<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:16:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Maurice Colgan on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-729492</link>
<description>David said quote.
&quot;Elvis, however, had something that no other artist of the time had and that was a charisma that would give him mass commercial appeal and quickly make him a lasting cultural icon.&quot;

On the other hand:

The beauty and charisma of Elvis Presley hardly explains the fact that a great many people on this side of the Atlantic, and the rest of the world outside the USA first heard Elvis Presley on the radio, or like myself on a jukebox,before we actually saw him, and were instantly smitten by his unique voice. That soulful, exciting, inspiring voice that still excites youngsters and oldies alike today, whenever they hear Elvis at his best.

Jim Burrows more or less wrapped up the rest with his inimitable style.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">729492@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:16:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brad Laidman on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-729491</link>
<description>Dig the London Calling inspired Front Cover

Buy the box set of Elvis complete 50&#039;s output - there literally isn&#039;t a song on it that you wouldn&#039;t want to own</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">729491@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:07:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jordan Richardson on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-729355</link>
<description>This is going to be cool. I&#039;m excited to follow along, David. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">729355@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:43:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jburrows on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-729028</link>
<description>Incidentally, I only referred to Presley and Halley, of the early rock founders who were not African Americans, since each and every one of those not mentioned,  can not claim to have fused any set of musical mediums on his own, like Berry did with &quot;Maybelline&quot;, albeit 11 months after Elvis had sone it,  with &quot;That&#039;s all right&quot;. 

We start with Carl Perkins. He played rockabilly, which Elvis had come up with 13 months before. 

Take Buddy Holly, Gene Vincent  and Eddie Cochrane, all either not into music or into country and western music until they turned to rocakbilly after either listening to, or seeing Presley live. 

Take Johnny Cash and Roy Orbison, each either   singing gospel or working as disc-jockeys until they  heard Presley`s first rockabilly record, with both getting into rockabilly as the first step into a life in either country,  or pop.

Take Ricky Nelson, a television child star who turned to rockabilly because he wanted, desperately, for his girlfriend to admire him for that, too. 

The career ( circa 1956-60), of anyone I have not mentioned, that was not an African American, that is, is a direct result of Presley`s influence, as well. 

Of the African Americans early rockers, there was one whom I  have not mentioned, and that was Ray Charles.  Like Elvis, he could handle pop, straight blues, r&amp;b, gospel, christmas songs  and  country music.  

That&#039;s a lot of music, not as much as Elvis, granted, but enough. 

Since he started at the same time as Elvis did, the question could be asked:  

Why wasn´t he the King? 

Of course, there are about ten answers to that, some political, some &quot;technical&quot;, some racially-based, etc, etc,  but the one that comes quicker to my mind is the following: 

He could not have been the King since he was quoted as saying he never liked Elvis (LOL). 

Of course, I am laughing at my own answer but just think about it, even for ten seconds; can you imagine a King that bad mouthes another performer, without ever having the chance to see him at work?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">729028@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:11:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jburrows on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-728970</link>
<description>Presley did not invent rock, but neither did Chuck Berry, Fats Domino, Little Richard, Bo Diddley nor Bill Halley. And the reason is simple: each had a different take on &quot;rock&quot;, because each was influenced by different set of R&amp;B and C&amp;W artists. Take this chronology:  Fats Domino&#039;s first record was in 1950. Little Richard, whose first record was in 1953, heard it, and so did everyone else of the ones I´ve mentioned, as well as Ike Turner, whose first record came out in 1952. So, would Domino be considered the main guy. No. Presley`s first record came out a year earlier than Berry&#039;s or Diddely&#039;s. So, why is he usually referred as the big guy? Well, what Presley had was that his musical background was ten times more varied than that of anyone of those we know call the founding members. 

Gospel music? Only Domino, Berry and Little Richard. By his own account, neither Ike Turner or Diddley ever played gospel music, let alone thought of it as their life`s work. What Presley first considered was to be a Gospel singer. 

Pop? Perhaps  Halley had a certain knowledge of it.  Mexican music?  Opera? Mario Lanza? Broadway music? Presley was the only one of every musician I´ve mentioned whose mother taught him everything there was to know about all of these musical idioms, and I am talking starting when Elvis was 7. And, he did not just know the music. He could sing it, too. To top it all,  of all the founding fathers of rock and roll, guess who was the only one whose first 13 years were spent in one place, Mississippi, the land of the Delta Blues,  no less, only to move, in his formative years,  to the actual cross roads of American Music, Memphis, TN. 

This guy`s musical palette was, how do I put it,  like  hard disk so full of different programs, (and this even before he stepped in the SUN Records, in the summer of 1953), that a musical genius such as Sam Phillips, who`d recorded a lot of blues, and R&amp;B performers since 1949, was in total awe at the magnitude of the knowledge that this 18 year old kid had, of every possible musical idiom then in existence, with the exception of jazz, who Elvis himself said, on numerous occasions, he just did not understand. 

And we can forgive him for that. He did not need to...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">728970@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:17:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-728956</link>
<description>totally agree on Elvis&#039; voice.

i&#039;d like to point out that some people have said that the first rock n roll song was &quot;Rocket 88&quot;, which came out a few years before &quot;Rock Around The Clock&quot;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">728956@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:18:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by David Bowling on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-728955</link>
<description>I am going with essential and not complete in the case of my Elvis reviews. Some of his soundtrack albums are best left alone. I will probably end my reviews with his death although there are a couple after that time I may include. I figure about 35 reviews. Also I have a new grandson and I will be visiting him in July so my reviews will not be an everyday affair at that time. Since he was named after me, he inherits my record collection when I&#039;m gone. Peace On The Journey, David</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">728955@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:16:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JC Mosquito on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-728953</link>
<description>Here&#039;s something a friend asked me to think about, and it makes perfect sense: Take any picture from the early days of rock and roll that has Elvis standing around with a bunch of regular people - audiences, stage crew, radio execs, whatever - then take a good look at the people standing AROUND Elvis. And really, you can&#039;t help but notice - but compared to Elvis, everyone else is just plain UGLY. He had the mojo, the savoire faire, the hot-cha-cha in the right place at the right time.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">728953@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:13:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian aka Guppusmaximus on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-728951</link>
<description>*Oops* I meant &quot;Indescribably Blue&quot;...
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">728951@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:08:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian aka Guppusmaximus on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-728948</link>
<description>The one thing you forgot to mention in comparison to Bill Haley &amp; Chuck Berry was Elvis Presley&#039;s voice! Granted Bill &amp; Chuck could freakin rock, no one sang like Elvis did on those first albums never mind his whole career! 

The man not only had charisma but he was the whole package. Listen to songs like &quot;If I can Dream&quot;,&quot;Memories&quot;,&quot;Something Blue&quot; &amp; &quot;Surrender&quot;.
These songs are from the 60&#039;s and his voice still surpasses 95% of the supposed talent in today&#039;s top 40!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">728948@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:03:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Pico on Music Review: Elvis Presley - &lt;i&gt;Elvis Presley&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/26/102403.php#comment-728933</link>
<description>Dsvid, if nothing else you are wildly ambitious in taking on the entire catalogs of legends like Elvis and the Stones. My hat&#039;s off to ya&#039;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">728933@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:05:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>