<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;In Cold Blood&lt;/i&gt; by Truman Capote </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:03:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Philip Spires on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;In Cold Blood&lt;/i&gt; by Truman Capote </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/07/13/165711.php#comment-755707</link>
<description>Dear shmow.

I bow to your accuracy. I am culpable. I have entered the word &quot;all&quot; in a sentence to indicate a collective of picture of events when, in fact, it is inappropriate. I accept the accuracy of your criticism. All of them did suffer as described, but not all of them suffered both fates individually.

Let&#039;s agree that they were all murdered. How does that change credibility of the review?

Best wishes</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">755707@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:03:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by shmow on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;In Cold Blood&lt;/i&gt; by Truman Capote </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/07/13/165711.php#comment-755657</link>
<description>Only Herbert Clutter&#039;s throat had been cut and no one else&#039;s. How can one trust your review if you can;t get the basic facts straight.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">755657@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:41:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>