REVIEW

Movie Review: Gonzo - The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson

Written by Rebecca Wright
Published July 17, 2008
page 1 | 2

To make a documentary, the filmmaker has to find something compelling or fascinating about his subject. After all, if you're going to spend months or even years immersed in a particular subject, it needs to feel worthwhile. There is no doubt that Alex Gibney admires Hunter S. Thompson a great deal. The film is filled to the brim with gushing celebrities — including Tom Wolfe, singer Jimmy Buffett, and politicians such as former president Jimmy Carter, presidential candidate George McGovern, and even conservative commentator Patrick J. Buchanan. Johnny Depp reads the narration and does a few on-screen readings of Thompson's writings.

hst.jpgUnfortunately, the constant flow of glowing tributes is ultimately the downfall of Gonzo. No time is given to opposing points of view or the drug and alcohol problems that crippled Thompson from the mid-seventies on. If the film purported to exam just Thompson's work, it would be easier to understand Gibney's apparent reluctance to dig deeper into the darker side of Thompson's life. Since Gibney did such a thorough job onTaxi to the Dark Side and Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, I tend to believe that his admiration for Hunter S. Thompson made it impossible for Gibney to leave his skepticism at the door, and instead mythologize his lifestyle of excess.

One interviewee says of Thompson's excesses, "You saw the stuff go in and there was no discernible effect." Oh, come on now, I don't think they even believe that one. He hunted in the woods with sub-machine guns and went for days without sleeping. On February 20, 2005 Hunter S. Thompson died at his self-described "fortified compound" known as Owl Farm in Woody Creek, Colorado, at 5:42 p.m. The cause of death was a self-inflicted gunshot to the head.

By telling only one side of the story, Alex Gibney has denied viewers the chance to gain a full understanding of one of America's most interesting and complex authors. While Gonzo: The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson isn't a bad film, it does feel woefully incomplete.

page 1 | 2
Rebecca is a freelance writer, concentrating in the areas of film, television and music criticism. Her B.A. is in the Humanities with an emphasis in film and writing.She holds an M.A. in American and British literature with an emphasis in dystopian literature and detective fiction.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Gonzo - The Life and Work of Hunter S. Thompson
Published: July 17, 2008
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Documentary
Writer: Rebecca Wright
Rebecca Wright's BC Writer page
Rebecca Wright's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Rebecca Wright
Video: Documentary
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 17, 2008 @ 18:36PM — El Bicho [URL]

"No time is given to opposing points of view or the drug and alcohol problems that crippled Thompson from the mid-seventies on."

I agree up to a point but I think they made it rather clear that was a part of his downfall, and really they rushed over pretty much everything mid-70s on.

He wasn't completely made out to be a saint as his first wife Sandy and others made clear.

I would have liked to have seen some legitimate detractors speakers, much like what took place in Ralph Nader's An Unreasonable Man.

"I don't think they even believe that one."

If his habit was as bad as the legend made out, that's possible, but I understand your skepticism.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/79101)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments