Batman 3: No Room For Robins In The Knight
Published July 03, 2008
This problem comes to a head when Jason Todd, the second Robin, finally eats crowbar, courtesy of the Joker. But does that stop Batman from enlisting another partner only a few years later? Didn’t think so. Tim Drake comes along, a little bit older, a little bit quicker than the other two Robins, but a teen nevertheless. And one without the necessary penchant for vengeance that drives his predecessors (although the writer conveniently killed of Drake’s father a decade later).
But even the Lone Ranger — who has the essence of solitude in his name — had Tonto, right? Doesn’t someone have to prevent Bruce from tumbling into the chasm he peers into every night, holding him back from the one thing he cannot become? Yes, and his name is Alfred Beagle/Pennyworth. Trusted butler, medical surgeon, and chef extraordinaire, Pennyworth is like the Jesus of the 20th century. There is nothing he cannot do, from providing a rock for Bruce to stand on to keeping Batman’s focus on the oath to his parents. Alfred maintains Bruce’s touch with the outside world, keeps him grounded, and provides a buffer between Batman and the darkness that constantly threatens to consume him. As Michael Caine’s Alfred instructs Bruce, “Drive sports cars, date movie stars, buy things that are not for sale. Who knows, Master Wayne? You start pretending to have fun, you might even have a little by accident.”
Still, fun is the last thing Batman is after. A delayed vengeance, a constant yearning for his parents' approval, and a desire for harmony motivate him. So when the rumors surface of a Dick Grayson cameo in Batman 3, I can't help but laugh. Nolan's "real" vision of the Bat-universe is more in tune with the view I own, more than Bruce Timm and certainly more than Tim Burton, and in no way incorporates a prepubescent Robin onto the fold. Christian Bale, inhabiting the dark role in a way the soft Michael Keaton could only have dreamed, today said, "If Robin crops up in one of the new Batman films, I’ll be chaining myself up somewhere and refusing to go to work." Smart man, that Bale.
There is a scene in the upcoming The Dark Knight when the Joker, peering from the abyss of an interrogation room, war paint melting under the heat of insanity, poses Batman: “Does it depress you, to know how alone you truly are?” Taking the role of a psychiatrist (turned psychopath, á la Jonathan Crane), the Joker has stripped Batman layer by layer in the hopes of showing Bruce Wayne who, and what, he truly is: a loner, an isolated force of good, who will never find a shoulder to lean on when the burden becomes too heavy.
And in all-too-unironic twist, it's the Joker who is right.
- Batman 3: No Room For Robins In The Knight
- Published: July 03, 2008
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Books: Comics and Graphic Novels, Video: Action
- Writer: Casey Michel
- Casey Michel's BC Writer page
- Casey Michel's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
It depends on Warner Bros. approach to Batman 3. Whether or not they would want to continue the franchise is vital. Or at least one in a darker Nolan-based state of mind. If they do choose to go forward then they need to finish with a film called " The fall of Batman featuring the ultimate end of Bruce Wayne as Batman when he suffers permanent paralization from the waste down as a result of a backbreaker he receives from an evil muscle-bound Roid-freak character named Bane. The film should then focus on the transition of a new character as Batman who is an understudy to Wayne as Wayne was to Ros Al Guhl. Creating the opening for a new trilogy and a new title..."The Legend of Batman". How does that sound?
I think that if you put in the robin of the yellow and green tights variety then yeah you're in trouble, but I think a robin more of the nightwing variety is more plausible. They updated batman from the Adam West version, then they could (if they wanted to) update Robin.
The reason from my understanding why Batman took in Robin was because Batman saw himself in Robin. Robin not only added in the place for a kid to relate to, but he showed a part of Batman that remembered his past and the loss of innocence that he once had, I think.
Now does Robin fit into the new series of films with Christian Bale? I'm not sure... the film makers would have their hands full if they wanted to keep Epic and good, but that's not to say its not do able.
I think Robin's character served his purpose with the dark knight and now has moved on with the titans. I just didn't think he was a terrible character, I write alot and I think about these things. How the characters fit together and affect the audience is important and I don't think it should be ignore.
Robin is part of the batman universe but should not be used until the 7th or 8th film. I think a Robin is needed when batman gets older and wishes to pass on his legacy. As far as I am concerned Dick Grayson is the only Robin who later becomes Night Wing. The other Robin's make no sense and just suck. I don't want to see a big bulking super heroe parading the town with little kids. It's just sick. Comic writers need to fix this error...and improve the Batman legacy. only gayson makes sense.





Good post, I agree that Robin is an unwanted and ill advised component in this day and age. It feels so much more exciting seeing Batman having to make hasty decisions on life threatening scenes with little to no backup. Robin is at best a link to children and at worst a cheap hokey gimmick. These new Batman's aren't taking place in Chuck E. Cheese so Robin is unnecessary.