OPINION

The McCain Enable Gets Inhibited

Written by Realist
Published July 08, 2008

Regular readers of my posts will note that I've not been very active over the past couple of weeks. The reasons are economic - gas prices are killing me!

My real-world employer refuses to consider putting us on a 4-10 schedule, because "only 5-8 works for our 7-24 operation". As a result, I took a second job as a fundraiser for John McCain.

McCain must be flush with cash now, because Carl Linger Jr. - who has given money to AUC and FARC, internationally recognized Columbian terrorist groups - gave the McCain campaign millions of dollars. I figured that I could expect that the check wouldn't bounce.

Ah, Summertime! And makin' the livin' is easy - NOT!

No one at the McCain campaign told me that wealthy conservatives feel that "McCain is really out of step with the strong majority of his party" and that McCain's platform - a 100-page document with all but nine pages mentioning Bush's name - is inspiring a convention revolt to block his views on global warming, immigration, stem cell research and campaign finance from becoming the Republican Party's official principles.

About 300 of these disgruntled ex-faithful belong to The Lincoln Club of Orange County, which is telling the GOP leaders of both the House and Senate - as well as other Republican donor groups - that they are tired of financially feeding the ever-increasing destruction (via the practice of earmarking, which grew 285 percent when Congress was under Republican control) of their future governance prospects. Rich Wagner, the group's president, and Chip Hanlon, a board member declare, "we refuse to support a permanent minority."

Well, gee, just what brought on this pique? Could it be that Americans blame President Bush for the economy being in lousy shape? That is grossly unfair, because other politicians besides Mr. Bush - most of them Republicans - share the blame for the mess we’re in.

Paul Krugman pronounces "J'accuse!":

Mr. Bush will be lucky to leave office with a net gain of five million jobs... Bill Clinton presided over an economy that added 22 million jobs.

Bill Clinton’s attempt to reform health care... failed — and let’s remember why. ...it was Republicans in Congress who blocked reform...

Before you Republicans get upset about this assertion, allow me to state that it was a lousy plan and deserved to be defeated. I don't think that things would be better now had it passed. But I digress.

Back to Krugman.

...oil prices wouldn’t be as high as they are... if we had taken steps in the past to limit our oil consumption. ...conservative Republicans in Congress, aided by Democrats with ties to energy-intensive industries, blocked conservation measures.

John McCain has gone to great lengths to affirm his support for Republican economic orthodoxy. So he’ll have no reason to complain if, as seems likely, the economy costs him the election.

Stuart Rothenberg thinks that McCain's only chance is to heighten uncertainty about Obama, but McCain seems instead to be heightening uncertainty about his own leadership abilities.

page 1 | 2
You don't have to be Pessimist to become Realist - but it certainly helps!
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!

Comments

#1 — July 8, 2008 @ 00:23AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Can the human mind actually survive on a diet of Paul Krugman or does it turn you into a demented goblin like your master?

dave

#2 — July 8, 2008 @ 15:07PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

Just admit you wrote this so you could use the "McCain Enable" pun.

#3 — July 8, 2008 @ 15:39PM — Dr Dreadful [URL]

"There is even a website for Republicans for Obama"

Hardly earth-shattering. There's one called Democrats for McCain as well.

#4 — July 21, 2008 @ 00:51AM — bliffle

McCain benefits from his flagrant disloyalty to his loyal wife being ancient history. Of course, that would hardly be a hindrance if it were Obama rather than McCain, since the reps have shown little hesitation to exploit anyone's past.

Overall, one might well be surprised at the dems lack of confrontational politics since the 2006 elections. They could have impeached Bush (or at least made a big noise about it) and could have blocked several bills, and could have forced Bush to use his veto, to his embarrassment. The dems acquiesced to so much retreat that it makes one wonder why. Are they just clueless? One hesitates to ascribe their submission to statesmanship. Or to lack of political cunning.

It's a mystery to me.

#5 — July 21, 2008 @ 01:00AM — Clavos

The Rothschilds made them do it...

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/78808)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments