REVIEW

Music Review: Coldplay - Viva La Vida (or Death And All His Friends)

Written by Glen Boyd
Published June 20, 2008
page 1 | 2

Not that there aren't a few problems. Coldplay were already a band that really didn't do a lot to hide their U2 influences. With the guy behind both The Unforgettable Fire and The Joshua Tree twisting the knobs, it was pretty much inevitable that some of those influences were going to creep into the mix.

Which they do, and right from the get-go I might add.

Take the opening instrumental track "Life In Technicolor," for example. As the swirling synthesizers and creeping sound of that chink-a-chinking guitar slowly bubble up to the surface, you almost expect the familiar lyrics "I want to run...I wanna hide" to bust through the mix at any moment.

Likewise on "Lovers In Japan/Reign Of Love," all of the piano in the world can't hide the trademark Eno layering, and the Edge-like chiming guitars lying just beneath the songs surface. For the second half of the song (there is after all a dual title here), they switch things up to what at first also sounds suspiciously like something straight out of "With or Without You" territory.

The thing is though, much as it sounds like Coldplay are trying to beat U2 at their own game here, I'll be go to hell if it all doesn't sound pretty damn gorgeous just the same.
I also have to give these guys their props for breaking out of their comfort zone somewhat here. As familiar as much of this will sound to anyone who has worn out multiple copies of The Joshua Tree, at least it represents some new musical territory for Coldplay. The fact is, in strictly musical terms, they are stretching out here.

Viva La Vida is definitely not the paint by numbers, verse, chorus, verse record you'd normally expect from this band.

On one of the most interesting tracks, "Yes," Chris Martin sings the lyrics in an uncharacteristically low register (no whiny falsettos here), as eastern sounding instrumentation swirls about in the background. Then just as quickly, the song shifts to the sort of multi-layered, psychedelic guitar sound that wouldn't be at all out of place on a Sgt. Pepper-era Beatles record.

This part of the song also really rocks by the way. And just when was the last time you heard somebody say that about a Coldplay record?

From there, fans of the more familiar romantic Coldplay sound will be able to take some solace in both the title track and the single "Violet Hill," which despite its slightly harder sound just hit #1 on Billboard's singles charts.

So as much as Viva La Vida sounds at times both like a band trying to reinvent itself after recently being stung by the critics, and at others like they are worshipping just a bit too much at the altar of U2, I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt here.

At least they're not trying to sound like Radiohead anymore.

The bottom line is that this is a damned good sounding record.

page 1 | 2

GlenSoprano

You'll find Blogcritics assistant music editor Glen Boyd sharing his Thoughtmares on his personal blogs The World Wide Glen, and The Rockologist. In a previous life, Glen was a music professional and journalist whose work has appeared in The Rocket, SPIN, Pulse!, and The Source. Glen is also seeking an active full-time writing gig. Will somebody please hire this man?
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Viva La Vida Viva La Vida
Coldplay
Music,
X&Y X&Y
Coldplay
Music,
A Rush of Blood to the Head A Rush of Blood to the Head
Music,

Music Review: Coldplay - Viva La Vida (or Death And All His Friends)
Published: June 20, 2008
Type: Review
Section: Music
Filed Under: Review, Music: Rock, Music: Pop, Music: Adult Alternative
Writer: Glen Boyd
Glen Boyd's BC Writer page
Glen Boyd's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Glen Boyd
Review
Music: Rock
Music: Pop
Music: Adult Alternative
All Music Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 20, 2008 @ 07:25AM — Mark Saleski [URL]

On the other hand, how on earth could you deny a song like "Clocks"?

it's really easy. i start with a cringe and then just go from there.

ok, not quite truthful. i do like "Clocks"...it's just everything else they do that i can't stand.

#2 — June 20, 2008 @ 07:53AM — Eric Whelchel [URL]

When someone who has turned me on to many great bands over the years gave me Coldplay's first album and told me I'd love it, I thought he was nuts after giving it a few listens. I haven't recovered from that moment yet.

#3 — June 20, 2008 @ 10:01AM — Jordan Richardson

So excited to get this.

My first Coldplay experience was actually seeing them at the Commodore Ballroom here in Vancouver as they were promoting Parachutes. Small...TINY...show with maybe a thousand people packed on to the Ballroom's legendary bouncy floor and Martin was going mad as though he was playing for tens of thousands. Bloody amazing show and I've been a fan ever since.

Seemingly a few seconds later they were playing packed arena shows.

#4 — June 20, 2008 @ 12:20PM — Tom Johnson [URL]

Aside from "The Scientist" (and, really, more due to Aimee Mann's cover of it on her deluxe version of Lost In Space,) I haven't really taken to much of anything Coldplay did in the past. I have to admit that I'm quite taken with this album and I would never have expected it. I blame it on Eno.

And James is surely the inspiration for the "Lovers in Japan" portion of that two-part track - every bit of that is pure James, the shuffling beat, the romping piano, and Martin's phrasing is exactly like Tim Booth's. All it needs is some trumpet.

That's my issue with this band - I'm not convinced I'm listening to Coldplay, I'm still feel like I'm listening "Coldplay Takes On The Classics." But they do it really well, and this time they've actually made a really, really interesting album that I can actually play again and again and not get bored of. But is that Coldplay at work or Eno? I suspect it's Eno, unfortunately, but only time will tell - if they opt to not work with Eno in the future. U2 has proven they can turn out great stuff without Eno, James has proven they can turn out great stuff without Eno. Let's see Coldplay prove it. I'm actually rooting for them.

#5 — June 20, 2008 @ 21:31PM — El Bicho [URL]

According to whom, Glen? :P

#6 — June 20, 2008 @ 21:36PM — Glen Boyd [URL]

Well, according to me I suppose.

-Glen

#7 — July 2, 2008 @ 05:11AM — Ross

When did reviewers stop listening to the music? It makres you wonder when you read what people say about Coldplay's Viva La Vida. There are so many comments on titles, geeky Chris Martin and derivatives I found myself thinking I was reading a financial report. I thought this was about "popular music"? If so surely the important thing is whether you enjoyed the experience of listening to the music and whether it created an emotional response. Thats why I listen to music...what about the rest of the general public? Incidentally This is the best music and lyrics Coldplay have written!

#8 — July 2, 2008 @ 11:40AM — Dr Dreadful [URL]

I agree that this album is Coldplay's best work so far. There isn't a track I don't love, and there are very few records one can say that about.

The music is complex without being gratingly experimental. One needs to fire up a few brain cells in order to appreciate it, which is a good sign that it won't be getting stale any time soon. (Always a problem for me with songs I initially love and then get bored with after a few listens.)

As Glen noted, the band took a risk going outside their comfort zone, and it's paid off.

Looking forward to seeing them live in San Jose in a couple of weeks.

#9 — July 2, 2008 @ 21:39PM — Glen Boyd [URL]

Ross,

I did in fact listen to the Coldplay CD (many, many times in fact), although I'm not so sure you read my entire review.

If you did, you'd see that in fact I liked this CD quite a bit. While the U2/Eno comparisons should be obvious to anyone listening, I still am quite happy to otherwise see Martin and company branching out, and otherwise breaking out of the mold that made them stars.

But then, you'd know that if you read the review...

-Glen

#10 — July 4, 2008 @ 02:17AM — Ross

Glen,

I wasn't just commenting on your review and I did read it all. I had read many reviews before I got to yours. I think your review was fair and interesting but your 'faint praise' is nearly as bad no praise at all.

I think the album is so good I want to encourage people to listen to it, not put them off. Personally I don't think their latest effort sounds at all like U2...though I confess their earlier albums did and X & Y was ordinary. In the end it doesn't matter to me who they may sound like, as long I get pleasure from listening to it and its not an obvious take off.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/78191)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments