OPINION

Mark Shapiro and Phil Savage: A Matter of Contrast

Written by Gary D. Benz
Published July 07, 2008
page 1 | 2 | 3

Savage, too, made absolutely the right decision in invoking an extreme makeover. The pre-Savage Browns were mostly a yearly embarrassment, nearly barren in legitimate NFL players. Almost any progress would have been appreciated, and there was some early, but unlike some of Shapiro's early moves with the Indians, Savage's early moves didn't show the same kind of visible progress. Savage's steadfast support of head coach Romeo Crennel is a good example.

Though Savage counseled patience, he remained quite active. When things got dicey so committed was Savage to his plan that he almost walked out in protest during a power struggle with then team president John Collins. Having prevailed, Savage has since been even bolder and focused on winning as much as quickly as possible. Savage, like Shapiro, would obviously like to build a machine like the one in New England. But for the time being, and much unlike Shapiro, Savage seems to want at least least one championship season first and then let the chips fall where they may thereafter.

Certainly the trade that brought in quarterback Brady Quinn was firm evidence of a general manager seeking more than gradual progress. But the rebuilding of the defensive line, easily the team's weakest link in 2007, was actually an even bolder move considering the circumstances. Coming off a 10-6 season, which usually is good enough to make the playoffs, it would have been easy to conclude that all this young team needed was another year to gel.

But here is where Savage and Shapiro parted ways. Savage wasn't mesmerized by the lure of having a team on the brink. He well understood its weaknesses and went about trying to fix them quickly. It may have cost the Browns a viable defensive backfield in the process, but you had to applaud the effort. One gets the sense that if Savage had been more like Shapiro he would have found more reasons than not to stand pat than move forward.

There really is no right formula when you have a team on the brink. It's a fair point to suggest that indeed sometimes all a good young team needs is another season together. But if you're going to go down that road, you just as often end up sacrificing greatness in order to be good. Make the gamble too many years in a row and pretty soon good is sacrificed as well.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Gary is writer based in Akron, OH. His take on the long-suffering fans of Cleveland sports can be found at Wait 'Til Next Year, Again (nextyearagain.blogspot.com) or The Cleveland Fan (www.TheClevelandFan.com). Please feel free to send your questions, comments, concerns or criticisms to GDBenz@roadrunner.com.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Mark Shapiro and Phil Savage: A Matter of Contrast
Published: July 07, 2008
Type: Opinion
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Sports: Baseball, Sports: Football (American)
Writer: Gary D. Benz
Gary D. Benz's BC Writer page
Gary D. Benz's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Gary D. Benz
Sports: Baseball
Sports: Football (American)
All Sports Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/78766)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments