think it was Emmy worthy in its first season. This season, acting nods would not have been out of place but the plotting was a trainwreck. I struggled to watch despite having the motivation of going to the Paley Festival panel and seeing Jason Katims at the Banff TV Festival. Critics and fans are annoyed by the snub, but I’d have put this in the Scratching My Head category if it had landed a best show nomination.
  • It’s astounding to me how quickly I went from having Grey’s Anatomy in my top three shows to not caring - and even being a little viciously gleeful - that it was nearly shut out of the awards this year. They broke the show I fell in love with and every time I try to tune in now, I can’t find traces of what I ever liked about it.

Scratching My Head

  • The Wire and Pushing Daisies got writing nominations – yay! – but no best show nominations – boo!
  • I’m not as outraged as I should be by The Wire never securing a best drama nod despite being possibly the best show I’ve seen, partly because I had no expectations it would, partly because it is an intense, complex viewing experience lacking the pure entertainment value of a House or a Lost or whatever. But I can’t understand why, after finally getting some buzz this season, voters didn’t leap at their last chance to nominate the show.
  • I know critics and reporters care deeply and it’s all they can talk about, but do viewers and readers give a flying fig if a nominated show is on basic cable versus premium cable versus network? Other than the fact that it means far fewer of them will be rooting for those shows to win because, given cable’s far smaller audiences, they haven’t seen them? I get it: history was made and basic cable shows were nominated. Not to be confused with the gripe in previous years that premium cable shows were nominated over worthy broadcast network shows only because of the HBO cachet. Yawn.

page 1 | 2

Diane is a publications manager who's addicted to television, movies, and books and justifies her pop culture obsessions by writing about them for Blogcritics. She also runs the TV, Eh? website, a compilation of news and information about Canadian television series.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Emmys Don't Get It Abysmally Wrong
Published: July 17, 2008
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Awards Shows
Writer: Diane Kristine
Diane Kristine's BC Writer page
Diane Kristine's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Diane Kristine
Video: Awards Shows
All Video Articles
Diane Kristine's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 17, 2008 @ 16:13PM — El Bicho [URL]

"No writing nomination for 'House's Head,'"

Do you know if it was even submitted? The producers only submit a few episodes for consideration

"The Wire...being possibly the best show I've seen...an intense, complex viewing experience lacking the pure entertainment value of..."

I think we had chatted previously in the comments after you caught an early season. Glad to see you liked it so much as well. However I would agree to disagree with your assessment of its lacking entertainment value compared to those other shows.

#2 — July 17, 2008 @ 16:19PM — Diane Kristine [URL]

According to Gold Derby "House's Head" was submitted, so that's why I had my fingers crossed.

I think I'd have to write one of my normally verbose posts to fully explain what I mean by The Wire's relative lack of entertainment value, because I don't mean it to detract from the show at all, though I know it can't help but come across as an insult. The short version is it's not an easy show to watch, though.

#3 — July 17, 2008 @ 18:28PM — El Bicho [URL]

Well then you had a right to frown.

I do know what you are saying about The Wire. To many people there's an element of escapism they want in their entertainment, and The Wire brings home too many issues people don't want to deal with.

#4 — July 17, 2008 @ 18:36PM — Diane Kristine [URL]

Fine, you just explained in a sentence what I thought was too complicated to express quickly.

#5 — July 17, 2008 @ 20:01PM — El Bicho [URL]

heh, sorry. I've had a lot of practice ineffectually pleading the case why people should watch the series.

#6 — July 18, 2008 @ 05:44AM — Nancy

Diane, HOW could you possibly utter in public that HUGH LAURIE will not win the EMMY?????? HAVE FAITH!!! COLLECT MONEY for bribes. Just DON'T say he won't win.

I BELIEVE that he will win and he deserves to win. He works harder than anyone I know. What with the accent change, the cane, the amount of screen time and dialog..... He works TOO hard as a matter of fact.

He NEEDS to be honored and awarded for that alone. Not to mention what an AMAZING actor he is.

So....ya wanna take what you said back?

#7 — July 18, 2008 @ 10:10AM — Diane Kristine [URL]

Ha, sorry, I don't believe in The Secret ;) Whatever I say or wish for makes no difference, though I do wish for Hugh Laurie to win. Wanna hear something terrible? I actually think Jon Hamm will win this year. Of course I will be very disappointed if Laurie doesn't, but an Emmy isn't his only reward for his hard work.

#8 — July 18, 2008 @ 19:17PM — sue

I believe Hugh Laurie has not won an Emmy because he is British. James Spader does not hold a candle to Hugh as far as acting and creating a memorable character. He has one big speech at the end of the show, and he plods along the same boring character the rest of the episode. Hugh is never the same from one second to the next. He has had stunning reviews, and the show is top ten because of him. I don't think Boston Legal breaks the top 20.

Hugh as a Brit is a threat to American actors. They don't want to reward Brits, for fear that producers and networks will bring in more of them and take their jobs. Hugh was credited with an influx of British actors two years ago. They will work for less money, and they can play Americans as well as Americans can.

If Hugh doesn't win this year, it will clearly show their bias.

#9 — August 6, 2008 @ 16:08PM — Mary [URL]

Like others here, I cannot understand why Hugh Laurie has not yet won an Emmy for his performance on "House"; he is absolutely overdue. However, even if he never wins one, I think that his performance as Gregory House will continue to be re-broadcast for many years to come, long after "Boston Legal" and James Spader's performance in it have faded from memory.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/79127)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments