INTERVIEW

Interview: Steve Kleinedler, Supervising Editor of the American HeritageŽ Dictionary

Written by Clayton Perry
Published May 13, 2008
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

In the land of lexicons, what process must a word undergo before it can be granted space in a dictionary? You hear people joke about Beyoncé, and “bootylicious,” and words like that entering the dictionary, but what’s going on behind the scenes?

I will point out that we did not enter “bootylicious” in the American Heritage® Dictionary. However, there are a couple things going on and it depends on the type of word. There are some ideas or concepts that—well, take the elements in the periodic table, for example. All it takes is for the committee of the board that decides what the names of the elements are to say, “We’ve decided that element 111 is roentgenium,” and there you go. The people who are in charge of it said that this is what it is, and that’s all there is to say about it. It is what it is. Likewise, when they decided Pluto was not a planet anymore but a dwarf planet: You’ve got the body that decides this kind of thing saying, “Okay, we’ve created this category called dwarf planets.” It doesn’t matter how wide-ranging it is, it’s the fact that the people in charge of the IAU, the International Astronomical Union, said it was the case. Well, there you go.

Other words—by far, most words—are handled differently. Take slang, for instance. The American Heritage® Dictionary isn’t a slang dictionary. So, what happens when a slang term, for example, is considered to be entered into the dictionary? We would want to see how wide-ranging it is. Is it limited to New York or L.A. or Washington, or is it widespread? Is it used within only one sphere? Is it just used in the music world? Is it just used in the financial world or whatever? Or has it leaped across boundaries, is it being used more generally by people outside the area where the slang term first developed? So with slang, we want to see how widespread it is, whether it’s being used in a variety of sources.

There are many slang dictionaries and slang web sites are out there; they’re great and that’s what their focus is. I’m not putting down slang. I’m not a slang lexicographer; it’s not something that I am personally skilled at. For words that aren’t slang but describe, say, new innovations in computer technology—blog is a good example. You’ve seen how widespread it is, who is using it, and where. You want to look at a variety of sources and at some point, you just say, “Okay, it’s time for this word to go in,” because it’s either widespread enough or well-known enough or used enough.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Clayton Perry's mission parallels that of John Hope Franklin, Marcus Garvey and Carter G. Woodson. As the founder of the NUBIANO Project, Perry facilitates the design of projects that give voice to the Black diaspora, empower the Black community, redefine mainstream perspectives of "Blackness," and celebrate Black culture and history. He can be reached at crperry84@gmail.com.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Interview: Steve Kleinedler, Supervising Editor of the American HeritageŽ Dictionary
Published: May 13, 2008
Type: Interview
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Interviews, Books: Reference
Writer: Clayton Perry
Clayton Perry's BC Writer page
Clayton Perry's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Clayton Perry
Interviews
Books: Reference
All Culture Articles
All Interview articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/76819)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments