INTERVIEW

Interview with Judi Clark of MostlyFiction.com

Written by Mayra Calvani
Published June 29, 2008
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11

The final criteria is the time factor: If I don’t have much time, then I choose a review of a book that already has an author page so that I only have to refresh the bibliography and bookmark links when I post the review. If I have sufficient time, I will tackle one of the more prolific writers since I know the research will take longer. The well written review always has a better chance of getting published. Reviews that need a lot of editing sometimes never make it since by the time I can do the edit, the review is often no longer freshly written and it is too late to ask the reviewer to rewrite it.

Do you think there’s a lot of ‘facile praise’ among many online review sites? What is your policy when it comes to negative reviews?

I tell reviewers that they must finish a book to review it. If they don’t like a book, then let me know, but move on and find a book that they like. (Life is too short and we absolutely do not have time to read every book, so be choosy!) On the other hand, if they finish a book and by the last page decide that they do not like the book yet feel obligated to write a review to warn others away from it or to just want to air their disappointment, then I recommend that they tell the reader why they were compelled to finish the book (i.e. what is good about the book) and then say why the book disappointed.

When I am choosing the next review to post, I find that I tend to skip over the negative reviews that don’t meet this criteria and go for the ones in which the reviewer is recommending the book. However, when it is a well written review, then I do willingly post it, even if it is a negative review. If I read the book and agree with the reviewers comments, then I am more apt to post the negative review.

I basically believe that reading is subjective and one reviewer’s experience does not reflect all readers’ experience. I like a review that let’s me decide if I will like the book, whether I agree or disagree with the reviewer’s opinion of the book.

Do I think there is a lot of facile praise out there? Not among the bloggers and the ordinary people that like to write reviews. Because MostlyFiction.com links to other site reviews, I do read reviews from a lot of different sites. Certainly we all know that the Amazon.com system breeds “friends” of the authors – and sometimes I and the other reviewers are fooled. But, most people are sincere about their comments and reviews. Or maybe, I just have learned how to avoid the unhelpful reviews.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
Mayra Calvani is a multi-genre author and reviewer. Her paranormal books include Embraced by the Shadows (romantic horror/vampire) and Dark Lullaby (atmospheric horror). She is also the co-author of the nonfiction work, The Slippery Art of Book Reviewing. Visit her blog, The Dark Phantom Review.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Interview with Judi Clark of MostlyFiction.com
Published: June 29, 2008
Type: Interview
Section: Books
Filed Under: Books: Interview, Books: Nonfiction, Books: Reference, Books: The Writing Life
Part of a feature: The Slippery Art of Book Reviewing
Writer: Mayra Calvani
Mayra Calvani's BC Writer page
Mayra Calvani's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Mayra Calvani
Books: Interview
Books: Nonfiction
Books: Reference
Books: The Writing Life
All Books Articles
All Interview articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 30, 2008 @ 17:50PM — c hoare [URL]

Some interesting differences in the way MostlyFiction works. I like the idea of having links to other review sites and author sites. It suggests someone visiting the site will find more detailed information on both book and author -- and the author will have more substantial exposure than a few quick paragraphs vying with hundreds of others for reader attention.

Chris H.

#2 — June 30, 2008 @ 21:05PM — A. F. Stewart [URL]

Great interview, it sounds like you are doing a wonderful job with your website. I loved the thoughts on including the "where" in a review, along with the "how", "what", "who" and "when." I hadn't really considered that.

#3 — July 1, 2008 @ 07:28AM — Margay [URL]

Wow, what an in-depth interview! Thanks, Judi, for sharing your thoughts with us. It was very informative.

#4 — July 2, 2008 @ 01:07AM — RG

If bad reviews are discouraged, what's the point?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/78539)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments