Anatomy Of A House Episode: "Airborne"
Published June 24, 2008
Though he made light of the accuracy of that particular point, Hoselton stressed that the show looks for the possible, not the probable, in its medical accuracy. "And as we know, just about anything is possible. There's pretty wide latitude there," he smiled.
He shared a story about his wife attending a seminar where the speaker decried the media's inaccurate depiction of mass hysteria: "For example, there was an episode of House ...." She had to point out that her husband wrote "Airborne," the episode that ends with passengers, including Cuddy, getting rashes, photophobia, vomiting, and other symptoms as a result of mass hysteria, while the original sick passenger has a bad case of the non-contagious bends.
Hoselton defends his research, saying those symptoms have indeed been seen in cases of mass hysteria. "I'm on Wikipedia about 75 times a day," he joked when asked about how he conducts research, before adding that the writers, who are responsible for coming up with their medical mysteries, draw on three doctors who act as medical advisors, as well as staff writer and doctor David Foster, a digest of medical stories in the media assembled by support staff, and their own files.
Each House story generally must contain three elements, Hoselton explained. One is a disease of the week that's extremely difficult to diagnose or can hide as something else, and that has the potential to be fatal. "If it's something that hurts their foot really, really badly, that's not good enough."
The second is a patient with a fascinating character story – like Midlife Crisis Fran, or, in Hoselton's first-ever episode for House, "Lines in the Sand", an autistic boy.
Third is an interesting way for House to interact with the first two elements. In "Lines in the Sand," for example, Hoselton played with the idea that "House is vaguely autistic himself."
And the episode needs an "outrageous House move, that brilliant, perfect thing he needs to do to diagnose the disease. We're always looking for cool things that are within the realm of reason."
The evolution of "Airborne" included attempts to get back into that realm when the "cool things" threatened to escape. One of House's theories was that his patient was a cocaine smuggler, with the drugs leaking in his bowels. Since knives aren't allowed on planes, Hoselton went to the props department for advice. "The props guy immediately knew what to do, which disturbs me," he joked. "I think he even had a catalogue of ceramic knives that don't set off the metal detector."
But a scene where House deduces which passenger might have smuggled such a knife on board strained credibility too far. A blade from a razor sufficed.
- Anatomy Of A House Episode: "Airborne"
- Published: June 24, 2008
- Type: News
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Drama, Video: Film and TV Business, Video: Television
- Part of a feature: House
- Writer: Diane Kristine
- Diane Kristine's BC Writer page
- Diane Kristine's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Thanks Heidi, it was fun to hear about and to write, too. There's so much more that goes into an episode than we usually think about as fans so it's fun to get a sneak peek behind the scenes.
It was such a specific set of circumstances that led to this article - I happened to be attending an event where Hoselton happened to be dissecting an episode as an instructional tool for industry types. Some of the DVD commentary gets into a bit of that kind of thing, too, but I'd love to hear more myself. I'm skeptical I'll get many more opportunities like it though!
Well, well this article explains why Airborne was one of the worst episodes ever, right behind ODOR. And Lines in the Sand, almost as bad.
I loved the Wilson side of Airborne, which I've rewatched over and over again BUT the House side just reeked of the ridiculous, especially on an airplane, post 9/11.
Diane,
It's always nice to read your article, such a treat, thank you.
I love the behind the scene dissecting of the ep and the story permutation. It's interesting that budget, time, etc. issues could change the outline of the story and even the focus. I also love that David Shore still has firm grasp of what the show is about, since both the examples Hoselton cited are good calls imo.
Wish we get more of this type of articles, not just about House even, any good show will do. It's fascinating to have a peek into the creative process in both writing and producing. It does sound like a constant struggling act, and if people being complacent, then the story will be even more improbable. If TV is like this, and it's a writer's medium to be able to give input and changes, no wonder movie is a even bigger problem without as much writer input.
Again, thanks for the fun read.
RealDeal, I'm not sure I follow your logic on how the article explains your dislike? You seem to prefer the parts that were changed. It wasn't my favourite episode but to me, the explanation of how it evolved doesn't really speak to that.
Thanks May! I love hearing about this kind of thing too but like I said, don't know if I'll get the opportunity again, at least not that in-depth. DVD commentary tracks sometimes get into similar territory, though.
While I loved the scene where House improvises a diagnostic team from the passengers, this episode will go down as one of my least favorites. I would have loved to have heard Hoselton's explanation for writing the unbelievable and absurd scenes with Chase and Cameron having sex in a SICK WOMAN'S BED and giggling about it afterwards in front of Foreman. That was truly one of the low points of this series and turned me off that romantic pairing forever.
Thanks for this insight. What goes on behind scenes is often as interesting as what goes on in front of the camera.
I thought Airborne was one of the worst episodes of the season. The medical story was interesting enough but House was a complete jerk (one of the first times I was repelled by him but not the last) and Cuddy brainless as well as spineless. What saved it for me was the story back at PPTH, although I found the Chase/Cameron sex on the patient's bed illogical and out of character, sex teases over story telling. I'm glad the budget restrictions forced them to put in the B story with Wilson and the team. I wish they had spent more time on that and less on showing House abusing Cuddy.









What a great article! I feel like I was watching "Airbone" behind the scene, which I totally love!
It's a matter of convenience if not budget or money. It's interesting to know the implications or reasons for having a plot or not, or having a character or not.
To me it's very interesting because I was wondering if the "extra" considerations of having Cole in the new team, like a casting for his son and a whole department set, and those sort of things, rendered the character not viable (lol) because even though we had months or years to glimpse anything else beside the hospital other than House's place (Cuddy's house, Cameron and Foreman's apartment); how many episodes until that part of Cole's life has to come up. Of course, I suppose there were a lot more reasons for picking Kutner (or Taub) over Cole, and perhaps none of them had to do with that. LOL!
I'm glad that David Shore, when not writing (or directing), has some say in what happens to his show, he doesn't wash his hands of it.
I wish there were an anatomy of every episode of House. :) Read or see the creative process of actually doing House. That was a great article. Any chances we will see more of these? I'll take any episode. When it's behind the scene, I like them all. (Even S4 >.<)