<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:10:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Joseph C. Cavella on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/20/121631.php#comment-727740</link>
<description>Get Smart movie review
As one of the writers of the original &quot;Get Smart&quot; TV series, I was dismayed by the new, flawed &quot;Get Smart&quot; movie--I never understood why remakes don&#039;t at least talk to the original material writers. Maybe it&#039;s a kind of immature tantrum, &quot;I want to do it myself, mom.&quot;
That said, for the writers of the next remake, here&#039;s a bit of advice: The essence, the fun of the Don Adams character was his child-like confidence and his bravado (not unlike the character often played by Bob Hope) presaging the inevitable catastrophic blunder. &quot;Sorry about that.&quot; 
Any writer charged with vetting agent 86 should start by studying the origin of the character, Don&#039;s early nightclub routines. His defense attorney bit: &quot;Look at those trim ankles, the well turned calf. Now I ask you. Are those the legs of a homicidal maniac?&quot;
Joseph C. Cavella
HowToWriteComedy.com
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">727740@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:10:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joseph C. Cavella on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/20/121631.php#comment-727739</link>
<description>Get Smart movie review
As one of the writers of the original &quot;Get Smart&quot; TV series, I was dismayed by the new, flawed &quot;Get Smart&quot; movie--I never understood why remakes don&#039;t at least talk to the original material writers. Maybe it&#039;s a kind of immature tantrum, &quot;I want to do it myself, mom.&quot;
That said, for the writers of the next remake, here&#039;s a bit of advice: The essence, the fun of the Don Adams character was his child-like confidence and his bravado (not unlike the character often played by Bob Hope) presaging the inevitable catastrophic blunder. &quot;Sorry about that.&quot; 
Any writer charged with vetting agent 86 should start by studying the origin of the character, Don&#039;s early nightclub routines. His defense attorney bit: &quot;Look at those trim ankles, the well turned calf. Now I ask you. Are those the legs of a homicidal maniac?&quot;
Joseph C. Cavella
HowToWriteComedy.com
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">727739@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:10:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joseph C. Cavella on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/20/121631.php#comment-727738</link>
<description>Get Smart movie review
As one of the writers of the original &quot;Get Smart&quot; TV series, I was dismayed by the new, flawed &quot;Get Smart&quot; movie--I never understood why remakes don&#039;t at least talk to the original material writers. Maybe it&#039;s a kind of immature tantrum, &quot;I want to do it myself, mom.&quot;
That said, for the writers of the next remake, here&#039;s a bit of advice: The essence, the fun of the Don Adams character was his child-like confidence and his bravado (not unlike the character often played by Bob Hope) presaging the inevitable catastrophic blunder. &quot;Sorry about that.&quot; 
Any writer charged with vetting agent 86 should start by studying the origin of the character, Don&#039;s early nightclub routines. His defense attorney bit: &quot;Look at those trim ankles, the well turned calf. Now I ask you. Are those the legs of a homicidal maniac?&quot;
Joseph C. Cavella
HowToWriteComedy.com
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">727738@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:09:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joseph C. Cavella on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/20/121631.php#comment-727737</link>
<description>Get Smart movie review

As one of the writers of the original &quot;Get Smart&quot; TV series, I was dismayed by the new, flawed &quot;Get Smart&quot; movie--I never understood why remakes don&#039;t at least talk to the original material writers. Maybe it&#039;s a kind of immature tantrum, &quot;I want to do it myself, mom.&quot;

That said, for the writers of the next remake, here&#039;s a bit of advice: The essence, the fun of the Don Adams character was his child-like confidence and his bravado (not unlike the character often played by Bob Hope) presaging the inevitable catastrophic blunder. &quot;Sorry about that.&quot; 

Any writer charged with vetting agent 86 should start by studying the origin of the character, Don&#039;s early nightclub routines. His defense attorney bit: &quot;Look at those trim ankles, the well turned calf. Now I ask you. Are those the legs of a homicidal maniac?&quot;

Joseph C. Cavella</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">727737@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:09:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by El Bicho on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/20/121631.php#comment-727636</link>
<description>The movie, while not as funny as the series, is not as bad as this review indicates.  I saw an early cut of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/757857/movie_review_get_smart_gets_rebooted.html&quot;&gt;film&lt;/a&gt; and while there were flaws in the story, thought it worked better than expected and had more laughs than a typical Hollywood blockbuster.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">727636@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:17:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Derek Fleek on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/20/121631.php#comment-727630</link>
<description>I&#039;m still probably going to see it. At least I now know what to expect. Thanks for the heads up Garon.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">727630@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:45:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Joanne Huspek on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/20/121631.php#comment-727574</link>
<description>Thanks for the review. I&#039;m thinking Steve Carell is tapped out. He&#039;s been playing the same character for his last six movies. Plus, all those wacky gadgets that made the TV show a success are now a reality. Can we all say &quot;ho-hum?&quot;

I think I&#039;ll wait for the DVD to come out.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">727574@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:58:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jordan Richardson on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Get Smart&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/20/121631.php#comment-727552</link>
<description>So Anne Hathaway was serviceable? I&#039;m in!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">727552@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:18:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>