OPINION

The Good, the Bad and the Crazy: The Texas GOP Platform (Part I)

Written by Dave Nalle
Published June 25, 2008
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

A Reality Check

The problem with a lot of these resolutions is that while they represent the hopes and dreams of certain very vocal factions, they don't represent the mainstream of the nation or even the Republican Party terribly well, and they aren't the kinds of positions which candidates who actually want to get elected can effectively run on.

Look at some of the specific issues raised here in context. 57-58% of the public supports civil unions or gay marriage and 40-46% of Republicans do. 81% of the public supports at least some form of abortion and 31% of Republicans consider themselves 'pro-choice,' while almost half oppose any kind of ban on abortion. The situation is similar on Stem Cell Research. While support for federal funding is weak, support for the research itself is quite strong, with about 58% of the overall population in favor and 46% of Republicans supporting it. With all of these issues the numbers for independents who are key to any Republican victory run as high as or higher in the favorable column than the national average. Taking extremely conservative positions on these issues is a guaranteed election loser when you're a minority party which needs to win votes outside of your loyal base. If you've got a negative position on an issue and almost 50% of your own party doesn't agree with you, you've got a problem.

The content of the Texas Republican Platform is a telling reflection of how divided the party is and how potentially destructive the most extreme factions are. Yet consideration of political realities renders much of what's in the platform essentially irrelevant. Most of these extreme positions absolutely cannot make it to the national platform, and local politicians who want to get elected are going to have to ignore many of these resolutions, no matter what provisions are in the platform to try to force them to comply with it. For most Republicans with any political involvement at all, this platform is going to get stuffed in a drawer while they pretend it doesn't exist. It's ridiculously indulgent of counterproductive extremism and an embarrassment to a party which wants to have any kind of meaningful political future.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Dave Nalle has been a magazine editor, freelance writer, capitol hill staffer, game designer and taught college history for many years. He is Vice Chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus, working to promote liberty in the GOP. He designs fonts for a living and lives with his family just outside Austin. You can find his writings on politics and culture at Republic of Dave, on conspiracy theories at IdiotWars and on design and fonts at The Scriptorium.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!

Comments

#1 — June 25, 2008 @ 20:08PM — Pablo

Do people actually read this Dave? I sure don't.

#2 — June 25, 2008 @ 23:41PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Nice to see you found it anyway, Pablito. I know politics isn't really your thing, but for some of us looking at a document like this is a way of understanding where the Republican Party has gone astray and what problems we need to address.

Dave

#3 — June 26, 2008 @ 01:56AM — Pablo

[Edited]

Dave,

The republican party went astray? Ya dont say. I would have to agree, since um about the days of ole Abe, however Ike had one brief shining moment in his warning about the military industrial complex. Good luck with the good ole boys Davey. :)

#4 — June 26, 2008 @ 02:47AM — Pablo

Well I broke down and looked at your article Dave, I usually do sooner or later. I particularly liked the paragraphs under the "Preserving American Freedom" header.

You sure got your work cut out for ya. Sounds to me like those good ole boys down there are the cream of the crop, of the endearing right wing that I so much adore.

Good luck!

#5 — June 26, 2008 @ 06:19AM — Ruvy

Having been a delegate at numerous precinct caucuses and district conventions at various levels in Minnesota's DFL, I know that party platforms are worth little more than toilet paper. That didn't stop me from keeping my ears open for the inevitable pro-"Palestine" shit that got raised at various conventions and doing what I could to stop them. I usually didn't make it to the state convention (inevitably held in out of the way places like Moorhead or Eveleth), so once it got out of my district, I was usually politicked out.

A state party platform doesn't really matter, Dave. Maybe, in Israel it does, but not in the States. The only thing that really matters in any state government is the receipts coming in from sales taxes, income taxes, etc. And each government has its own mix of how the money comes in. All the rest is well, nice, if you know what I mean.

Unfortunately, being a policy wonk is primarily being a power wonk. The rest is just garbage.

#6 — June 26, 2008 @ 10:06AM — David

"One is the strongest statement possible on abortion, declaring that life begins at fertilization."

So how long 'til men are prosecuted for masturbating?

#7 — June 26, 2008 @ 10:21AM — Lee Richards

Thoughtful and interesting article, Dave.

I imagine a lot of the same things are happening in most state Republican meetings. Can a party so divided(and with so many weird people making nutty demands)long endure? Or will internal pressures(and election wipe-outs)make it blow apart like Vesuvius?

One of the best things for the Republican Party in the last few decades was the election of Reagan, re-energizing it and bringing a lot of new people in. It was also one of the worst things for the Party; Reagan encouraged the religious right and lunatic fringe to get involved as Republican insiders, taking the party into strange directions.

Bush(an anti-conservative if there ever was one) has succeeded in making "Republican" as much of a political epithet as "liberal" used to be, in the minds of many people.
***

Ruvy, money isn't all that matters in state government. When extremists such as the religious right take control, freedom is threatened or curtailed and life is much more unpleasant under their repressive attitudes and mandates. (They sometimes re-write state constitutions, change school curricula, re-district, refuse to compromise to get things done, preach rather than dialogue, etc.)

#8 — June 26, 2008 @ 10:43AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Don't worry, Pablo. The Ron Paul faction gets some of its points in later in the platform.

Ruvy. I agree that the platform doesn't matter much as a document of policy. However, as a statement of the beliefs and a sign of the degree of influence of various factions within the party it's very significant. That's why it is worth reporting on.

Dave

#9 — June 26, 2008 @ 12:44PM — Ruvy

Richard you missed the last line of my comment to Dave - Unfortunately, being a policy wonk is primarily being a power wonk. The rest is just garbage. That deals with all that you were talking about. I've dealt with these lovelies too, the pro-life dictator types who tried to take over the DFL club I belonged to. They eventually all found happy homes in the Republican Party, which is where would-be fascists belong.

#10 — June 30, 2008 @ 04:35AM — Randy Dixon

I'm a Ron Paul Republican and a Texas State delegate and often disagree with your criticisms of Dr. Paul's policies but on this post we are in total agreement.

#11 — June 30, 2008 @ 05:01AM — Cannonshop

#7
Lee, the same can be accurately said of the Democratic party. Depending on the level of and percentage of severe left-or-right at the state level, you can have a dictatorship of either Left, OR Right. Here in Washington State, for instance, the Democratic Party machine is effectively immune to change, and is rarely if ever restrained by the wording of the State's constitution. They don't even have to worry that much about state-wide elections, having districts that will generate fictional ballots that can be counted as real with total impunity, while their lickspittles in the state Supreme Court will rule against any initiative or ballot measure that does not please their leadership. They control the counters of the ballots, ergo, they control the outcome of elections, and there is NO serious or effective oversight. only the pretense of an election remains, and that's not even tried at real hard-the two dominant counties in the state use mail-in ballots, without any means of confirming if the voter whose ballot that is, even EXISTS as more than a signature forged on a registration form.

#12 — June 30, 2008 @ 11:20AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Even within a state you can have multiple areas of dictatorial control. While Texas is certainly dominated by the GOP, the City of Austin is just as firmly dominated by dictatorial leftists.

DAave

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/78403)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments